Page 13 of 16 [ 243 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next

Jamesy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,455
Location: Near London United Kingdom

16 Sep 2010, 6:08 pm

The Dark Knight an unintentionally sick spectacle, pretending to justify law and justice, but in reality celebrating violence and chaos.” A commenter on the website rottentomatoes.com said it way better than I ever could, so I’ll just quote him:

I kept getting exhausted and repulsed by how The Dark Knight continually had its cake and ate it too, by how it shoved oppressively bleak moments in our faces, then turned away from them later on: Gary Oldman gets shot, and we have to deal with his wife breaking down and screaming at the policeman who inform her of his death; but a half-hour later: no, he’s not really dead! We have to watch minute after minute of prisoners and civilians on two different barges decide whether or not to detonate explosives rigged to the others’ boat, and linger over their “screw everyone else, I’m totally in it for myself” rottenness (and *no one* on either boat stands up and says, “stop these madmen!” — but oh yeah, then the prisoner decides to throw the detonator out the boat window, and the civilian decides he doesn’t have the heart to go through with it — so you see, folks, the moviemakers finally demonstrated to us that these people REALLY aren’t rotten after all, even though they’ve just forced us to deal with five straight minutes of odious human nature. And then we have to endure another five solid minutes of Aaron Eckhart’s character’s holding a gun to a child’s head, to possibly avenge his girlfriend’s death, while Batman stands by and does nothing except to try to talk him out of it. So many scenes seemed intentionally designed to make us all feel powerless against society’s innate evil, and linger over and shove the rottenness of humanity down the audience’s throats. The constant foisting of fear and oppression and helplessness, going hand in hand with vigilante justice (and even an indirect justification of the Patriot Act, with Bruce Wayne’s radio-monitoring device) made me wonder if Dick Cheney had co-written the screenplay. My wife and I left the theater both wondering out loud, is THIS the movie that our country really needs to be tuning into right now? But of course, we’re only two small voices amongst the movie’s $150 million opening weekend, and after all (as so many fanboys are quick to point out), “it’s only a movie.”



LexingtonDeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,364
Location: Blackburn

16 Sep 2010, 6:13 pm

Jamesy wrote:
The Dark Knight an unintentionally sick spectacle, pretending to justify law and justice, but in reality celebrating violence and chaos.” A commenter on the website rottentomatoes.com said it way better than I ever could, so I’ll just quote him:

I kept getting exhausted and repulsed by how The Dark Knight continually had its cake and ate it too, by how it shoved oppressively bleak moments in our faces, then turned away from them later on: Gary Oldman gets shot, and we have to deal with his wife breaking down and screaming at the policeman who inform her of his death; but a half-hour later: no, he’s not really dead! We have to watch minute after minute of prisoners and civilians on two different barges decide whether or not to detonate explosives rigged to the others’ boat, and linger over their “screw everyone else, I’m totally in it for myself” rottenness (and *no one* on either boat stands up and says, “stop these madmen!” — but oh yeah, then the prisoner decides to throw the detonator out the boat window, and the civilian decides he doesn’t have the heart to go through with it — so you see, folks, the moviemakers finally demonstrated to us that these people REALLY aren’t rotten after all, even though they’ve just forced us to deal with five straight minutes of odious human nature. And then we have to endure another five solid minutes of Aaron Eckhart’s character’s holding a gun to a child’s head, to possibly avenge his girlfriend’s death, while Batman stands by and does nothing except to try to talk him out of it. So many scenes seemed intentionally designed to make us all feel powerless against society’s innate evil, and linger over and shove the rottenness of humanity down the audience’s throats. The constant foisting of fear and oppression and helplessness, going hand in hand with vigilante justice (and even an indirect justification of the Patriot Act, with Bruce Wayne’s radio-monitoring device) made me wonder if Dick Cheney had co-written the screenplay. My wife and I left the theater both wondering out loud, is THIS the movie that our country really needs to be tuning into right now? But of course, we’re only two small voices amongst the movie’s $150 million opening weekend, and after all (as so many fanboys are quick to point out), “it’s only a movie.”


Sorry, but you and that critic are in the minority. Stop changing the subject.


_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty


Jamesy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,455
Location: Near London United Kingdom

16 Sep 2010, 6:41 pm

No not really just a bunch of deluded fan boys out there hype up the dark knight.



imbatshitcrazy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,492

16 Sep 2010, 8:23 pm

Jamesy wrote:
No not really just a bunch of deluded fan boys out there hype up the dark knight.

jamesy, no one here is deluded but you. you are part of a minority, live with it. just because you like something doesn't mean it is absolute fact. there are such things as opinions. the dark knight has a great box office success and a huge fan base because it made batman serious, unlike schumacher who raped and killed the batman franchise for 8 years. you just like batman forever because you probably saw it as a child and you are biased against the others. you are also ignorant of the comic books. you have no idea about batman as a character, which is why we are pissed off at you. it would be like me talking about economics and me saying "my opinion is fact, everyone else is stupid." seriously, just shut the f**k up



Jamesy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,455
Location: Near London United Kingdom

16 Sep 2010, 8:50 pm

Yeah but I like I said the Dark Knight was hyped up WAY too much. I saw Batman Returns tonight and I loved it was a great film. Sorry but TDK was just dull and it was far too hyped up and overrated when it came out in 2008, I was bitterly dissapointed when I first saw TDK. God even the videos on youtube made it seem more exciting than it was.

Begins was realeased with mixed reviews and was only given 3 stars in culture magazine becasue the SOUL searching aspect ruined it and it was ages untill we saw any action in the film.

I think many a bat comic or film fan would agree that batman returns is a pure classic unlike TDK.

And yeah yeah blah blah batman is suppoused to be "realistic" and this the 21st century yada yada but unfourntalty Nolan takes his films far too seriously and gets "realistic" mixed up with "boring". Overall it makes for a rather dull filming experience. I am not talking from a 'comic book' perspective but from a film fan perspective.



LexingtonDeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,364
Location: Blackburn

17 Sep 2010, 1:21 am

Jamesy wrote:
Yeah but I like I said the Dark Knight was hyped up WAY too much. I saw Batman Returns tonight and I loved it was a great film. Sorry but TDK was just dull and it was far too hyped up and overrated when it came out in 2008, I was bitterly dissapointed when I first saw TDK. God even the videos on youtube made it seem more exciting than it was.

Begins was realeased with mixed reviews and was only given 3 stars in culture magazine becasue the SOUL searching aspect ruined it and it was ages untill we saw any action in the film.

I think many a bat comic or film fan would agree that batman returns is a pure classic unlike TDK.

And yeah yeah blah blah batman is suppoused to be "realistic" and this the 21st century yada yada but unfourntalty Nolan takes his films far too seriously and gets "realistic" mixed up with "boring". Overall it makes for a rather dull filming experience. I am not talking from a 'comic book' perspective but from a film fan perspective.


Batman Returns was the LAST DECENT film before Warner Bros decided to go all kiddie-orientated, but it focused too much on the villians rather than Batman himself. It felt like Danny DeVito and Michelle Pfeiffer were stealing the show (Which they were), and i watch it from time to time. Sadly, Aliens was on C4 and seeing as that's my fave movie of all time which i can watch without getting bored, it was a no-brainer.

Begins got more positive than mixed reviews, Total Film and Empire gave it 5 and 4 stars respectively.

Most fans i know told me they like Begins and TDK, so your effectively still in the minority and repeating yourself like a ret*d parrot.


_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty


imbatshitcrazy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,492

17 Sep 2010, 6:30 am

Jamesy wrote:
Yeah but I like I said the Dark Knight was hyped up WAY too much. I saw Batman Returns tonight and I loved it was a great film. Sorry but TDK was just dull and it was far too hyped up and overrated when it came out in 2008, I was bitterly dissapointed when I first saw TDK. God even the videos on youtube made it seem more exciting than it was.

Begins was realeased with mixed reviews and was only given 3 stars in culture magazine becasue the SOUL searching aspect ruined it and it was ages untill we saw any action in the film.

I think many a bat comic or film fan would agree that batman returns is a pure classic unlike TDK.

And yeah yeah blah blah batman is suppoused to be "realistic" and this the 21st century yada yada but unfourntalty Nolan takes his films far too seriously and gets "realistic" mixed up with "boring". Overall it makes for a rather dull filming experience. I am not talking from a 'comic book' perspective but from a film fan perspective.

god, do you even know what an opinion is jamesy?



Jamesy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,455
Location: Near London United Kingdom

17 Sep 2010, 9:13 am

Maybe thats whay begins and TDK are so boring becasue it focuses too much on batman and takes itself too seriously.



imbatshitcrazy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,492

17 Sep 2010, 10:25 am

Jamesy wrote:
Maybe thats whay begins and TDK are so boring becasue it focuses too much on batman and takes itself too seriously.

shut up troll



LexingtonDeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,364
Location: Blackburn

17 Sep 2010, 10:42 am

Jamesy wrote:
Maybe thats whay begins and TDK are so boring becasue it focuses too much on batman and takes itself too seriously.


Im still disagreeing here, look at Tim Burton's movies. As much as i love them and rewatch them from time to time, much of 89 focused on Jack Nicholson hamming it up as a mobster in clown make-up. Returns had the same with Danny DeVito's baroque and grotesque Penguin snatching all the best dialogue.

You could also say Forever focused way too much on Jim Carrey clowning about as the Riddler, and made Tommy Lee Jones feel like a really bad side-kick as Two Face.

I think it's good to focus more on Batman's origins rather than have costumed supervillians taking up massive amounts of screentime. Nolan said he wanted to avoid the "Wurzel Gummidge look" for the Scarecrow, the burlap-sack mask with the built in gas dispenser is far more intimidating than a real scarecrow outfit.

For the 3rd movie in 2012, id like to see Batman try and redeem himself in Gotham's eyes. Redemption has to be the sole theme.


_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty


Jamesy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,455
Location: Near London United Kingdom

17 Sep 2010, 10:48 am

I think the third batman needs to ligthen up a little bit. Fine we have seen the dark realistic and gritty side of batman in TDK and Begins is it too much to ask for Batman 3 to be slightly more surreal and have a more interesting looking goththam city? Gotham city looked distinctly different in TDK compared to how it looked in Begins. Part of what ruined TDK was the look of gothan city i preffered the gothan in Batman Begins.



LexingtonDeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,364
Location: Blackburn

17 Sep 2010, 10:53 am

Jamesy wrote:
I think the third batman needs to ligthen up a little bit. Fine we have seen the dark realistic and gritty side of batman in TDK and Begins is it too much to ask for Batman 3 to be slightly more surreal and have a more interesting looking goththam city? Gotham city looked distinctly different in TDK compared to how it looked in Begins. Part of what ruined TDK was the look of gothan city i preffered the gothan in Batman Begins.


Telling Batman to lighten up is a bit like telling Captain America to emigrate, or telling Superman to cut down on all that flying lark. Fat chance of that ever happening, The reason why TDK's Gotham looked different was because it ventured into the main centre of the city, Begins was mainly focused on the Narrows.

Besides, id like to see a Batman film based on the Arkham Asylum game. It has a mixture of dark fantasy while remaining faithful to the comics.


_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty


Jamesy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,455
Location: Near London United Kingdom

17 Sep 2010, 11:01 am

But batman is about a guy who dresses as a bat? Why does that need to be so bloody serious and dull?

I am not talking about a film that is faithful to the comics but about a movie that is enterataining.



LexingtonDeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,364
Location: Blackburn

17 Sep 2010, 11:08 am

Jamesy wrote:
But batman is about a guy who dresses as a bat? Why does that need to be so bloody serious and dull?

I am not talking about a film that is faithful to the comics but about a movie that is enterataining.


A bat isn't exactly a creature you associate with happy thoughts, it's a symbol of the night due to it's forboding nature. Be honest, Batman would look completely out of place during broad daylight, look at the 60's TV series. Half of every fecking episode was done in the day!


_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty


Jamesy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,455
Location: Near London United Kingdom

17 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm

Yep and your forgetting how a lot of the dark knight was shot in the day. Past bat films always had batman come out at night.

A film that has a guy dress as a bat does not really need to be realistic and why do we need batman to represent realism?



LexingtonDeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,364
Location: Blackburn

17 Sep 2010, 12:37 pm

Jamesy wrote:
Yep and your forgetting how a lot of the dark knight was shot in the day. Past bat films always had batman come out at night.

A film that has a guy dress as a bat does not really need to be realistic and why do we need batman to represent realism?



Jamesy, you are so dense sometimes. Nearly ALL of Batman's scenes in Begins AND TDK took place at night (Narrows finale, Tumbler chase, multi-storey car park scene etc). Besides, Batman would stick out like a sore thumb at daytime.

Regarding realism, Batman is has been given said reboot because he can't walk through walls or summon the weather, he's basically a creature of the night who's heroics verge close to vigilantism.


_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty