Page 1 of 1 [ 13 posts ] 

pawelk1986
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,901
Location: Wroclaw, Poland

16 Apr 2014, 11:58 am

A year ago I bought Norton 360 with license for 3 computers.

I paid for it 110 Zloty (36 USD or 26 EUR)

License expires in 3 days, I wonder does again buy Norton or maybe buy Kaspersky?

Does Kaspersky is better than Norton 360



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

16 Apr 2014, 12:10 pm

You should use Avast instead. It's completely free, but still very good.


_________________
“He who controls the spice controls the universe.”


Dantac
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,672
Location: Florida

16 Apr 2014, 12:19 pm

Kaspersky is really good. Problem with it is it literally KILLS your computer performance doing so. I run it only to scan and clean but not to 'protect' my system.

Norton is garbage. Always has been, always will be.



TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

16 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm

Kaspersky has a good reputation, Norton not so good. Kaspersky came with a free trial pre loaded on my Windows 8.1 computer but it is due to expire soon. At that time I'll just uninstall it and switch to Microsoft Essentials which is free.

I dislike Avast as it gives too many false positives for my liking - I got into a wrestling match with it on another machine and in the end it had to go. If you have a lot of custom software, (not used by many people), it tends to err on the side of treating it all as unsafe and stick it in the virus vault. Any software it doesn't recognise gets treated thus. I got sick of telling it that my software isn't a virus and continually fishing it out of the bloody virus vault. I tried to tell it that it was safe but it took me to a website demanding a form be filled with the software publisher's name, website, blah, blah, fuc*ing blah. Screw Avast.


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


pawelk1986
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,901
Location: Wroclaw, Poland

16 Apr 2014, 12:26 pm

Dantac wrote:
Kaspersky is really good. Problem with it is it literally KILLS your computer performance doing so. I run it only to scan and clean but not to 'protect' my system.

Norton is garbage. Always has been, always will be.


Every antivirus slowdown computer, but which one is better, does Norton slow down computer more than Kaspersky?



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

16 Apr 2014, 2:13 pm

Neither. BitDefender outperforms both in independent tests and it is cheaper.



fraudulentzodiac
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 7

16 Apr 2014, 2:57 pm

Free AVG security has always worked well for me.



Dantac
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,672
Location: Florida

16 Apr 2014, 3:19 pm

pawelk1986 wrote:
Dantac wrote:
Kaspersky is really good. Problem with it is it literally KILLS your computer performance doing so. I run it only to scan and clean but not to 'protect' my system.

Norton is garbage. Always has been, always will be.


Every antivirus slowdown computer, but which one is better, does Norton slow down computer more than Kaspersky?


Kaspersky slows it down more. A lot, lot more. The real-time protection it provides is VERY good but its like it literally stops the CPU processes constantly to 'check' every single file the computer uses.

To put it in simple terms: With Kaspersky protection it takes about 10 seconds to load MS WORD. Without it loads in less than 1 second.

Good protection but... its irritating.



TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

16 Apr 2014, 3:34 pm

fraudulentzodiac wrote:
Free AVG security has always worked well for me.


I used that for several years until it got too bloated and slow.


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


pawelk1986
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,901
Location: Wroclaw, Poland

16 Apr 2014, 5:33 pm

Dantac wrote:
pawelk1986 wrote:
Dantac wrote:
Kaspersky is really good. Problem with it is it literally KILLS your computer performance doing so. I run it only to scan and clean but not to 'protect' my system.

Norton is garbage. Always has been, always will be.


Every antivirus slowdown computer, but which one is better, does Norton slow down computer more than Kaspersky?


Kaspersky slows it down more. A lot, lot more. The real-time protection it provides is VERY good but its like it literally stops the CPU processes constantly to 'check' every single file the computer uses.

To put it in simple terms: With Kaspersky protection it takes about 10 seconds to load MS WORD. Without it loads in less than 1 second.

Good protection but... its irritating.


Than, which antivirus provides complete protection and at the same time does not slow down computer?



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

17 Apr 2014, 8:54 am

TallyMan wrote:
Kaspersky has a good reputation, Norton not so good. Kaspersky came with a free trial pre loaded on my Windows 8.1 computer but it is due to expire soon. At that time I'll just uninstall it and switch to Microsoft Essentials which is free.

I dislike Avast as it gives too many false positives for my liking - I got into a wrestling match with it on another machine and in the end it had to go. If you have a lot of custom software, (not used by many people), it tends to err on the side of treating it all as unsafe and stick it in the virus vault. Any software it doesn't recognise gets treated thus. I got sick of telling it that my software isn't a virus and continually fishing it out of the bloody virus vault. I tried to tell it that it was safe but it took me to a website demanding a form be filled with the software publisher's name, website, blah, blah, fuc*ing blah. Screw Avast.


Most modern anti-virus programs use heuristics, and they're never really failsafe. The heuristics sensitivity can be adjusted in Avast. It's never given me any false positives on anything I've programmed, although I mostly use high level languages when programming in Windows.


_________________
“He who controls the spice controls the universe.”


Bodyles
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 2013
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 808
Location: Southern California

17 Apr 2014, 10:16 am

Kurgan wrote:
You should use Avast instead. It's completely free, but still very good.


As a tech I agree whole-heartedly with this.
Avast!, even the free version, is currently the best, and its boot time scan gets out crap those other two can't even touch.
You might want to get a free firewall along with it, but its really great & keeping your (crappy, insecure) Windows box safe.

...or you could just delete the Windows virus infecting your machine, install Linux, and stop worry about that crap. :D :wink: 8)



KB8CWB
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Feb 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 637
Location: West Salem, Ohio

17 Apr 2014, 4:14 pm

Kurgan wrote:
TallyMan wrote:
Kaspersky has a good reputation, Norton not so good. Kaspersky came with a free trial pre loaded on my Windows 8.1 computer but it is due to expire soon. At that time I'll just uninstall it and switch to Microsoft Essentials which is free.

I dislike Avast as it gives too many false positives for my liking - I got into a wrestling match with it on another machine and in the end it had to go. If you have a lot of custom software, (not used by many people), it tends to err on the side of treating it all as unsafe and stick it in the virus vault. Any software it doesn't recognise gets treated thus. I got sick of telling it that my software isn't a virus and continually fishing it out of the bloody virus vault. I tried to tell it that it was safe but it took me to a website demanding a form be filled with the software publisher's name, website, blah, blah, fuc*ing blah. Screw Avast.


Most modern anti-virus programs use heuristics, and they're never really failsafe. The heuristics sensitivity can be adjusted in Avast. It's never given me any false positives on anything I've programmed, although I mostly use high level languages when programming in Windows.


^This! I have programmed for a living and use a wide range of software some of it obscure due to the market share, cost, etc. Once I have set Avast as described above, it works fine. I have yet to get a false positive! And of ALL the packages I have tried, it seems to offer the lowest hit on performance unlike Norton and others. I now use the paid version on ALL my systems and Android platforms. They have a free one which is nearly just as good. It all boils down to preference I suppose but Norton would be the LAST I would ever consider! In all the years I have had Avast I have only ever gotten one infection, a trojan. And it was my fault as I had disabled Avast on something I was programming and it was mucking with the ports. Dumb me forgot to re-enable it afterwards and boom! That fast online and I was infected... :evil: