Physics anyone?

Page 2 of 2 [ 25 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2

Previous topic | Next topic

slave
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Age: 111
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: Dystopia Planetia

29 May 2012, 6:29 pm

ScottTheSculptor wrote:

Feynman Lectures, have 'em, luv 'em.

But. . . I wouldn't consider it "basic".
It is very math oriented.

If you have a story about how things connect before you "learn" physics you will be better off.

Survey technologies - metalworking, woodworking, ceramics, semiconductors, and engineering drawing (abstraction skills) . . . *then* read Feynman and you will have references in the real world to connect to.

Asimov's "Guide to Science" was really helpful for me, but it's pretty old :-)

I quit physics when it got theoretical.
It has an error so it *can't* make sense- 80% of the universe is missing.
(I eventually fixed it but no physicist will accept a solution from "outside")

could you share details of how you "fixed" Physics?

ScottTheSculptor
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 27 Dec 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 47

30 May 2012, 6:23 am

slave wrote:

could you share details of how you "fixed" Physics?

Removed the 4th dimension. Changed "speed of light" to "rate of time".
Merged aether and string using relativity.
Turned relativity into the relative motion between 3D matter and 1D quanta string flow.
Created a sort of sub-dimensional physics - 1D quanta strings, 2D light, 3D matter.
(see sig)

Light is 2D - on edge it's a wave, face on it's a particle.

http://www.psychforums.com/blog/ScottTh ... -1970.html

_________________
There are no absolute truths, only well established ones.
"Truth" is the best logic that fits the available evidence.
Logic is derived from the structure and iterative nature of the universe.
Gather evidence, apply logic, argue until agreement and that defines the "truth", for now.
If you don't agree, gather more evidence, strengthen your logical arguments.
This is the first tenet of the House of Logic.

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

30 May 2012, 2:00 pm

ScottTheSculptor wrote:

slave wrote:

could you share details of how you "fixed" Physics?

Reference in a refereed science journal please and SHOW THE MATH..

ruveyn

ScottTheSculptor
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 27 Dec 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 47

30 May 2012, 4:00 pm

Only previously theories count?

That would be like creating eleven dimensions to "fix" Einstein's four dimensions.

Standing on the shoulder of giants just propogates the errors.

Believing an "expert'" on is not "our" way.
Science journal? 80% of the universe is missing.

slave
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Age: 111
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: Dystopia Planetia

30 May 2012, 7:21 pm

ScottTheSculptor wrote:

Your ideas can only be understood properly and evaluated IF you show us the equations. That is the way Physics and Cosmology MUST work. I look forward to seeing the Math(s).

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

31 May 2012, 1:44 am

ScottTheSculptor wrote:

Only previously theories count?

That would be like creating eleven dimensions to "fix" Einstein's four dimensions.

Standing on the shoulder of giants just propogates the errors.

Progress is mostly incremental. Without Galileo and Kepler, Newton would have been a Cambridge educated farmer. And Newton himself admitted this.

ruveyn

ScottTheSculptor
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 27 Dec 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 47

31 May 2012, 10:25 am

But you are supposed to actually understand the previous simplified abstractions.

Does a modern physicist understand relativity & quantum theory?

You have to know what Einstein knew and know *how* he figured it out.
Wasn't anywhere near as much "available data" back then.
His interests were wide enough - patent office work lets you observe many technologies.

One of the reasons that I *could* fix it was finding a 1905 aether theory book.
The other 6500 non-fiction books helped. (counting scientific periodicals as books)

For an example of my mind;
I passed Physical Chemistry as an art major.
(but only with a B)

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

31 May 2012, 3:09 pm

ScottTheSculptor wrote:

But you are supposed to actually understand the previous simplified abstractions.

Does a modern physicist understand relativity & quantum theory?

Better than you.

ruveyn

ScottTheSculptor
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 27 Dec 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 47

02 Jun 2012, 11:17 am

You claim to be a physicist?

Or psychic?

Page 2 of 2 [ 25 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2

Jump to:

Physics anyone? Post Reply New Topic

Physics anyone?