My favorite film is Star Trek II. I think it is because of the villain, the ending, and perhaps because of the more human way the characters are dealt with then in most of the films.
my opinion, your mileage my vary (out of ****)
Motion Picture (Director's Edition)) *** (I never saw the original version; the extended edition *1/2)
II ***1/2
III ***
IV ***
V **
VI ***
Generations ***
First Contact ***1/2
Insurrection *1/2
Nemesis **1/2
wildthing121675 wrote:
Star Trek V was rushed, cause it was a victim of the 1988-89 Writer's Strike. Also, Star Trek V had to use a different special-effects house than Industrial Light and Magic which they normally use for Star Trek films.
Oh yeah, the special effects in Star Trek V were awful. The one thing in that movie that kept in from sinking to the depths was the characterizations provided by the "big three" (Shatner, Nimoy, Kelley). It makes the film much more watchable, although there are moments when it is just awful (especially when the film switches from god-awful humor trying to make serious points in a laughable manner).
wildthing121675 wrote:
I myself call Star Trek I, The Motionless Picture. It was in the words of Homer Simpson, BO-RING.
I do like the Director's Edition though. They eliminated allot of the unneeded stuff. I really wish they handed added the "bonus footage" to Star Trek II's special addition though. In every case (perhaps except one) the new scene wasn't in the original film for obvious reasons.