Shiggily wrote:
"It was the first time in the world that it was possible to visualize what people see directly from the brain activity"
I think it is a measure of brain activity directly related to sight. It doesn't read minds and I don't think it even can picture dreams, since I don't think dream images are related to the area of the brain that they are using. Unless someone has proof that dreams activate the same areas of the brain as eyesight does.
It is just another example of over-hyping science.
Though I find the confines of the study to be interesting, the claims are not accurate.
They didn't make any unfounded claims about it, those parts were just speculation of the future possibilities of this research. At this point, it has no practical application, it is strictly a research tool. They said that what it is doing is measuring brain activity related to sight. Specifically, it's trying to decode the raw image that your brain receives from your retina. It's the image prior to brain doing a LOT of processing on it.