I'm having a disagreement with someone, having to do with JPEG's and how they are handled.
Photoshop, not that it should matter. Photos- originally taken as high quality jpg.
I maintain that the image, when opened in photoshop, is therefore (the whole thing, uncompressed now) in working memory. I make changes, edits, etc, and 'save as' to another jpg.
This guy is saying, you need to FIRST 'save as' as a photoshop (psd) document, then edit, then 'save as' again.
I don't see it though. What's that gain? You now have a 40 meg psd file. True you can then play around with it all you want- but the way I do it, I'm NEVER re-saving the original picture, so what's the difference?
I don't think I'm losing any picture quality. Am I?