Here, just to stop the brewing argument before you guys get going
:
From
Webster's:
Coriolis forceOne entry found.
Main Entry: Coriolis force
Function: noun
Etymology: Gaspard G. Coriolis †1843 French civil engineer
Date: 1923
: an apparent force that as a result of the earth's rotation deflects moving objects (as projectiles or air currents) to the right in the northern hemisphere and to the left in the southern hemisphere
So ... both of you gents are a bit off. Coriolis force is indeed a
rotation based definition (#5 is wrong about this being shear), but it is relating to the
Earth's rotation (Ruveyn is wrong about it applying to any rotating frame of reference).
I never said the Coriolis effect was responsible for wind shear, but rather that wind shear is responsible for tornadoes.