Fnord wrote:
Geocentric orbits are equatorial - they would not form a "Buckyball" network. Even a 24-hour polar orbit would have the satellite crossing the South Pole 12 hours after it crossed the North Pole.
It doesn't necessarily need to be geocentric, thank you for correcting me, it just needs to be in the "Buckyball" pattern.
RetroGamer87 wrote:
Comets are less predictable due to their elliptical orbits. We may get one that hasn't been near the sun for centuries. Comets are large and bright so it would be easy to stop.
First, not all asteroids have circular orbits, many have elliptical ones. Second, not all comets are large. Third, they're only bright when they get close to the sun. And finally, I don't understand why a comet would be easier to stop than an asteroid.
RetroGamer87 wrote:
Perhaps the worst and most improbable danger would be from the asteroid belt. If one asteroid crossed another's path, it could change it's orbit and send it towards Earth in a few months and in a way that would be difficult to spot via telescope.
That is exactly why we need a system like this, the
Chelyabinsk meteor was undetected before it entered the atmosphere, we know that there are many, many, asteroids that we don't know of and therefore unprepared for.
_________________
I speak on behalf of no-one but myself. For how can I represent anyone else? If someone shares my opinion on a topic, are we now the same person? With the same opinions on all topics? No, of course not.
-Blast335 (me)