eric76 wrote:
So your answer is to deny TV to people who live in remote areas? Make everyone move to a big city with cheap Internet?
There are many places without much in the way of Internet at all or with limitations on bandwidth.
Around here, most people have two choices for Internet -- satellite Internet that with severe limitations on your bandwidth and poor service or fixed wireless Internet with much better performance and fewer limitations. However, with the high cost of the multiple T-1 lines (ours has three T-1 lines) to service the customers it would be impossible for many to watch TV at the same time. Even with just three T-1 lines, the company just barely breaks even in spite of paying considerably less than competitive wages.
Well, that is your reality - not mine, where i live we have a well developed infrastructure, You cannot get less than 100 MBit in an apartment and mobile 80 MBit (4G) network is available all over the country. So in MY world - its like the other guy said, TV is for old people.
But the emphasis is this: The older generation like to be shown stuff and not to make choices of what to see. I like to decide for myself what to watch. This is why i buy series on DVD so i can watch whatever i like, when i like it and not to be a slave to the box.
_________________
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring" (Carl Sagan)