The Walking Dead Season 5!! !! !! !! !! !

Page 4 of 7 [ 100 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

02 Nov 2014, 10:15 pm

YippySkippy wrote:
I never understod the Governor's motivation for keeping the zombie heads in jars. Just trophies? It didn't really seem to fit his character.

The Terminus folks didn't make complete sense to me, either. I understand them fearing and even hating people, but luring them in and eating them? Nah. There was even a pile of stuffed animals indicating they murdered children. I just don't see a group of people who started out kind going THAT far the other way, regardless of what happened to them.


I think that was just them trying to sell him as some sociopath because otherwise he would come off even more morally ambiguous compared to Rick's crew. It is pretty dumb when you think about how jarring it was to Michonne when she herself kept walkers on leash and she explained later that she discovered later on that it repelled them which also doesn't make a lot of sense but it is a TV show...



GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

04 Nov 2014, 7:11 pm

Klowglas wrote:
Zombies project that feeling of impending doom. Humans/human conflict don't really project that sort of feeling. It's like in the movies, when they are stuck in the barn/house and the hordes of zombies are waiting outside. That is the zombie experience that they should be focusing on, humans don't project that feeling at all. and plus, there are so many shows on television that focus on human/human conflicts, it rally losses what makes it unique when they decide to focus on them.

It would still remain interesting over several seasons too because it is survival after all, and there's so many ways you can pull the rabbit out of that hat...in the first season it was survival in that high-rise, then it was survival in the campsite, then it was survival on the freeway, then in the farn-house...they were perpetually running from the zombies (not humans) for their dear lives.

and that's not to say that there shouldn't be no human/human conflicts, but that it shouldn't be the focus point. The zombies need to be the greatest and most terrifying force in the series, when they make the humans more formidable, the feeling of impending doom and "all is lost, we're only holding on for as long as we can" completely goes away.

In Woodbury, it seemed clear to me that the creators/writers were focusing on an opposite philosophy. It stopped being a show about zombies after that, and it seems like it remained that way, shame as I really used to enjoy the series.


I understand your point. I think it's fine to concentrate on humans vs zombies in movies, but I still think it's a bit too limited for a TV show. I mean, just look at your own examples... they went through ALL those situations in just one season (or so). That sort of thing gets really stale after a while when you're dealing with the same characters week after week.

The zombies are still 'forces of nature' in the show, but humans are necessary for interesting villains... Even in the comics, Kirkman gave up on having zombies as the main threat about 3 years in...

I can tell you, if the series continues to follow the comics, humans will continue to be the main villains from here on out.

Sorry.


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


danothan24
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 118

04 Nov 2014, 10:20 pm

Well, The Walking Dead (tv show and comics) really weren't ever about zombies...they're about what happens when society as we know it collapses, and what savage critters we humans really are. Zombies are just a plot/thematic device. It's pretty inevitable that the zombies eventually become secondary, but it's not like they're gone. Hell, just 2 episodes ago a fairly major character succumbed to a bit.

As for the overall quality of the show, I have a bit of a love/hate relationship with it. There are stretches of freaking brilliance (the first half of season 4), but there are also some spectacularly dull stretches. The female characters in particular have been pretty horribly written in the past. A lot of the Lori hate came from how inconsistent she was. One week she's heavily implying to Rick that Shane needs to be taken care of, the next week she's in love with Shane. It was ridiculous. Andrea was always pretty annoying, and it was painful for comic readers who knew how badass the character could have been--Carol, who was a fairly unmemorable part of the comics, ended up taking on a lot of those traits. Michonne was a bit of a caricature early on, but she improved dramatically over season 4 once she got past the angry silent stage. As for Carl, he annoyed the hell out of me early on, but he's getting more tolerable now. To be fair I'm not exactly a kid person. And of course there's the people like T-Dogg, who never really get fleshed out, so we don't give a damn when they die. On a show like this, every death should be significant.

I still keep up with the show because there are times where it's just great, but there are also a lot of stretches where it gets almost insultingly dumb and heavy-handed, or just plain boring. I also try to not judge it based off the comics since they're so different at this point, but it does get frustrating how there are times where the show doesn't seem willing to go far enough with the premise. A perfect example is the handling of

Spoiler wrote:
Baby Judith, who in the comics died pretty horribly back at the prison.
At the end of the day, this is a HORROR story, and it's supposed to be bleak and hopeless. I don't know if it's the writers being scared or the AMC producers not allowing them to go to certain places, but at times it seems like the show puts too much focus on the action and gore and not enough on the true terror of what's happening.

Overall, it's still one of the best shows on tv...but it definitely hasn't lived up to its full potential.


_________________
Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. --George Carlin


danothan24
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 118

04 Nov 2014, 10:27 pm

Jacoby wrote:
YippySkippy wrote:
I never understod the Governor's motivation for keeping the zombie heads in jars. Just trophies? It didn't really seem to fit his character.

The Terminus folks didn't make complete sense to me, either. I understand them fearing and even hating people, but luring them in and eating them? Nah. There was even a pile of stuffed animals indicating they murdered children. I just don't see a group of people who started out kind going THAT far the other way, regardless of what happened to them.


I think that was just them trying to sell him as some sociopath because otherwise he would come off even more morally ambiguous compared to Rick's crew. It is pretty dumb when you think about how jarring it was to Michonne when she herself kept walkers on leash and she explained later that she discovered later on that it repelled them which also doesn't make a lot of sense but it is a TV show...

Wrong. They didn't repel the zombies, they masked her scent/helped her blend in. Kind of like how they will occasionally cover themselves with guts to wander through a herd. There's a ton of dumb choices and inconsistencies on this show, but the zombie pets were pretty solid. Maybe they didn't explain them, I don't fully remember from that long ago.


_________________
Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist. --George Carlin


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

05 Nov 2014, 2:29 am

danothan24 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
YippySkippy wrote:
I never understod the Governor's motivation for keeping the zombie heads in jars. Just trophies? It didn't really seem to fit his character.

The Terminus folks didn't make complete sense to me, either. I understand them fearing and even hating people, but luring them in and eating them? Nah. There was even a pile of stuffed animals indicating they murdered children. I just don't see a group of people who started out kind going THAT far the other way, regardless of what happened to them.


I think that was just them trying to sell him as some sociopath because otherwise he would come off even more morally ambiguous compared to Rick's crew. It is pretty dumb when you think about how jarring it was to Michonne when she herself kept walkers on leash and she explained later that she discovered later on that it repelled them which also doesn't make a lot of sense but it is a TV show...

Wrong. They didn't repel the zombies, they masked her scent/helped her blend in. Kind of like how they will occasionally cover themselves with guts to wander through a herd. There's a ton of dumb choices and inconsistencies on this show, but the zombie pets were pretty solid. Maybe they didn't explain them, I don't fully remember from that long ago.


but why don't they still go after her? it doesn't really make a lot of sense but regardless, the point was that she didn't even know it had that effect until after she did that so for her to pass judgement on the Governor because he kept walker heads in jars seems kind of odd.



raisedbyignorance
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,225
Location: Indiana

06 Nov 2014, 5:44 pm

I'd like to share an author's note from Robert Kirkman himself, the creator of the comic, who had this note published in Issue #1.

Quote:
I'm not trying to scare anybody. If that somehow happens as a result of reading this comic that's great, but really... that's not what this book is about. What you now hold in your hands is the most serious piece of work I've done so far in my career. I'm the guy that created Battle Pope; I hope you guys realize what a stretch this is for me. It's really not that hard to believe me when you realize that I'm diving into subject matter that is so utterly serious and dramatic.

Zombies.

To me, the best zombie movies aren't the splatter fests of gore and violence with goofy characters and tongue in cheek antics. Good zombies movies show us how messed up we are, they make us question our station in society... and our society's station in the world. They show us gore and violence and all that cool stuff too... but there's always an undercurrent of social commentary and thoughtfulness. That's what makes Romero films so great.

With "The Walking Dead" I want to explore how people deal with extreme situations and how these events CHANGE them. I'm in this for the long haul, and I'm pretty sure Tony is too. You guy are going to see Rick change and mature to the point that when you look back on this issue you won't even recognize him. I hope you guys are looking forward to a sprawling epic, because that's the idea of this one.

So, if anything scares you... great. But this is NOT a horror book. I like the term "survivalist adventure." I think that one works well with what we're trying to do. This book is more about watching Rick survive than it is about watching zombies pop around the corner and scare you. I hope that's what you guys are into.



GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

06 Nov 2014, 6:14 pm

raisedbyignorance wrote:
I'd like to share an author's note from Robert Kirkman himself, the creator of the comic, who had this note published in Issue #1.

Quote:
I'm not trying to scare anybody. If that somehow happens as a result of reading this comic that's great, but really... that's not what this book is about. What you now hold in your hands is the most serious piece of work I've done so far in my career. I'm the guy that created Battle Pope; I hope you guys realize what a stretch this is for me. It's really not that hard to believe me when you realize that I'm diving into subject matter that is so utterly serious and dramatic.

Zombies.

To me, the best zombie movies aren't the splatter fests of gore and violence with goofy characters and tongue in cheek antics. Good zombies movies show us how messed up we are, they make us question our station in society... and our society's station in the world. They show us gore and violence and all that cool stuff too... but there's always an undercurrent of social commentary and thoughtfulness. That's what makes Romero films so great.

With "The Walking Dead" I want to explore how people deal with extreme situations and how these events CHANGE them. I'm in this for the long haul, and I'm pretty sure Tony is too. You guy are going to see Rick change and mature to the point that when you look back on this issue you won't even recognize him. I hope you guys are looking forward to a sprawling epic, because that's the idea of this one.

So, if anything scares you... great. But this is NOT a horror book. I like the term "survivalist adventure." I think that one works well with what we're trying to do. This book is more about watching Rick survive than it is about watching zombies pop around the corner and scare you. I hope that's what you guys are into.


Best. Post. EVAR!!1!!


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

07 Nov 2014, 5:37 pm

Zombies have never really been specifically about zombies, the best movies are always about the people put in that situation. I watched the original Day Of The Dead again not too long ago and it's easy to see the parallel between Captain Rhodes and The Governor on The Walking Dead.



NeueZiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,330
Location: Kapustin Yar

08 Nov 2014, 2:13 am

So Season 5 is really good? I'm late to the walking dead boat and just marathoned season 1,2,3 and I'm at the halfway point of season 4 but 4 feels like such a downer. I think two seasons in the prison was a bit too long maybe and I'm just ready for new stuff. Perhaps I'll force myself to finish through s4 this weekend, I'm really not feeling American Horror Story right now (but that could changed).


Oh yeah. If Daryl dies we riot.



raisedbyignorance
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,225
Location: Indiana

08 Nov 2014, 1:44 pm

NeueZiel wrote:
So Season 5 is really good? I'm late to the walking dead boat and just marathoned season 1,2,3 and I'm at the halfway point of season 4 but 4 feels like such a downer. I think two seasons in the prison was a bit too long maybe and I'm just ready for new stuff. Perhaps I'll force myself to finish through s4 this weekend, I'm really not feeling American Horror Story right now (but that could changed).


Oh yeah. If Daryl dies we riot.


Season 4 is a matter of opinion, I guess. I like the second half where we get individual time with certain characters.

If you get through that, be prepared for what's so far been a dark and intense season 5. It might be too soon to call but this could be the show's best season yet.



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

08 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm

I wasn't really enjoying this season until last week's episode. I like it when they slow the pace a little and develop characters.



Security_Code
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2014
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 106

09 Nov 2014, 11:53 am

the hunters arc was perfect wasn't as good with out a specific blonde character though. she's supposed to be the sniper of ricks group. :cry:

not sure what to think of the new hospital arc its a cool new area and story, think they are doing some of the prison story light they left out of the previous seasons. which the characters present now are replacing was was supposed to be woodburry in the comics. not as cool with out the governor. but I guess its nice to split up the story a bit no real strong characters I enjoy in the hospital hopefully the main group story will start again tonight.



alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,216
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

09 Nov 2014, 11:59 am

I'm liking season 5. Although I do agree that the terminus plot is quite a bit far-fetched.


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social


raisedbyignorance
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,225
Location: Indiana

09 Nov 2014, 4:55 pm

Security_Code wrote:
the hunters arc was perfect wasn't as good with out a specific blonde character though. she's supposed to be the sniper of ricks group. :cry:


The writing of Andrea's character on the TV show had too many problems from the start. I feel that the show waited too long to have her develop into a fighter. And while she was just getting started, Lori was getting on her too much about it all, and that's just because Lori had her head stuck up her butt. I didn't like how emotionally messed up they made Andrea after her sister died. I mean, I get it, but come on, there were just some moments in season 2 particularly where she was just being plain stupid, doing things that her comic counterpart would have been much wiser about. They MIGHT have had a chance to atone her character with season 3, but if you watch season 3...well... Like I said, too many problems in the writing of her character that even the Honest Trailer referred to her as: "the last person you want to be stuck in a zombie apocalypse with".

TV!Carol is no Comic!Andrea but she is a good enough alternative, especially after 5x01. We should thank all our lucky stars that they didn't make Carol like her comic counterpart cuz her comic counterpart was just a few screws loose of crazy.



Security_Code
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2014
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 106

09 Nov 2014, 5:59 pm

raisedbyignorance wrote:
Security_Code wrote:
the hunters arc was perfect wasn't as good with out a specific blonde character though. she's supposed to be the sniper of ricks group. :cry:


The writing of Andrea's character on the TV show had too many problems from the start. I feel that the show waited too long to have her develop into a fighter. And while she was just getting started, Lori was getting on her too much about it all, and that's just because Lori had her head stuck up her butt. I didn't like how emotionally messed up they made Andrea after her sister died. I mean, I get it, but come on, there were just some moments in season 2 particularly where she was just being plain stupid, doing things that her comic counterpart would have been much wiser about. They MIGHT have had a chance to atone her character with season 3, but if you watch season 3...well... Like I said, too many problems in the writing of her character that even the Honest Trailer referred to her as: "the last person you want to be stuck in a zombie apocalypse with".

TV!Carol is no Comic!Andrea but she is a good enough alternative, especially after 5x01. We should thank all our lucky stars that they didn't make Carol like her comic counterpart cuz her comic counterpart was just a few screws loose of crazy.


both lori, and andrea were horibbly written, lori was a bit boring in the comics but not annoying, just a character. nothing remotely interesting, andrea is one of my favorites from the comics I love her character in the newer arcs shes one of my favorite fictional female characters atm, so I was let down by her in the tv show as well shes a bad ass in the comics idiot in the show. just bad writing and acting I guess.

andrea in season two was just really annoying and edgy, season three, I kind of liked her being shipped with the governor but she should have been a better character the writing was just bad. really liked how iconic the governors fight with the prison was, but tbh it wasn't as good as in the comics either, there should have been more casualties rick's side. it was insanely disappointing for me, even though I loved the governors story and arcs before it.

terminus was a bit over the topi its probably what they wanted for a big final and a big opening though. its kind of weird they are doing what was a prison story line just about after the prison fight the story going on now was supposed to happen back at the prison, guess it'll be more interesting now but I can kind of feel what they are using with comic and how they are changing it its nice fan service great use of the hunters they were so scary. the main actor was great.


you reading the new comic story line? I don't know what to think of it its interesting but its pretty slow so far a few big reveals world building and such. interesting but slow.



oh yeah carol is turning into an actually good character, I didn't like her in season one or two though just not much to the character.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

09 Nov 2014, 6:52 pm

I think the show struggles with is writing female characters, Laurie Holden's acting made you dislike her but she was acting out the the way her character was written and I'm not sure if they anybody would of made the character likable. She was bossy and a know it all despite consistently doing the "wrong" thing, they had her whine and self pity too much. Almost killing the most popular character on the show at the time out of just pure stupidity and stubbornness certainly didn't endear her character to fans either Holden's tended to overact too I think, when her sister died in season 1 it was just too much. There was just way too much melodrama in general in the earlier seasons of the show, I think it's hard not to focus on Lori and Andrea who were the primary source of that. Carl was not well liked at a time either.