This application seems to be installed (or installable) on a lot of operating systems and platforms, including Windows and Linux, and I've noticed it tends to get glowing reviews, often being rated the best of its kind. It's certainly pretty powerful and versatile, having many more features than the average media player, but my own experiences with it have sometimes been disappointing.
It plays dvds and video files excellently on the whole, but seems to struggle really badly with 'home-made' recordings on -R, RW dvds and the like, or files transferred from those sources. Playback tends to be badly pixellated and freezes frequently, making the material unwatchable. 'Lesser' media players, like mpv, gmerlin, MPC and others have no problems in this area.
VLC also has the capacity to do screen recordings as well, but every attempt I've made to use this facility has resulted in pictures but no sound. This seems to be a common experience, and the 'fixes' are very complicated and apparently don't work, according to most comments I've read.
It can also download material from YouTube, and I've successfully used it for this purpose myself, to test it. The process however is very complex and time-consuming, compared with straightforward applications like the excellent 4K Video Downloader.
It seems also that in the USA, VLC can't even be used for playing standard commercial dvds, because of the DMCA legislation and copyright situation, or is that perhaps a misinterpretation of the situation?
Finally, VLC's terms and conditions appear to give it the right to snoop on users' playlists and send data to the producers or copyright holders of the products. Not a great advert for 'open source' - what would Richard Stallman make of that?
Am I being overcritical of VLC? What do other users think?
_________________
On a mountain range
I'm Doctor Strange