Page 6 of 13 [ 204 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 13  Next

Paddy789
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 222

24 Aug 2008, 8:53 pm

You're using a Geforce 6200 as a GPU, of course it's going to run crap for you. :lol:



gamefreak
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,119
Location: Citrus County, Florida

24 Aug 2008, 8:55 pm

chever wrote:
gamefreak wrote:
chever wrote:
Toss up between Vista and NT



Windows NT was the revolutionary OS 2000, XP, and Vista were built off of. Yeah it didn't have support for consumer hardware but that was because it was a business OS.


I didn't like it because it was unstable

NT: Neolithic Technology



It was a hell of a lot more stable than Windows 3.1 and 9X.



chever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: Earth

24 Aug 2008, 10:35 pm

gamefreak wrote:
It was a hell of a lot more stable than Windows 3.1 and 9X.


Comparing something that sucks to something that sucks even more doesn't mean the thing that sucks less doesn't suck.


_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"


twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

25 Aug 2008, 12:06 am

I've decided to scapegoat Vista for my recent computer complete and total clusterf**k (which culminated in a reformatting).

Burn mutha!


_________________
* here for the nachos.


gamefreak
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,119
Location: Citrus County, Florida

25 Aug 2008, 4:52 am

chever wrote:
gamefreak wrote:
It was a hell of a lot more stable than Windows 3.1 and 9X.


Comparing something that sucks to something that sucks even more doesn't mean the thing that sucks less doesn't suck.



I just happened to like NT because I used it for several years and got accustomed to it. Windows NT wasn't bloated with cute crap or anything. It was just a Rock Solid OS that was good for Office Work, Security and Web Browsing. Sort of how linux is king right now for that same purpose.



Drakilor
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Age: 178
Gender: Female
Posts: 186

25 Aug 2008, 6:59 am

Lunix. I hate it. It's never going to go off anyway since you need Windoze to run it, so you might as well use the best OS in existence (why else would it be so popular).


_________________
"Love looks not with the eyes, but with the mind; And therefore is winged Cupid painted blind."


Diamonddavej
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 530
Location: Ireland

25 Aug 2008, 11:21 am

It had DOS 3.2 with Windows 1.0 on a 286 (it was donated to an astronomy club I worked in). The computer was a heap of bolts, it had an external hard drive, not that it was supposed to be an external HD, there was simply no room left inside the computer, so the HD was balanced precariously next to the case, and held by some blue tack.

One day an error came up in Windows - "Hard Drive read/write failure". I thought the HD broke. No, it was simply full up, there was no warning that the 5 megabyte HD was filling up, it just crashed the OS. I had to delete files using DOS.

P.S. Windows 1.0 was a worse version of Mac classic OS, which it was a clone.



Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,223
Location: Alberta Canada

25 Aug 2008, 12:29 pm

Drakilor wrote:
Lunix. I hate it. It's never going to go off anyway since you need Windoze to run it.


Explain this totally nonsensical statement.What does windows have to do with running linux?


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.


chever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: Earth

25 Aug 2008, 2:30 pm

gamefreak wrote:
chever wrote:
gamefreak wrote:
It was a hell of a lot more stable than Windows 3.1 and 9X.


Comparing something that sucks to something that sucks even more doesn't mean the thing that sucks less doesn't suck.



I just happened to like NT because I used it for several years and got accustomed to it. Windows NT wasn't bloated with cute crap or anything. It was just a Rock Solid OS that was good for Office Work, Security and Web Browsing. Sort of how linux is king right now for that same purpose.


I did not find it incredibly stable.


_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"


Paddy789
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 222

25 Aug 2008, 2:46 pm

Odd, it's pretty stable for me.



t0
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2008
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 726
Location: The 4 Corners of the 4th Dimension

25 Aug 2008, 3:39 pm

chever wrote:
I did not find it incredibly stable.


What version? What apps? We ran 4 NT3.51 servers in production for over a year without maintanence (reboots included). They were running as authentication servers and processed an average of 400 requests/sec each during that timeframe.



frohman2
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2008
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 35

03 Sep 2008, 2:25 am

windows vista is probably the worst, especially when transferring files but I have put peazip on it to fix that
Windows XP is the best, along with NT and 2000



jdbob
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2006
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 263
Location: Oregon

03 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm

Versados by a big margin. In case you are wondering, it was Motorola's operating system for the 68000 family in the later half of the 1980s.



Bullzeye
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 8 Sep 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 32

09 Sep 2008, 4:15 pm

ReactOS. I know it's in alpha stage, but it's horrible right now. Luckily, I was running it from a LiveCD. Didn't want to recognize my mouse and video card. Right and I mean RIGHT after it booted it crashed. It's got me wondering how much trouble it would cause if it was actually installed on an HDD.



finrod
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2008
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 72

22 Sep 2008, 12:24 am

vista. I'm not sure it would be possible to design a crappier OS. I had my computer taken back and downgraded to XP (or should I say majorly upgraded) because of all the annoyances, like it automatically closing all my windows without warning anytime a new update was available, but when I tried to close something, it would pop up a window asking me what I wanted to do instead of letting of just closing the window/program I had just told it to close. I also was forbidden from seeing any of the settings that I had permission to change! and I wasn't permitted to download anything directly from microsofts website because it had marked it as a site with a security problem. And its so unstable you have to wonder how it got on the market in the first place.

There are 2 kinds of computer owners in this world - those who can use a computer and those who have vista :lol:



Gambit
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 39

24 Sep 2008, 3:44 pm

mandrake 10