Janissy wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Jack and Rose are fictitious. .
That right there is the only important thing. Analysing their actions as though they were actual people instead of narrative contructs is silly and illogical. Their actions were not based on what works best in reality. Their actions were based on what a writer thought would best move the plot along.
I've sat at the cafeteria table listening to my coworkers actually get upset about the "thoughtless" actions of a sitcom character. I've wanted to scream, "he said those terrible things because the writer put it in the script to get you to watch the show-it's not real". I thought people here were immune to that silliness but no. Yeesh!
+ A billion points!! !
Makes the point that it's just a movie. Though I think Jack's death really helps the movie in terms of emotion and depth. I was spoiled as to what happened (the death, not the sinking
) before I finally saw this film. I didnt really care that I was spoiled about Jack's death but I will admit it made me all the more intrigued to watch out just to find out how he died.
And if you guys want to watch a ridiculous film adaptation of the Titanic watched the TV minieseries version with Tim Curry and Catherine Zeta-Jones. It has a strange combination of inaccuracies, theories, and little things that the James Cameron film doesnt cover.