Adamantium wrote:
Rudin wrote:
6=5+5/5+(5-5)
For this one, I prefer 6=5!/(5+5+5+5)
So, while I agree with you that the latter is more aesthetically pleasing, it is objectively inefficient. I think it is because there is more action, where 5!/20=6 provides more revelation than 6+1+0, so the inefficiency is itself entertaining, yet in solving for efficiency, the entire problem set seems again exciting.
The original 4 fours was a contest held by Ruth Carver and the preferred answer was the one that used the least operations. A more human measure of efficiency as these operations are essentially equivalent to the human mind. The original contest also ran from 0-100.
_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 142 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 52 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)
"If I knew that it was fated for me to be sick, I would even wish for it; for the foot also, if it had intelligence, would volunteer to get muddy." - Chrysippus