malithion2 wrote:
Well, that ignores that the inflationary phase of expansion may have exceeded the speed of light (space can expand at whatever speed it wants too), and on top of that, oddly, wikipedia claims that the universe is actually much larger than that. One of their sources is Constraining the Topology of the Universe, which says:
Quote:
For a wide class of models, the nondetection rules out the possibility that we live in a universe with topology scale smaller than 24 Gpc.
where Gpc is billions of parsecs.
This has something to do with the fact the univere's expansion or something. For example, I would suspect that although we may be seeing light emitted 14 billion years ago, what emitted that light has since had plenty of time to get much farther away than that. Although I'm not sure if that is the correct explanation
I think space is still limited by the speed of light, if space expanded at or in excess of light speed there would be no lights, the radiation would red shift to non existence. I wouldn't trust wiki but either way that still states a finite size of the universe +- of 24Gpc's. Plus the big bang was a one time event, it only exists in the past.
Well, yes the universe may well be finite, but my point is that this is not obvious. And it isn't a matter of trusting wiki; aside from the fact that their sources are traceable, I also rarely cite them for something unless I've heard it elsewhere. Anyway, my first point makes plenty of sense; since what we see 14 billion lightyears away is the past, the size of the universe must exceed that of the visible by the amount the visible universe would have expanded in the time it has taken the light to get here.
Now, as for whether or not the expansion of the universe has exceeded the speed of light in the past, this is something I have heard quite frequently, although I suppose I'll have to go dig up a source to prove it to you sometime...
_________________
* here for the nachos.