yesplease wrote:
ma_137 wrote:
We've gotten up to 28mpg out of this setup, which is a far cry over the 21mpg the car comes with stock. These are numbers recorded out of boost, cruising at 70mph. In boost its another story, but who records economy numbers when you are doing 100+ anyway?
There's no reason ya can't do better. Like, say,
~40mpg@150mph. Given what's available today, there's also no reason imo why fast and fuel efficient can't coexist, w/ some compromises elsewhere of course. I'd love to screw around with something twin engined when I finally work up a decent budget (~$5-10k) to use. I think 100mpg/10s quarter mile would be nifty, and well within reach.
possibly, but not within my budget. The next car I'm doing is a turbo diesel light pickup truck for around town runs. I'd like to perk it up, but it will be nowhere near the performance of the car I'm running now. However, it will be a damn sight more economical. Otto-cycle engines definatley aren't that fuel efficient, but for the price to power ratio, it is hard to beat one!
A hybird in the future would be something fun to try, but the price of batteries, in-hub electric motors and speed controllers will have to come waaaay down first. As for now, I'll work on continuing to port the cyl heads, looking for more efficient turbo chargers and adding small things like hydrogen boost and tight squish motors with combustion chamber grooves to extract all the power and efficiency I can from this little 4 banger.