Giftorcurse wrote:
Star Trek- Did it save the Trek franchise? No. It just dumbed it down... a lot.
Fully concur with this statement if what you are referring to are
Star Trek (2009) and
Star Trek: Into Darkness. I have observed that many people who are not "trekkers" seem to enjoy them much more than people I know who are avid watchers of the francise. I believe there where so many "open-ended" aspects of the Prime Universe ten movies, and even
The Original Series,
The Next Generation,
Deep Space Nine,
Voyager, and
Enterprise (albeit
Enterprise was not as quite as good as the rest, mostly due to the continuity problems).
If you meant
Star Trek: The Motion Picture from the 1970s, it lead to many great films in the francise, especially
Star Trek II: The Wrath Of Khan,
Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home, and
Star Trek VIII: First Contact.
Aside from the
Star Trek francise (or should I say francises),
Frozen: I personally do not see anything appealing in this, and cannot understand why so many people my age love it so much.
Oh, and also, I have read members posting
The Matrix, and again, disagree with that opinion.
The Matrix was a brilliant movie, and I do not understand people finding it so confusing, as I found it rather simple when thinking about it.
But, after all, these are just my opinions.
_________________
What is this signature you speak of?