EtotheC wrote:
Fuzzy wrote:
EtotheC wrote:
Fuzzy wrote:
the greatest compatibility
exactly
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d3bc/7d3bcf9efde15934cee91f543d24d3d5a59b69f2" alt="Very Happy :D"
Its funny that they are not more open. The ipod was a huge foot in the door for Apple.
Open?
That's a word that is neither in Ballmer's nor Gate's dictionary/thesaurus/other language referencing tool.At least Apple have some form of community.But then again that could just be biased...
You can use safari on windows, and at one point, OSX had a version of internet explorer. These were offered free to the competition as incentive to try other products from the company(MS/Apple). Another good example is Quicktime/itunes.
Things like these act as bridges, easing a person to switch operating systems. The ipod is a good example too, as people love them. At that point they start musing getting a computer from the same company.
Linux benefits immensely from firefox, open office and gimp for the same reasons. Other rising stars are pidgin chat client and songbird. combined with one of the open source email clients, Almost all computer activity is covered for the common user. At that point, finding out that these are all packaged together makes changing a lot easier.
Actually, thats what we should be doing.. pushing these as viable instead of just linux as a whole.
_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.