singularitymadam wrote:
Thanks for the link--and your input. It had never occurred to me that people wouldn't like interacting with machines.
I do enjoy reading books & articles, though-that's what I was raised on, not high-tech gizmos. Some of my frustration with machines is based on the problems they have when things don't go routinely-which seems an inevitable occurrence & I don't like being the person who can't figure out how to make the blasted thing function properly. At least, with a "real live person" I can ask "how" or "what" when I get stuck & confused by mechanical operations or unsure of interpretation & meaning of terms (esp. when an employee knows how to deal with some ghastly contraption that's utterly beyond my understanding). Apparently ASD dx is associated with being mechanically inclined or computer skilled, but I'm not...
singularitymadam wrote:
I just thought it would be easier since there isn't as much to decipher.
It's not an absolute, it depends on so many variables of people involved as well as the specifics of an inanimate yet interactive object. I prefer to read about certain things rather than have a person explain-in other cases, I need active hands-on working with another person.
Sorry, it's tough being specific-but emotionally/intellectually/mentally intense information can be "over-stimulating" and I can't absorb the info. with someone else around, his/her presence distracts/detracts (what each person considers to be emotionally overwhelming is different, of course). There are also things that don't make enough sense on their own, the ideas need a person to illustrate how a concept is applied & brainstorm with me for examples. So, it depends.
_________________
*"I don't know what it is, but I know what it isn't."*