Lots of computer geeks here, any science geeks around?

Page 3 of 3 [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Mercurial
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Oct 2010
Age: 53
Gender: Female
Posts: 537

29 Dec 2010, 3:12 pm

Physics, astronomy, fractal geometry, genetics/human anatomy, zoology, as well as some of the "soft" sciences. And I read and write sci fi. Yeah I'm a science geek. When my hyperlexia first presented between ages 3 and 4, some of the stuff I'd read were books on zoology and my dad's textbooks--he had a PhD in human anatomy and taught med students.



techn0teen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 663

29 Dec 2010, 6:03 pm

I love science. I am interested in biology, physics, neuroscience, and anything that involves graphs or visual data.



ShenLong
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,277
Location: With Murphy Freestylin' and Ricky Easy

29 Dec 2010, 8:17 pm

I'm a science geek, but I'm absolutely terrible with computers and math.



miseryandemptiness
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 16
Location: central NJ

05 Jan 2011, 4:10 pm

I am a physics graduate student. Also had a minor in math in undergraduate.



Sonariah
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jan 2011
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 10

05 Jan 2011, 7:46 pm

edit



PatrickNeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,136
Location: Scotland

06 Jan 2011, 12:06 am

Got to love science. Understanding of science has to be the solution so solving global problems.

This brings me to a point though, does anybody else think the political system is flawed? We have people in power, apparently listening to the public, listening to corporate influence and what other nations politicians are saying. Many of the ideas and solutions they turn into reality / law are based on what a corporation may want or what a government thinks will make people happy. They often ignore the scientific evidence whilst making these decisions.

Should the people in society, who are making the critical decisions on how to advance, not be the leading scientists who are knowledgeable enough o know what the most effective solutions are?


_________________
<Insert meaningful signature here> ;)