mesona wrote:
No and here is why.
The book is a remake of the anime battle royale.
The main is almost always in a type of fog....I mean it half the time I think she likes drugs.
The characters were very flat.
The battles were played up as epic bloody but the ones we see sound childish.
At the end a movie like thing being made is one step away from these typed of real life battles from happening....
No... it's not...
Novel: Manga: anime: then live action film...
I feel there is no comparison except that children are killing each other...
The battle royal series (which I have both read and watched) is a hypersexual, psychoviolent rampage with many terrifying portrayals of familial misuse and abuse. It was a an indictment o fthe culture that the author grew up in. There is an "It is better to suffer than make a scene" ethos in the culture that he was condemning. Further, an entire class was selected. It was ENTIRELY ratings driven. The class was not chosen at random. It was picked specifically for its ability to create a spectacle.
Hunger games is an indictment of a different sort, one against a government that was so horrible that over 2/3 of the country rebelled and lost. Now the richer of the people has to keep these people in check. Random choosing for the first book. An attempt to wipe out a revolutionary leader...
It is a subtle, but key difference...
Further, Suzanne Collins insists she had never read/seen/heard of it. It would be suicide for an author to plagiarize an idea like this. I suspect she is not that stupid.
_________________
Yeah. I'm done. Don't bother messaging and expecting a response - i've left WP permanently.