Asperger's an adaptation to manage data more effectively?

Page 1 of 3 [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

malakian
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 7
Location: Sydney, Australia

28 Nov 2006, 10:29 am

Is it possible that Asperger's Syndrome is nothing but human evolution? The human attempt at adapting to the exponential increase in technology? All the so-called ‘disadvantages’ seem only to play a significant role in supporting this theory.
I speculate that those with Asperger's syndrome are the result of the human biological attempt at creating a better data storing, retrieving and advancing machine. Coinciding with the functions of modern technology, it’s all about the data and content, and the data flow/sharing.
For example; social interaction:
The social interaction of the neurotypical (NT) and their social ‘rules’, only seem to serve the purpose of delaying the transfer of the important data and information.
Where an NT may, in a party situation, approach a member of the opposite sex in an attempt to communicate with the person, relate to the person, and in effect forming a bond, and, for the sake of an example, attempt to engage in sexual activity with the person, he/she may first communicate non-verbally for a matter of 10 minutes (glances, smiles, eye contact) before then proceeding to interact with them verbally (small talk, mindless irrelevant chit-chat) for another few hours, with the possible addition of physical communication such as dancing and/or holding. The person may THEN proceed to attempt to persuade the member of the opposite sex to return home with them and once there, attempt sexual activity, ergo perpetuating the basic human drive to reproduce, thus validating the whole ‘song and dance’ that NT social interaction truly is.
Now lets ponder what would have played out had one Aspergian, approached another Aspergian. Aspergian ‘A’ might simply walk directly up to Aspergian ‘B’, and, with total disregard for commonly accepted social behavior, ask the member of the opposite sex if he/she would be interested in engaging in sexual activity, as Aspergian ‘A’ may state their physical attraction and arousal for the member of the opposite sex, Aspergian ‘B’. Thus completely disregarding the ‘rules’ of social interaction completely, ergo achieving their goal hundreds of times more efficiently and without useless and irrelevant variables such as ‘his/her favorite colour’ creating any kind of bias.
Although I do not consider human reproduction to be the main factor validating the development of the Aspergic mind, the process remains relevant. In-fact I believe that the reason for the evolution of the human mind and its methods of performing processes is based predominantly on attaining relevant information and transferring it to other processes (computers/people/databases) in order to complete the goal of advancing technology, information and knowledge.
Body language creates bias, it aids to develop a ‘first impression’ with other people. Depending on how good your natural body language skills are, the impression may be good or bad, creating bias on account of something as trivial as minute eye movements and even the act of shaking another person’s hand. Eliminating the need for a first impression, and some technical aspects of body language itself, is an effective method to reduce the amount of bias placed on information or data obtained by another person.
It is known that Aspergians are extremely proficient concerning information technology and sometimes mathematical skills, also aiding the argument that Asperger's is, in-fact, a construct of the human mind, newly designed to better cope and manage the high levels of information dealt with by the average human in modern technological society.

Repetitive behavior is another trait of Aspergian people, possibly due to the well-documented fact that repetition helps to develop memory and information-retaining skills of humans. Aspergians, additionally, have been known to have more advanced memory skills, especially in area of interest to the particular Aspergian, often being able to remember a massive amount of detail regarding the subject. All these traits help to establish that the Aspergian mind was designed for data management.
Aspergians may also share the trait of literal thinking, where the person may interpret speech literally and disregard figurative speech and implied meaning. Again, this only makes the Aspergian construct far more efficient at obtaining and retaining information and data. Metaphors only bias data, as do exaggerations. Similes also create biased data, comparing two things that may, depending on context, be completely irrelevant and incongruent. The basic explanation for this is that an Aspergian is expecting the exact, unbiased, unedited data, which is imperative in processing for attainment of solutions to problems and appropriate reactions to actions.
Aspergians can also be ritualistic, another computer-like trait, an Aspergian’s way of keeping and maintaining systems, systems that, in the Aspergians mind, work the most efficiently.
Aspergians also have exceptional literary skills, yet another sign of efficient and accurate data storage and transfer skills, keeping the data accurate.
Aspergians seem to keep things organised and orderly, often using systems to organise files on their personal computers, books in their library, contacts on their phone, lists of things are commonly kept. All these things are systematic and seemingly designed for interaction with data systems, including other humans.
In conclusion I propose that Asperger's Syndrome is nothing but positive evolution and a more efficient mind-construct.



dgd1788
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Oct 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,335
Location: Indiana, USA

28 Nov 2006, 5:24 pm

It's too long and we're too lazy!


_________________
If great minds think alike, does that mean that stupid minds think differently?


malakian
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 7
Location: Sydney, Australia

28 Nov 2006, 10:14 pm

dgd1788 wrote:
It's too long and we're too lazy!


great



Flagg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,399
Location: Western US

28 Nov 2006, 11:36 pm

Dude, your offically the second most awesome new WP member (After me of course!) I argee completely.


_________________
How good music and bad reasons sound when one marches against an enemy!


malakian
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 7
Location: Sydney, Australia

29 Nov 2006, 12:56 am

Flagg wrote:
Dude, your offically the second most awesome new WP member (After me of course!) I argee completely.


why thank you sir, obviously my theory needs revision and much more reasearch, but its a start. Perhaps you could assist me?



hyperbolic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,869

29 Nov 2006, 1:19 am

I read your theory and I think it has some good observations.

I don't know if there is enough scientific evidence to support your conclusion at this time.

An alternative theory is that the neanderthals had Aspergian traits, and after millenia of assimilation into Homo sapiens, technology and society is drawing individuals with those traits and a higher percentage of genetic data from that lineage together.

Another alternative theory is that Aspergian traits have been present in a small segment of the population since forever but only now is there awareness of the traits as a condition.



Flagg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,399
Location: Western US

29 Nov 2006, 1:26 am

This is a good hypothesis. I'm going to help develop this into a theory.


_________________
How good music and bad reasons sound when one marches against an enemy!


Revenant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 560

29 Nov 2006, 8:18 am

I don't believe in evolution. However, I believe in roles in society and thats where AS comes in.
Lets look at it prehistorically:
Neurotypical males usually become warriors, or food gatherers. Neurotypical females tend to focus on raising children and creating clothing etc etc...
And then, you have the chosen few.
The aspies, who evolve technology to the next level.



Flagg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,399
Location: Western US

29 Nov 2006, 8:51 pm

Revenant wrote:
I don't believe in evolution.


(Twitch)


_________________
How good music and bad reasons sound when one marches against an enemy!


bheid
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 437

30 Nov 2006, 3:57 am

Nice theory; I'm always looking for new ways to expand my superiority complex.

*Adopts theory*



X_Parasite
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2006
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 716
Location: Right here.

01 Dec 2006, 9:55 pm

Very nice, but one problem: Evolution is the result of mutation, mutation doesn't happen as a biological attempt at something, it just happens, and either it works out or it doesn't.

So to all those anti-evolutionists: If there is not evolution, then there is not mutation. If I am not NT because a mutation, then why? If I am simply neorologically different from both my parents, then there is a mutation involved, as nothing could happen to the brain physically that could make me have AS.



Corvus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,674
Location: Calgary

01 Dec 2006, 10:47 pm

This theory can be placed under 'logic' theory, meaning whatever is most logical will happen and will ultimately be the 'code' of which we operate from.

Logic is always the best way and if organizing data is the best way to think then I imagine you will adopt it, personally.

Think of 'Vulcans' as they are logical.

As for it changing with technology or keeping with it - I believe humans invented computers and humans already discovered how to best save the data, through organisation and logical approaches. You could say that humans were before machines and therefore, already changing and that technology was just a bi-product.

Imagine there are 2 universes. There is this one, that we all share, then there is your personal one, inside your skull. What happens in this one is from a decision made in your personal one. You do not effect this universe until your universe tells you to. You can advance this world with machines and rocketships, but there is a personal machine setup for you - your brain. Who is to say that we are living right and that technology is the route to go? Maybe we should be exercising our minds and brains and making them powerful (through meditation, maybe other things we dont know yet, etc.). Our brains have only gotten larger and us more intelligent.

Logically, the mind would mold itself into a logical thinking process. Thinking through a 'feeling' process, may result in choosing less logical responses. Not to be sexist, but roughly 66% of woman and 33% of men use this form of thinking process, through 'feeling' which can sometimes feel extremely illogical. This is a great reason why I, personally, find woman to be illogical where as men are often presented AS logical.

My personal theory on the gap between male and female were the type of evolutionary back grounds they had. Males did the hunting which required extensive thinking and techniques, weaponry and the like. Women, on the other hand, spent more time gathering and doing simple tasks. It may also explain why studies have shown that men are a bit more intelligent (probably based out of logical decision making) and why men out number women on the spectrum 1:2 (or more) as Aspies tend to be logical beings (albeit with SOME feeling processing)

Anyways;
- Ponder about the fact humans discovered technology first. In order to state that we are adapting to our technology, it had to have been there already. We create it after we think it. Repetitiveness has always existed.

Quote:
order to complete the goal of advancing technology, information and knowledge.


BTW, I, personally, don't care about technology. I think humans should be highly intelligent and that their surroundings simply reflect that, meaning we gave technology life, it didn't give us any. The best argument I could support you with is that technology is allowing us more time to better our minds but not that our minds are adapting to it - we made it.

What are we advancing technology for? Go into space? then what? Find new life? Then what? I like to ask 'Why' a lot and I also like to ask 'then what?' It seems like information and knowledge are keys, but technology is just a tool we use to get it.



computerlove
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Age: 124
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,791

02 Dec 2006, 10:25 am

just one question: what about the interaction between an AS with an NT? Sometimes it fails, and that leads us to ¿What are the odds of this "mutation" passed on to the next generation?



willzzz
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 50
Location: West of the Occident, East of the Orient

02 Dec 2006, 9:37 pm

Very thought provoking theory. I totally agree with that Asperger's Syndrome is simply a human evolution of some people like us with AS and that we are more adaptive towards technology and people with AS store/retrieve/query data more efficiently like a computer. Everyones mind thinks and operates in different ways but those with AS are simply better. I sometimes think what's the point of being social in society in some subjects esp. those that are NT.



Flagg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,399
Location: Western US

03 Dec 2006, 2:52 pm

willzzz wrote:
Very thought provoking theory. I totally agree with that Asperger's Syndrome is simply a human evolution of some people like us with AS and that we are more adaptive towards technology and people with AS store/retrieve/query data more efficiently like a computer. Everyones mind thinks and operates in different ways but those with AS are simply better. I sometimes think what's the point of being social in society in some subjects esp. those that are NT.


(Twitch)

It's not a theory! It's a hypothesis!


_________________
How good music and bad reasons sound when one marches against an enemy!


malakian
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 7
Location: Sydney, Australia

03 Dec 2006, 9:35 pm

Flagg wrote:

It's not a theory! It's a hypothesis!


indeed