Replacement for the silicon semiconductor -opinion needed
I am investing in a company that claims to have found a replacement for the silicon semiconductor.
Within the next decade the silicon semiconductor will no long will be viable due to Moore's law.
Someone on a message board expressed skepticism about the company's technology. I emailed investor relations for the company about the skepticism and received an esoteric response.
I was hoping someone could tell me whether the response addressed the skeptical opinion.
Here are the claims by the company.
Utilizing completely standard CMOS fabrication equipment and process steps POET and PET will allow semiconductor manufacturers to make microchips that are far faster and more energy efficient than current silicon devices, and far less expensive to produce.
Key benefits of the POET platform include:
100x speed improvement over CMOS silicon (silicon hits a “power wall” at about 4 GHz that has limited circuit speeds to about 3.2 GHz over the last 10 years)
10-100x power efficiency improvement over CMOS silicon (depending on application)
Flexible application that can be applied to virtually any technical application, including memory, digital/mobile, sensor/laser and electro-optical, among many others
No retrofit or other modifications to existing silicon fabs required – Since POET/PET are CMOS technologies fabricated using standard lithography techniques; they are easily integrated into current semiconductor production facilities extending the profitable utilization of fabrication equipment and production lines that would otherwise be considered at the end of life.
I found a person that was skeptical of the company's technology. He stated the following:
Here is the white paper.
http://www.poet-technologies.com/wp-con ... rcuits.pdf
I sent an email to investor relations about the opinion and received a response that was esoteric to me.
Last edited by KevinLA on 12 Nov 2013, 5:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Thelibrarian
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40a52/40a5250dc4163a35cb216f017ca32e665aed619f" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 5 Aug 2012
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,948
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
"Within the next decade the silicon semiconductor will no long will be viable due to Moore's law."
More properly, I think the above should read: Within the next decade, Moore Law will no longer be viable due to the silicon semiconductor. There are no guarantees that a successor will appear that is both practical and economically feasible. Therefore, betting that there will be a superior successor is just that--a bet.
Bottom line: As one who works hard for his money and doesn't like to gamble with it, I wouldn't touch an investment like this unless I was intimately familiar with this technology and this outfit's business plan.
Nothing has fully replaced it yet, but feasible alternatives are growing in terms of engineering applications. Optical memory & transistor gates are being comprehensively researched and quantum processors are already being tested in large organizations such as Google's. There is no gamble because semiconductors comprise the tools necessary to render themselves obsolete - of course, I could say the same about a lot of tech companies!
_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31ef3/31ef367c05561429fd6831a5d23e73618917ff39" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"
Rule of thumb: if you have to ask, don't risk it. Personally, as tech-literate as I generally am, I wouldn't put any money into these kinds of start-ups, but your mileage may vary.
Reading the opening paragraph to the whitepaper sets off my "BS alarm", but I tend to regard people who use buzzwords and pretentious, overcomplicated language like that as as*holes, due to personal experience.
I agree, they seem to use far too many "hype words" and claim inordinate gains (likely theoretical maximum gains, which can not be fully realized). Also the quality of most silicon fabs is such that a wafer of cores may have a normal circuit error rate that is quite high. Imagine then using this same silicon fab technology with light or photons which are always more sensitive to imperfections than electrons. This is why an entire optical network can be knocked out simply by crushing the fiber optic cable causing internal diffusion and diffraction and creating an impassable signal-to-noise ratio. Take a copper wire cable and stomp on it all you like, it will still work fine (assuming you aren't a neutron star, or wearing ice skates).
Fogman
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57162/571623a02d6e47e1833a78590bad4b25417fcc05" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,986
Location: Frå Nord Dakota til Vermont
GaAs is an expensive material originally intended for professional and military grade components. There has been a trend since the late 1990s to replace many GaAs MMICs by silicon RFICs in consumer and some professional products. A viable replacement for silicon semiconductors is not around the corner. Silicon has its problems but it's cheaper than other III-V compounds for most applications. Organic transistors are a possibility but can they compete effectively with silicon on size, frequency, lifespan, and production costs all at the same time?
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Unpopular Game Character Opinion I need to speak up about |
18 Feb 2025, 10:11 pm |