Page 8 of 13 [ 201 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 13  Next

b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

25 Mar 2013, 7:16 am

Ichinin wrote:
Television has no right to exist! The internet can deliver pretty much any show you wanna watch, without some moron TV planner deciding for you what to watch. The concept of force fed entertainment has to DIE.


i am not of the same opinion as you. i may be what you call "old" (compared to you), but my consideration about the matter is sound.

if you only follow your own lines of inquiry from a young age, you will be narrowly led into a mental matrix that has progressively diminishing returns.

i often have the "TV" on, and i have a 55" screen, so happenings on the screen often catch my eye. i look at my computer monitor much more than the TV screen, but i have been distracted by what is on TV on occasions (and i un-muted it) and it led me to a whole new avenue of interests that i would never have thought about if i had only ever followed my own lines of interest.

like i saw out of the corner of my eye a show called "the hudderites", and i was distracted by it more and more until i un-muted it and i actually watched the show and ignored the computer.

it taught me many things that i never knew, and if i was left to my own devices of curiosity, i would never have learned what i learned.

another show called "the people who built america" i found enthralling , and i had three days of fun researching "jp morgan" and "john rockerfella" etc, but i would never have dreamed of the reality of what i was inspired to research if it was not unsolicitedly beamed into my home by a TV planner.


i think that ones own curiosity is priceless, but i also think that a refusal to be curious about other peoples questions is the great leveler.


_________________________
i think buttons on shirts are very arduously senescent.
also laces on shoes i consider to be archaic.

velcro (as a factor in the structural component) should be a choice in every garment i wish to buy. i have old shoes with velcro fasteners like in the following clip.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tB_tCnRAf0Y[/youtube]
____________________

surface mail. i hate my letterbox!! i only collect letters from my letterbox at 2pm every friday afternoon. it is a habit.



Kookygirl
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 165
Location: Wales, UK.

25 Mar 2013, 7:22 am

eric76 wrote:
Arran wrote:
Cigarette lighters in car dashboards. How many people actually use them to light cigarettes with nowadays?


They have other uses.

I use mine along with a special adapter cable to charge my cell phone while driving.


My car has the socket to plug stuff in but has never had an actual cigarette lighter. I think a lot of the newer cars do this now.


_________________
If I agreed with you then we'd both be wrong!

When in doubt........mumble.


b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

25 Mar 2013, 7:38 am

if there is a coronal mass ejection that flows toward us, then digital storage of valuable knowledge would be desrtroyed



Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,450
Location: x

25 Mar 2013, 8:23 am

Cornflake wrote:
I think paper (and paper-like material) holds a relatively unique position because we're able to convey meaning simply by scratching marks on it, and that extreme level of simple functionality is unlikely to be completely replaced.
But when several million pages of information can be moved or duplicated with 100% accuracy in seconds, why would paper even be considered practical in those situations?


There are situations where electronic records are more practical than paper records. But there are also situations where paper trumps electronics. Paper requires no power source and no technological compatibility beyond being able to read the language.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

25 Mar 2013, 9:44 am

[quote="Janissy"]

The paper also has to last a long time. Now paper is made so that it does not oxidize and turn brown and brittle. Also the inks do not fade quickly when exposed to air.

ruveyn



EliteEnigma57
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2012
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 64
Location: CT

25 Mar 2013, 5:46 pm

b9 wrote:
Ichinin wrote:
Television has no right to exist! The internet can deliver pretty much any show you wanna watch, without some moron TV planner deciding for you what to watch. The concept of force fed entertainment has to DIE.


i am not of the same opinion as you. i may be what you call "old" (compared to you), but my consideration about the matter is sound.

if you only follow your own lines of inquiry from a young age, you will be narrowly led into a mental matrix that has progressively diminishing returns.

i often have the "TV" on, and i have a 55" screen, so happenings on the screen often catch my eye. i look at my computer monitor much more than the TV screen, but i have been distracted by what is on TV on occasions (and i un-muted it) and it led me to a whole new avenue of interests that i would never have thought about if i had only ever followed my own lines of interest.

like i saw out of the corner of my eye a show called "the hudderites", and i was distracted by it more and more until i un-muted it and i actually watched the show and ignored the computer.

it taught me many things that i never knew, and if i was left to my own devices of curiosity, i would never have learned what i learned.

another show called "the people who built america" i found enthralling , and i had three days of fun researching "jp morgan" and "john rockerfella" etc, but i would never have dreamed of the reality of what i was inspired to research if it was not unsolicitedly beamed into my home by a TV planner.


i think that ones own curiosity is priceless, but i also think that a refusal to be curious about other peoples questions is the great leveler.


I guess I'll add to this: I don't think giving up TV is feasible right now. While the internet has revolutionized the entertainment industry and will hopefully get rid of the notion of traditional TV scheduling, it's not quite there yet. Also, most video game consoles rely exclusively on television to display game graphics, and I don't think that's going to change anytime soon. And as b9 said, TV provides some experiences that the internet just can't replicate.



CornerPuzzlePieces
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 308
Location: B.C Canada

26 Mar 2013, 4:32 am

I find most of my new shows online/ but sometimes through tv..


One point I will say is that I hate watching "to be continued" episodes on tv. +1 for internet there.

If it's been out for more than a month, I will not be waiting a week to see it on some backwater channel.. I will be watching it after it finishes buffering in 5-10 minutes. :)



ProfessorX
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Feb 2007
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,795

30 Mar 2013, 10:17 am

I know this is going to sound absurd but, the idea of limited location based wi-fi in that, I once hard heard of of WiMax-Providing a wireless alternative to cable and digital subscriber line . But, this never really took of as neither did Power line internet access yes, both of them exist but, they are only in small quantity in terms of the marketplace.

Lastly, I wish there was a time when electricity distribution was not done via power lines as, Nikola Tesla had tried to develop such technology.



OddDuckNash99
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,562

02 Apr 2013, 7:53 am

There's nothing I find more useless than stupid FAX MACHINES! :x


_________________
Helinger: Now, what do you see, John?
Nash: Recognition...
Helinger: Well, try seeing accomplishment!
Nash: Is there a difference?


Tiranasta
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 278

02 Apr 2013, 3:47 pm

fueledbycoffee wrote:
DOSbox. Games were not better in the 80's. I know, I get nostalgic, too... but let's get real running to the right side of the screen and jumping over pits has nothing on S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

Ultimately, that's just an opinion. I can only speak for myself when I say that I still enjoy a number of DOS games, which I sometimes find to be just as enjoyable as modern games. And before you call that nostalgia, note that DOS was before my time; I was never a DOS gamer. My earliest gaming experiences are with 3D games on the first PlayStation.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

02 Apr 2013, 4:42 pm

OddDuckNash99 wrote:
There's nothing I find more useless than stupid FAX MACHINES! :x


FAXs have their uses. Not everyone has a computer.

ruveyn



BeautifulTechno
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 9 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 87
Location: If I don't know it, how could you know?

12 Apr 2013, 11:53 am

For me, touchscreen cell phones. Albeit more practical for cellaholics(not me, not even interested in buying a cellphone any time soon) battery lives are just dreadful and terrible. Can't they optimize it? Probably they can - they want cheap technology, that's what I think. Until it isn't optimized, let's hope that something innovating and refreshing comes out from technological companies.



CornerPuzzlePieces
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 308
Location: B.C Canada

12 Apr 2013, 1:11 pm

BeautifulTechno wrote:
For me, touchscreen cell phones. Albeit more practical for cellaholics(not me, not even interested in buying a cellphone any time soon) battery lives are just dreadful and terrible. Can't they optimize it? Probably they can - they want cheap technology, that's what I think. Until it isn't optimized, let's hope that something innovating and refreshing comes out from technological companies.


That would be the backlight on the lcd screen.. something new that looks promising is O-LED's.

It's not the touchscreen that drains it, just turn the brightness down if you want amazing battery life! :)



richie
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jan 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 30,142
Location: Lake Whoop-Dee-Doo, Pennsylvania

13 Apr 2013, 6:23 am

Here is one technology that refuses to die: Fossil fuels.


_________________
Life! Liberty!...and Perseveration!!.....
Weiner's Law of Libraries: There are no answers, only cross references.....
My Blog: http://richiesroom.wordpress.com/


BeautifulTechno
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 9 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 87
Location: If I don't know it, how could you know?

13 Apr 2013, 8:21 am

CornerPuzzlePieces wrote:
BeautifulTechno wrote:
For me, touchscreen cell phones. Albeit more practical for cellaholics(not me, not even interested in buying a cellphone any time soon) battery lives are just dreadful and terrible. Can't they optimize it? Probably they can - they want cheap technology, that's what I think. Until it isn't optimized, let's hope that something innovating and refreshing comes out from technological companies.


That would be the backlight on the lcd screen.. something new that looks promising is O-LED's.

It's not the touchscreen that drains it, just turn the brightness down if you want amazing battery life! :)


Indeed. Promising, yet not applied to cellphones.
Well, I won't do that because I don't have a cellphone. :lol:
Well, if you actually turn the brightness down battery life gets better - still, is it going to be compared to phones that are not touchscreen? Well, I guess not. :wink:



Drehmaschine
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Feb 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 781
Location: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

13 Apr 2013, 6:59 pm

Dial up internet. I like my Technics too much to put it on this list.