Page 1 of 3 [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

NewTime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2015
Posts: 2,017

22 Jul 2015, 11:41 am

Really? If the universe is infinite, how can it get any bigger? If it's infinite, it can't be expanding.



starfox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 2015
Posts: 1,012
Location: United states of Eurasia

22 Jul 2015, 11:43 am

If its infinite it's just 'there'. Infinite can't be measured.


_________________
We become what we think about; since everything in the beginning is just an idea.

Destruction and creation are 2 sides of the same coin.


Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1024
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

22 Jul 2015, 1:38 pm

NewTime wrote:
Really? If the universe is infinite, how can it get any bigger? If it's infinite, it can't be expanding.


What happens when you add 1 to infinity? How about infinity plus infinity?



xenocity
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,282
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan

22 Jul 2015, 6:42 pm

Technically the universe is finite, not infinite.
Everything outside of the universe is nothingness on this plane (other universes is exist in parallel on other planes along side our universe).

They can measure how fast the universe is expanding, due to how fast everything is moving away from the center/each other.
If the universe was contracting, everything would be moving closer together, toward the center.


_________________
Something.... Weird... Something...


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

22 Jul 2015, 9:03 pm

The universe is thought to be finite ( ninety billion light years across). But it might be infinite.

But even if it is infinite you can always add more to infinity.



eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

22 Jul 2015, 11:11 pm

Even though there are infinitely many rational numbers, they are vastly outnumbered by the number of irrational numbers.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,812
Location: Stendec

23 Jul 2015, 6:24 am

Another theory is that the Void is infinite, and that our universe is expanding into it. There may or may not be other universes in the same Void, but they are either too far away for their light to have reached us yet, or they had already decayed into nothingness before our universe came into being.



eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

23 Jul 2015, 12:49 pm

Fnord wrote:
Another theory is that the Void is infinite, and that our universe is expanding into it. There may or may not be other universes in the same Void, but they are either too far away for their light to have reached us yet, or they had already decayed into nothingness before our universe came into being.


By definition, if light or anything else can get from one universe to another, they are the same universe.



zer0netgain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,613

23 Jul 2015, 1:23 pm

Or the mindbender that a subset of infinity is itself infinite even though it's smaller. 8O



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,812
Location: Stendec

23 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm

eric76 wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Another theory is that the Void is infinite, and that our universe is expanding into it. There may or may not be other universes in the same Void, but they are either too far away for their light to have reached us yet, or they had already decayed into nothingness before our universe came into being.
By definition, if light or anything else can get from one universe to another, they are the same universe.
True. The "Raisin Pudding" theory basically states that the infinite "Void" (e.g., the "Multiverse") is a vast volume of space in which a universe (e.g., a "Hubble Volume") might burst into existence at some random location, expand, evolve, die, and eventually decay into a dim mist of subatomic particles. Several universes may coexist in this "Void"; but because they are so far apart the light from our closest neighboring universe would not reach our universe until one or both universes have decayed to quark soup.

This is also called a Type 1 Multiverse in Max Tegmark's Taxonomy of Universes.
Wikipedia wrote:
"... an infinite universe will contain an infinite number of Hubble volumes, all having the same physical laws and physical constants. In regard to configurations such as the distribution of matter, almost all will differ from our Hubble volume. However, because there are infinitely many, far beyond the cosmological horizon, there will eventually be Hubble volumes with similar, and even identical, configurations. ... Given infinite space, there would, in fact, be an infinite number of Hubble volumes identical to ours in the Universe ..."

Source: Wikipedia Article on Multiverse



Jono
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,653
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

23 Jul 2015, 7:49 pm

NewTime wrote:
Really? If the universe is infinite, how can it get any bigger? If it's infinite, it can't be expanding.


Actually, the simplest answer is that the size of the universe does not have to be finite in order to expand because doesn't mean that it's getting "bigger". Thinking that the universe has to expand into something is not really the right way to think about, it's more that empty space is "stretching". In other words, distances between galaxies are getting larger because the space between them is stretching but I can imagine this happening even for an infinite universe.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

23 Jul 2015, 8:02 pm

zer0netgain wrote:
Or the mindbender that a subset of infinity is itself infinite even though it's smaller. 8O



The set of odd numbers is smaller than the set of whole numbers. But both are infinity.



Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1024
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

24 Jul 2015, 8:40 am

Fnord wrote:
This is also called a Type 1 Multiverse in Max Tegmark's Taxonomy of Universes.
Wikipedia wrote:
"... an infinite universe will contain an infinite number of Hubble volumes, all having the same physical laws and physical constants. In regard to configurations such as the distribution of matter, almost all will differ from our Hubble volume. However, because there are infinitely many, far beyond the cosmological horizon, there will eventually be Hubble volumes with similar, and even identical, configurations. ... Given infinite space, there would, in fact, be an infinite number of Hubble volumes identical to ours in the Universe ..."

Source: Wikipedia Article on Multiverse


Which logically means an infinite number of Fnords and infinities of near-Fnord variants in nearly identical hubble volumes...

Something entertaining to think about.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,812
Location: Stendec

24 Jul 2015, 8:45 am

Adamantium wrote:
Fnord wrote:
This is also called a Type 1 Multiverse in Max Tegmark's Taxonomy of Universes.
Wikipedia wrote:
"... an infinite universe will contain an infinite number of Hubble volumes, all having the same physical laws and physical constants. In regard to configurations such as the distribution of matter, almost all will differ from our Hubble volume. However, because there are infinitely many, far beyond the cosmological horizon, there will eventually be Hubble volumes with similar, and even identical, configurations. ... Given infinite space, there would, in fact, be an infinite number of Hubble volumes identical to ours in the Universe ..."
Source: Wikipedia Article on Multiverse
Which logically means an infinite number of Fnords and infinities of near-Fnord variants in nearly identical hubble volumes ... Something entertaining to think about.
Somewhere out there may be a variant of me that is popular, incredibly wealthy, in perfect health, and has the physique of Clark Kent.



AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

24 Jul 2015, 8:50 am

xenocity wrote:
Technically the universe is finite, not infinite....

Then, what exists outside it?


_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)


eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

24 Jul 2015, 8:53 am

naturalplastic wrote:
zer0netgain wrote:
Or the mindbender that a subset of infinity is itself infinite even though it's smaller. 8O



The set of odd numbers is smaller than the set of whole numbers. But both are infinity.


It is very easy to map the set of whole numbers onto the odd numbers and the odd numbers onto the whole numbers.

Therefore, there is a 1:1 correspondence between the two sets and thus both have the same number of elements.

Consider this:

The odd numbers are the positive integers not divisible by 2: { 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, ... }
The Whole numbers are the postive integers and 0: { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... }

Let O be the set of odd numbers and W be the set of whole numbers.

Define f :W->O by f(x)=2x+1 for all x in W. Since for every x in W, there is an f(x) in W, we have that |O| >= |W|.

Define g:O->W by g(y)=(y-1)/2 for all y in O. Since for every y in O, there is a g(y) in W, we have that |O|<=|W|.

Thus, |O|=|W|.