Page 2 of 4 [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

SammichEater
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2011
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,903

23 Apr 2011, 4:49 pm

As far as I know I don't think it would be possible. However, it would be fun to try and see if we can send an unmanned vehicle over there.


_________________
Remember, all atrocities begin in a sensible place.


huntedman
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 467

23 Apr 2011, 10:34 pm

robin45 wrote:
The problems with the electronics overheating can be solved in part, perhaps in the next 10yrs using instead of silcon based component , components made from diamond instead. There is a company in the USA trying to grow diamond wafers using the vapour disposition method, I think its called then to make an n type and p type diamond material, the silicon equivalent.


They have higher temperature silicon electronics being developed for space applications, although nothing that could compare with diamond, they just look at least 20 years out. It takes a huge amount of time to go through the technical readiness level (TRL) certification process for NASA. If diamond based electronics are ready for normal use in 10 years, it might be 40 before they make it into space. There are still satellites in launched today with old 486 processors from the 80s.

It's not just them being cautious either, there are allot of problems with space electronics. The biggest is that the trace width in modern electronics is too close to a wavelength of radiation emitted by solar flares. This causes the program cache on new generation 65 or 45nm processors to flip bits randomly as it adsorbs the background radiation.


Random Venus design documents:

They have a proposal for a Venus rover and solar plane, but most of the technologies they need for it won't be ready for many years (if ever):
Landis rover concept

So far the real concepts that they are actually considering building are a stationary probe and an atmospheric balloon:
SAGE: misson site
VME: Power point
VME: journal article

[/ObscureRant]



AstroGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,582

24 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm

ruveyn wrote:
AstroGeek wrote:
Certainly sending a manned mission to Venus orbit would certainly be possible, and probably easier than sending a manned mission to Mars. But why bother? Probes can do that. Exploring the atmosphere would be possible too, (although again, I don't know why bother) and probably would require some experience with space before we'd be ready. Landing someone on the surface sounds pretty near out of the question for now. Certainly it seems unlikely that anyone would be able to leave the spacecraft in a suit. I'm pretty sure to withstand that pressure and temperature the suit would have to be way to heavy. Not to say those problems can never be overcome, but I don't see it happening anytime soon.

Getting off of Venus would be a royal pain. There is a thick atmosphere, meaning lots of drag to overcome. Of course, that means you'd get lots of lift too. But the high pressures would really make it hard for the rockets to function--I don't know enough about the physics to say how easily or not that could be overcome. Also, I don't think there is anything in the atmosphere you could use for fuel, meaning you'd have to carry all of your fuel with you on your rocket. We can do that of course (it's how our current ones work) but it is extremely costly. And just imagine trying to carry a Falcon9 or AtlasV to Venus.


1. We don't have the technology for landing a man on Venus and bringing him back to Earth.
2. We are not likely to have that technology for a long time.
3. There is no point to doing it, anyway.

The only way we have now to send any vehicle to Venus and bring it back to Earth is to do a slingshot trick around the planet and use the conservation of angular momentum. Our rockets are not powerful, they are not fast. The fastest speed attained by one of our vehicles w.o. the slingshot is 66,000 mph. For a large vehicle we can barely manage escape velocity from earth.

ruveyn

ruveyn

That's what I was saying. But getting a ship to Venus orbit and back isn't any harder then getting something to Mars orbit and back is it (other than higher heatloads)? Also, take a look at VASIMR--Ad AstraCoropration. It could probably do it. And it's legit--they'll be testing a prototype on the ISS in a couple of years.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

24 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm

robin45 wrote:
For any of you astrophysicists out there I was wondering if it would be possible with todays technology to land a man on Venus for say 30 minutes, do some experiments and get rock samples then to leave the surface and return to an orbiting spacecraft.

No.

The landing craft would have to be capable of achieving Cytherian escape velocity with practically no prep time. Also, this landing craft would have to be armored, refrigerated, and shielded from the corrosive effects of sulfuric acid in the atmosphere of Venus. Beginning with a landing craft the size of a Saturn-V launch system, double the mass for shielding and refrigeration, and then double the mass again for fuel (for both landing and take-off).

We can't even run the shuttle program without incurring fatalities in a normal Earth environment.



robin45
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2011
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 87

24 Apr 2011, 2:39 pm

I don't think the sulphuric acid in the Venusian atmosphere would be much of a problem because its high up in the atmosphere and is quite tenuous. Vasmir once developed and powered by some sort of nuclear reactor would get the astronauts to Venus quite quickly. One way to take of from the surface is to take advantage of the thick atmosphere with a rocket plane. On take of it would hover, to do away with a runway then it would fly like a normal aircraft to an altitude where theres less drag then fire the rocket engines in order to get to the mothership. The problem would be the weight of the fuel source. An interesting problem non the less but not one I take to seriously.



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

24 Apr 2011, 3:52 pm

robin45 wrote:
I don't think the sulphuric acid in the Venusian atmosphere would be much of a problem because its high up in the atmosphere and is quite tenuous. Vasmir once developed and powered by some sort of nuclear reactor would get the astronauts to Venus quite quickly. One way to take of from the surface is to take advantage of the thick atmosphere with a rocket plane. On take of it would hover, to do away with a runway then it would fly like a normal aircraft to an altitude where theres less drag then fire the rocket engines in order to get to the mothership. The problem would be the weight of the fuel source. An interesting problem non the less but not one I take to seriously.


not to talk about the bouyancy effect of the atmosphere, a pressurized cylinder with a balloon (metal/ceramic bellows for example) could take a vehicle to the upper atmoshpere.
still dont think its viable for human surface exploration, as many others have stated in far more detail before.

one thing i would like to know is how corrosion resistant carbon nanofiber is, it would make the construction of the vehicle a lot easier and lighter.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


AstroGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,582

24 Apr 2011, 7:28 pm

Oodain wrote:
robin45 wrote:
I don't think the sulphuric acid in the Venusian atmosphere would be much of a problem because its high up in the atmosphere and is quite tenuous. Vasmir once developed and powered by some sort of nuclear reactor would get the astronauts to Venus quite quickly. One way to take of from the surface is to take advantage of the thick atmosphere with a rocket plane. On take of it would hover, to do away with a runway then it would fly like a normal aircraft to an altitude where theres less drag then fire the rocket engines in order to get to the mothership. The problem would be the weight of the fuel source. An interesting problem non the less but not one I take to seriously.


not to talk about the bouyancy effect of the atmosphere, a pressurized cylinder with a balloon (metal/ceramic bellows for example) could take a vehicle to the upper atmoshpere.
still dont think its viable for human surface exploration, as many others have stated in far more detail before.

one thing i would like to know is how corrosion resistant carbon nanofiber is, it would make the construction of the vehicle a lot easier and lighter.

This is kind of like what science fiction author Ben Bova proposes in his book Venus. Taking a standard cargo ship (this is in the 2090's, so cargo flights to the asteroid belt are quite routine already) towing a special spacecraft to Venus orbit, a crew then enters a special airship with ceramic/metal (cermet) shielding to the mid atmosphere. A rocket plane was then used to land on the surface for a few minutes and used robotic manipulator arms to retrieve samples. The rocket plane takes off and gets to the mid atmosphere where it rendezvous with the airship. This heads to the upper atmosphere, from where it uses rockets to achieve orbit. The astronauts transfer back to the cargo ship and head to Earth. This would be quite challenging, certainly, but it sounds vaguely plausible--like something we might be able to do withing a century.



robin45
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2011
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 87

25 Apr 2011, 8:37 am

What if an alien artifact was located on Venus and a spacecraft was sent to retrieve it. There would be a very strong interest by Nasa, ESA ETC to find out what it is. This is not as far fetched as it seems. If an alien coke can drifts for millions of years and ends up on the moon it would stand out easily and would'nt have deteriorated much in no atmosphere.



John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

25 Apr 2011, 8:21 pm

I'm not against exploring Venus, I'm just curious who is paying for the development of the technology and where the money for the mission is going to come from.

It's not exactly like a mission to Venus is a once in 80+ year window of opportunity. We can put it off until the technology is cheaper.


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


Tollorin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,178
Location: Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

25 Apr 2011, 10:29 pm

ryan93 wrote:
I don't see how they would get around the problem of the, y'know, Sulphuric Acid clouds. Most polymers (all, I would suspect) are made from carbon bonds that a strong acid would chew through in a second.

So, fullerene radiators would be out of the question I guess... (Not that we can built that today.) Would copper be able to handle the heat!?


_________________
Down with speculators!! !


Last edited by Tollorin on 25 Apr 2011, 11:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

25 Apr 2011, 10:38 pm

John_Browning wrote:
I'm not against exploring Venus, I'm just curious who is paying for the development of the technology and where the money for the mission is going to come from.

It's not exactly like a mission to Venus is a once in 80+ year window of opportunity. We can put it off until the technology is cheaper.


Its true, it is just too difficult to land there at the current time. Exploring easier targets first should be a priority, and lead to further technological development. There isn't much that Venus has that isn't available elsewhere, easier. In the mean time we have an orbiter there now, and in the future I expect there will be more. Within 50 years I suspect every planet, dwarf planet and really interesting moon in the solar system will have dedicated observatory satellites in orbit. Perhaps sooner, now that the private industry is taking off- individual universities could conceivably fund their own low-budget probes to investigate moons, for example

Someone mentioned that the sulfuric acid wouldn't be an issue at the surface- not true; it rains sulfuric acid... :(


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

29 Apr 2011, 9:47 am

Can't the Venusians come here? Lazy sods.


_________________
Not currently a moderator


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

29 Apr 2011, 1:20 pm

Moog wrote:
Can't the Venusians come here? Lazy sods.


The aren't any Venusians.

ruveyn



Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

29 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm

Move it first. In a counter Earth orbit it would cool off.

It will take thousands of years, but the results will be worth it.

Leaching metals with acid is standard recovery, and here is a planet size mine.

How something smaller than Earth holds on to such an atmosphere brings up questions. There have been views that it is not original to this solar system, something that came recently.

As something degassing, forming a Sulphuric Acid reflux, the surface should be coated in metal sulphides.

Sulphuric Acid is stored in glass, and with the atmospheric pressure, a large Japanese fishing float could be made to survive, and weigh nothing at the surface. Getting the ore back into orbit takes more than we have, costs more than it is worth, today, but once the prospect was assayed, people will think about how. Gold, Copper, Silver, are not surface minerals. On Venus they are.

I would go after the Asteriod Belt first. Some of our meteors are pure Nickel/iron, something found near the core of a planet, and deeper, gold, Silver, and the greater mass minerals. If it was a planet that got smashed, there are chunks of pure core out there.

Some larger asteriods pass Earth orbit, then go out to the belt, Self powered, a kilometer long, something that can be hollowed out for shielding, habitat, and with spin, artifical gravity.

The energy needs would be minor to pick up sections of core, tether them, and later drop them in Earth orbit.

If we are ever going to build a real space ship, it will be built in orbit, with materials gathered off planet. Shipping, and other reasons, keep us from building a proper kilometer bubble with a skin of gold several meters thick.

Without shielding, we will not last long enough to get anywhere. The skin has to be thick enough to form craters from impacts. Gold works, and can be patched. High mass works best for the slingshot out of here.

Rocket fuel is not going to work for the next solar system, a mechanical start and stop is the only way. Only gold would be looking new when the ship arrives 10,000 years later.

We have been gaining some insight into other stars, their planets, but expecting more than water is wishful thinking. Venus is earth size, but would not make it as a colony.

Finding life would most likely kill you, for us to survive, kill everything and reseed. Just the first landing could take a thousand years.

Most will fail, but the odds of species survival on earth for 10,000 years are very low.

Then there is who gets sent. A Cracked article says only a few percent of our DNA makes us, the rest is filler from retroviruses, Neanderthal and another sub species I have never heard of, and like my computer programs, something I use a few percent over time.

Being apes, Mammals, more was picked up before we were us. It is dormant now, but in a small gene pool for 500 generations, evolution will be tested.

We have nothing to lose, lets infect the Universe.

All colonies will become sub species. On earth we have genetic leakage, in space what you start with is reduced in every generation.



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

29 Apr 2011, 3:26 pm

Moog wrote:
Can't the Venusians come here? Lazy sods.


Venus is full of cranky women. We have more than enough here! :wink:


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

29 Apr 2011, 4:10 pm

Inventor wrote:

Then there is who gets sent. A Cracked article says only a few percent of our DNA makes us, the rest is filler from retroviruses, Neanderthal and another sub species I have never heard of, and like my computer programs, something I use a few percent over time.



great post first of all,
i actually think that junk dna was found to contain some uses, that they have simply eluded us, i believe genomics will propel humanity beyond imagination as we get the computing power to solve these problems.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.