Google is failing consumers by profiting from scam websites

Page 1 of 1 [ 12 posts ] 

TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

13 Jan 2010, 4:40 am

Interesting article. The number of scam websites is much higher than I thought and Google is virtually turning a blind eye so long as the advertising revenue comes in - up to £5 per click. Google performs no checks on the sites it promotes and leaves it to victimised customers to report scam sites to them. The article recommends not buying anything from websites with sponsored links, or you risk your credit/debit card being compromised and money stolen or shoddy counterfeit / dangerous goods arriving or no goods at all.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/consumer_affairs/article6980806.ece


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


rabryst
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 19 May 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 113
Location: Canada

13 Jan 2010, 5:21 am

Quote:
The article recommends not buying anything from websites with sponsored links

Wow, talk about an overreaction. What about genuine people trying to make money using sponsored links? The moral of the story: watch what you do online, and if something seems too good to be true, it is.

Thanks for the link, TallyMan. This is by no means a personal attack on you. It raises awareness of a problem, which is very useful.


_________________
If you break a crumb in half, you have two crumbs - George Carlin


TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

13 Jan 2010, 6:16 am

The thing that surprised me was Google's lack of checking into the companies they show adverts for, instead leaving it up to victims to report scam sites to them. I think people (myself included) perhaps naively gave more credibility to the adverts than they deserved, wrongly assuming that Google had done at least some basic checks on who they were promoting and doing business with. I've never fallen foul of such a scam site myself because I tend to be very mistrusting of buying anything online anyway.

I tend to give more credibility to free (none-advertised) sites at the top of a search than sponsored links anyway.

As always buyer beware. However, as the article says there are a number of cloned websites that look indistinguishable from the real one - how does the average person tell the difference if the prices are not cut to an unbelievable level? The first people will know that they've been scammed is when their goods don't show up or their account has been drained.


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


rabryst
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 19 May 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 113
Location: Canada

13 Jan 2010, 6:19 am

Some good points, TallyMan.


_________________
If you break a crumb in half, you have two crumbs - George Carlin


pakled
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,015

13 Jan 2010, 12:01 pm

must be why they're not going to censor in China any more...distract people.

that being said, there's billions of sites out there, and no one can check them all on a continuing basis (not even the Chinese government, though wouldn't they want to try...;)

As long as they clean out offenders as reported, that's about all they can do.


_________________
anahl nathrak, uth vas bethude, doth yel dyenvey...


ValMikeSmith
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 May 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 977
Location: Stranger in a strange land

14 Jan 2010, 6:58 am

<oops extra post>



Last edited by ValMikeSmith on 14 Jan 2010, 7:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

ValMikeSmith
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 May 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 977
Location: Stranger in a strange land

14 Jan 2010, 7:07 am

I ***HATE*** the word CONSUMER. :evil:

Hello I am Mr. Consumer.
That's B.S. Consumer.
I CONSUME BOVINE EXCREMENT! 8O

Hey Mr. Consumer what kind of sheet can I feed you tonite?
HOW ABOUT SOME LONG PIG! GULP! YUMMY! :twisted evil:

The proper etiquette term I believe is CUSTOMER. :D

CONSUMERS ARE WHAT THEY EAT, TRASH, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT'S FOR SALE!
AND THEN YOU HAVE TO FLUSH IT.

Isn't that nasty, that they use words like that and rip you off?
I only told the story to explain what the words really mean.
They call you a consumer because you keep buying their rubbish and waste it.



Avarice
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,067

19 Jan 2010, 12:42 am

TallyMan wrote:
The thing that surprised me was Google's lack of checking into the companies they show adverts for, instead leaving it up to victims to report scam sites to them. I think people (myself included) perhaps naively gave more credibility to the adverts than they deserved, wrongly assuming that Google had done at least some basic checks on who they were promoting and doing business with. I've never fallen foul of such a scam site myself because I tend to be very mistrusting of buying anything online anyway.

I tend to give more credibility to free (none-advertised) sites at the top of a search than sponsored links anyway.

As always buyer beware. However, as the article says there are a number of cloned websites that look indistinguishable from the real one - how does the average person tell the difference if the prices are not cut to an unbelievable level? The first people will know that they've been scammed is when their goods don't show up or their account has been drained.


I never trusted them anyway, not to mention that nothing they sold was ever relevant to me and that for the past few months I have used multiple firefox addons to get rid of every ad.



Celtic_Frost
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 396
Location: Jackson, TN

19 Jan 2010, 1:18 am

Hmmm... I didn't know anyone actually clicked on those "Sponsored Results" links. Crap like that is why every computer should come with Web Of Trust installed into the internet browser. You just cannot trust any search engines, ever. Hell, even the first link that pops up in a search could contain trojans.



Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

19 Jan 2010, 12:38 pm

Can't say I'm surprised, Google is a company focused on pleasing shareholders like any other corporation of it's size.

People do click on the sponsored links though, especially in searches when a lot of people don't think of them as separate from the other results.



Avarice
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,067

19 Jan 2010, 5:57 pm

pakled wrote:
must be why they're not going to censor in China any more...distract people.

that being said, there's billions of sites out there, and no one can check them all on a continuing basis (not even the Chinese government, though wouldn't they want to try...;)

As long as they clean out offenders as reported, that's about all they can do.


I don't know, if every person in China was employed to check websites then they might be able to. There are billions of people in China.



computerlove
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Age: 124
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,791

20 Jan 2010, 12:01 am

Asp-Z wrote:
Can't say I'm surprised, Google is a company focused on pleasing shareholders like any other corporation of it's size.

People do click on the sponsored links though, especially in searches when a lot of people don't think of them as separate from the other results.
seconded. They're in it for the money.


_________________
One of God's own prototypes. Some kind of high powered mutant never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.