Okay, I won't bother to go into detail - took to long last time, and bloody optus!
Any case, roughly, it is mathematically impossible to examine a religion in 100% detail, abstract and literal, and not reach the conclusion religion is bollocks without error or bias on your part - much as a sum cannot have a wrong answer except by misinterpretation or mistake by whoever is attempting the sum.
I don't really care to elaborate again, it's too much of a pain in the ass.
But, ultimately, though I appreciate them not blindly following, it is almost worse, because the result is the same, but if true scientific process was applied, that result cannot be anything but different. It smacks of desires and mediocracy.
_________________
Oh, well, fancy that! Isn't that neat, eh?