Page 1 of 1 [ 15 posts ] 

LostInEmulation
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,047
Location: Ireland, dreaming of Germany

11 Sep 2008, 2:35 pm

I have a really strange PC problem: My PC does not change into graphics mode from the bootmanager and when I start a sufficiently advanced OS, the graphical display is strange as if garbage was included into each character description. It works again when the OS (Gentoo Linux) sets its own console font. Exchanging the graphics card did not work, neither did replacing it with a PCI-based one (sufficiently ancient not to have any cooling). While X works as well, it is for me really scary to boot the PC like this. Also I fear hardware failure of some sort. Can you guys and gals help me localizing the problem? Is the BIOS FUBAR? Normally text mode always works, no matter how crappy the state of the computer, but it now seems only to work in the BIOS and in DOS unless explicitly resetted.


_________________
I am not a native speaker. Please contact me if I made grammatical mistakes in the posting above.

Penguins cannot fly because what cannot fly cannot crash!


shugo974
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2007
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 330
Location: New York, USA

11 Sep 2008, 2:41 pm

try changing the color or see i there is a regestry checker on linux if there is any problem it will fix it. I only know about the regestry checker on windows (I know almost nothing about linux but it's a suggestion)



Keith
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,321
Location: East Sussex, UK

11 Sep 2008, 2:45 pm

I don't think Linux has the problematic registry hell of Windows.

I would check to ensure the graphics drivers are up to date and working. General rule is: it's only broken when it's NOT working, ie you can't see anything unless you change the graphics card.

IF you've just replaced the graphics card you may need to install drivers for that to work fully



LostInEmulation
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,047
Location: Ireland, dreaming of Germany

11 Sep 2008, 2:48 pm

shugo974 wrote:
try changing the color or see i there is a regestry checker on linux if there is any problem it will fix it. I only know about the regestry checker on windows (I know almost nothing about linux but it's a suggestion)


It can't be a registry/OS failure since it also happens with live CDs. Also the bootmanager (which is not shown at all) fails to show because it uses some form of graphics. Maybe it's not relevant, but I tried the PCI card first with the vesa-driver and X.org said it couldn't set the graphics mode.


_________________
I am not a native speaker. Please contact me if I made grammatical mistakes in the posting above.

Penguins cannot fly because what cannot fly cannot crash!


shugo974
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2007
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 330
Location: New York, USA

11 Sep 2008, 2:48 pm

like i said in my post I know almost nothing about linux other that not many viruses are written for the OS



Pikachu
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,434
Location: half way up a big hill

11 Sep 2008, 4:34 pm

LostInEmulation wrote:
I have a really strange PC problem: My PC does not change into graphics mode from the bootmanager and when I start a sufficiently advanced OS, the graphical display is strange as if garbage was included into each character description. It works again when the OS (Gentoo Linux) sets its own console font. Exchanging the graphics card did not work, neither did replacing it with a PCI-based one (sufficiently ancient not to have any cooling). While X works as well, it is for me really scary to boot the PC like this. Also I fear hardware failure of some sort. Can you guys and gals help me localizing the problem? Is the BIOS FUBAR? Normally text mode always works, no matter how crappy the state of the computer, but it now seems only to work in the BIOS and in DOS unless explicitly resetted.
If it has done this over multiple graphics cards and you have tried booting up with Live CDs, I, unless I'm wrong, suspect something wrong somewhere, maybe worth looking at BIOS settings as I don't know what else to suggest other than the things you've so far tried


_________________
Thanks Tinkerbell.

Allegedly away with the fairies for 6-7 years


LostInEmulation
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,047
Location: Ireland, dreaming of Germany

11 Sep 2008, 5:05 pm

Pikachu wrote:
If it has done this over multiple graphics cards

Indeed, 1 PCI and 2 AGP ones behaved exactly alike in this respect.
Pikachu wrote:
and you have tried booting up with Live CDs,

*buntus, damnsmall, various magazine CDs.
Pikachu wrote:
I, unless I'm wrong, suspect something wrong somewhere, maybe worth looking at BIOS settings as I don't know what else to suggest other than the things you've so far tried

Where specifically? I vaguely pondered updating the BIOS, but think it's too risky.


_________________
I am not a native speaker. Please contact me if I made grammatical mistakes in the posting above.

Penguins cannot fly because what cannot fly cannot crash!


SpiceWolf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 802

11 Sep 2008, 5:20 pm

Does your bios have a "reset to factory defaults" option?
If so it might be worth trying.

L.



lau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,749
Location: Somerset UK

11 Sep 2008, 5:41 pm

I take it this is a desktop, as you're talking in terms of graphics cards.

Althogh I doubt it would help, the BIOS can usually be reset by moving a jumper link, on the motherboard, temporarily, then putting it back where it started. It should be fairly clearly silk-screened onto the mobo, near the battery (the flat disc).

Juggling graphics cards sounds more like your problem. If there is onboard graphics, the BIOS may have an option to disable that, when using a card. Getting a conflict going between onboard graphics and plug-in cards.... not nice.

Another thought - have you let memtest have a quick run, just to check that you don't have any problem there? That can also result in a whole range of "odd" behaviours.


_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer


LostInEmulation
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,047
Location: Ireland, dreaming of Germany

11 Sep 2008, 5:46 pm

lau wrote:
I take it this is a desktop, as you're talking in terms of graphics cards.

It is! Linux has been ready for the desktop for me since 1998 :wink:

lau wrote:
Althogh I doubt it would help, the BIOS can usually be reset by moving a jumper link, on the motherboard, temporarily, then putting it back where it started. It should be fairly clearly silk-screened onto the mobo, near the battery (the flat disc).


Not really an option since I doubt to be able to find a specific jumper there, my eyes aren't the best ones.

lau wrote:
Juggling graphics cards sounds more like your problem. If there is onboard graphics, the BIOS may have an option to disable that, when using a card. Getting a conflict going between onboard graphics and plug-in cards.... not nice.


The system has no onboard graphics card.

lau wrote:
Another thought - have you let memtest have a quick run, just to check that you don't have any problem there? That can also result in a whole range of "odd" behaviours.

Can I start it from DOS bootfloppy or via similar nongraphic methods? Live CDs all have graphic bootmanagers. :?


_________________
I am not a native speaker. Please contact me if I made grammatical mistakes in the posting above.

Penguins cannot fly because what cannot fly cannot crash!


lau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,749
Location: Somerset UK

12 Sep 2008, 5:55 am

The package "memtest86+" that comes as standard with Ubuntu, etc, installs the following:
/usr/bin/make-memtest86+-boot-floppy

So, I inserted a writeable floppy, typed "make-m<tab><enter><enter>" and away it went. Moved the floppy to other machines (one without a keyboard, even), inserted it and rebooted.

I now have that memtest86+ running on three other machines, all of which seem fine. (It's quite a nice idea to run a serious memory test, once in a while.)

============

The BIOS reset - my eyes are no better, I'm sure! I use a magnifying glass to read the mobo. Them generally fumble with the jumper multiple times before I manage to remove/relocate it.

============

Hm. The race is on...

My Toshiba T2130CS, Intel 486DX4, Memory 8000K, completed a pass in 11 minutes.

The Compaq Armada 4220T, Pentium-MMX 267.3MHz, L1 16K 171MB/s, Memory 96M 145MB/s, is at 37% after 13 minutes.

The home build Sempron (0.09) 1800MHz, L1 128K 14,755MB/s, L2 128K 1,273 MB/s, Memory 991M 1,278MB/s, Chipset AMD 8000 (ECC:Disabled), RAM:163MHz (DDR327)/CAS:3-3-3-7/DDR-1 (64 bits) is at 77% after 24 minutes.


_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer


Last edited by lau on 12 Sep 2008, 12:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.

lau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,749
Location: Somerset UK

12 Sep 2008, 6:26 am

PS. Memtest86+ full pass timings:

11 minutes for the 8000Kbyte Toshiba.
40 minutes for the 96 Mbyte Compaq.
28 minutes for the 991Mbyte home build.

Make of that what you will. I feel it means that the ancient 486 wasn't that bad a beast.


_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer


Last edited by lau on 12 Sep 2008, 12:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Fraya
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,337

12 Sep 2008, 11:02 am

Id try replacing the power supply (a weakening PSU that doesn't put out quite the wattage it used to can cause strange graphical problems due to low voltage across the buses).

If that doesn't work the only thing left is the motherboard.

lau wrote:
PS. Memtest86+ full pass timings:

11 minutes for the 8000Kbyte Toshiba.
40 minutes for the 96 Mbyte Compaq.
28 minutes for the 991Mbyte home build.

Make of that what you will. I feel it means that the ancient 486 wasn't that bad a beast.


I think it just means that the size/clock ratio for the toshiba was the best not that it necessarily performed any better (IE 64MB will complete the test long before a 2GB stick).


_________________
One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
-----------
"White Rabbit" - Jefferson Airplane


lau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,749
Location: Somerset UK

12 Sep 2008, 1:01 pm

The power supply idea is another good suggestion, although a marginal problem with power would be unlikely to manifest in the same way when switching graphics boards.

A thought, there, is to unplug any extra boards that may be present, to see if that alters the symptoms.

====================

Oh... I took a liberty, and edited not only my messages, but your quote of me, Fraya. I'd left out a "0" in the Toshiba's memory size. (Which I'm pretty sure is clocked at 75MHz). (The Tosh is closer to 12 minutes per pass.)

I suppose the first pair, we have memory x12, speed x3 and test duration x4. That's not wildly unexpected, but seems to hint that the 486 was no worse an architecture that the Pentium.

The second pair, the memory is 10x, the speed 7x, but the test duration has gone down a little. The Sempron is a better architecture than the Pentium?

(The Tosh is closer to 12 minutes per pass.)

Just some waffle. Having run all three memory tests for 7 1/2 hours, with no errors, I may stop them soon.


_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer


olle
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2008
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 157

15 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm

Sorry I haven't replied until now. I've been offline a lot and forgot to reply. Anyway, this looks like a kernel problem. It only happens with certain kernel versions, certain hardware, and most importantly certain graphic modes.

I had a similar problem with my Asus motherboard and Nvidia Geforce 6?00 desktop for quite long time now. The kernel would hang during boot, and i would get weird colored dots on the screen instead of text. But since one particular kernel upgrade it works fine again. Though, it does not work if you just get the kernel sources and compile. I think you need some distro patches or just the ordinary distro kernel. Myself I'm using (K)ubuntu.

It has only happened to me with the higher resolution graphic modes. In GRUB, try to edit the kernel command line. If there's alreay a vga= option, change it to "vga=normal" or if there is no such option create "vga=normal".

That way, the console font will be too large, and crappy, but hey, it's better than no font at all. Try to mess with the vga option til it looks alright.