What do other Aspies think of 2001: A Space Odyssey?

Page 3 of 4 [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

ZEGH8578
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,532

27 Jul 2009, 5:50 am

Wombat wrote:

The plot builds up so that you are expecting greatness and fantastic revelations but then it all turns to crap and is depressing. What the hell is wrong with that man?


i kindov do that w my own sci-fi, to piss readers off, but i havent seen or read 2001, so im not sure what exactly your refering to :D


_________________
''In the world I see - you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center.''


oppositedirection
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 515

27 Jul 2009, 11:58 am

Wombat wrote:
The plot builds up so that you are expecting greatness and fantastic revelations but then it all turns to crap and is depressing. What the hell is wrong with that man?
To really push a theme, Kubrick satirises science. Humanity is faced with all the mysteries of the universe, science was meant to provide us with great and fantastic revelations and guess what, 2001 building up and then delivering no answers is precisely how Kubrick felt about science.



AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 72,088
Location: Portland, Oregon

27 Jul 2009, 12:54 pm

Boring as hell!

The images were great, yet no plot.

No one talked for about 3/4 for the movie.


_________________
Silly NTs, I have Aspergers, and having Aspergers is gr-r-reat!


kissmyarrrtichoke
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 288
Location: Oxford

27 Jul 2009, 5:30 pm

It confused me at first, but my dad explained it and it makes more sense. It terrified me more than any other movie due to the lack of music making you feel really in isolation light years away from help and I had nightmares about space for ages. Though I still get scared now, I appreciate that it is a cinematic masterpiece and an epic movie, apart from the start before the apes get interesting. And I can't really watch the LSD trip thing at the end any more due to increased photosensitivity :(


_________________
Spare a talent for an old ex-leper?
Monty Python's Life of Brian


Skilpadde
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,019

28 Jul 2009, 10:22 pm

Bataar wrote:
Prof_Pretorius wrote:
You obviously have never read any material behind the movie, and sound like you've only seen it once.
No, I haven't read anything behind it. IMO, a good movie should be able to stand on its own.


I concur.



Last edited by Skilpadde on 28 Jul 2009, 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Skilpadde
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,019

28 Jul 2009, 10:22 pm

I've only seen this movie once but that was more than enough. Confusing, long, slow, boring and incoherent. I have seldom been so disappointed by a sci-fi flick.



collectoritis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,050

29 Jul 2009, 8:53 pm

I got a religious feel from this movie somehow.....this was much , much more than just another movie :D

Also why is it so bad that it makes you think instead of it having "chewed the food" so audience don't have to ponder....kudos to it for making you think about what's under the surface , there's more in this than what meets the eye.



CactusKid
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 17 May 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 63

31 Jul 2009, 6:20 am

I watched the film when I was eight. 8O 8O 8O 8O 8O 8O 8O 8O 8O 8O 8O 8O It's definitely in my top 3.



Greensmith
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 17 May 2009
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 57

02 Aug 2009, 7:31 pm

I have a lot of respect for 2001. I think- from a technical standpoint- it's one of the best films I've ever seen. This is due to the atmosphere, the way it slowly tightens its grip on the audience, and the ideas that are presented, even if they're ambiguous. It's definitely not on my top ten list of favourites, because it's not one of those films you can throw on when you need a little entertainment. It's more of an artistic experience that swallows you whole, if you let it. The story's not there, the emotion's not there, the ending's baffling, and that's all deliberate. I don't think I understand it and I don't think I ever will. But I do think it's brilliant.



sErgEantaEgis
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 233
Location: Canada

25 Jan 2012, 8:17 am

I actually really enjoy that movie, it was way ahead of it's time. I get a lot of people complaining ''Hurr durr how come in 2001 they get moonbases and can send people to Jupiter?'' Well actually back in the sixties it was plausible to Clarke that science would progress that fast in 40 years or so. The problem was more due to human elements (not wanting to invest in science, etc...). If you didn't know, it's quite hard to predict the future, but at least the movie protray very realistic science unseen in other sci-fi movies during the days.



Venger
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,519

25 Jan 2012, 4:51 pm

sErgEantaEgis wrote:
I actually really enjoy that movie,


Obviously since you bumped this two and a half year old thread.



proxybear
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 163

26 Jan 2012, 7:14 am

I really enjoyed the movie.

It was nice and relaxing. Like I could let every little thing that was bothering me behind me and just sit back and enjoy the movie slowly progressing.

Though I enjoy his work "A Clockwork Orange" a lot more.



fraac
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,865

26 Jan 2012, 8:10 am

Boring. I don't like films that make me do the work. Want to sit back and be entertained.



Mummy_of_Peanut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,564
Location: Bonnie Scotland

26 Jan 2012, 8:19 am

Yet another - BORING


_________________
"We act as though comfort and luxury were the chief requirements of life, when all we need to make us really happy is something to be enthusiatic about." Charles Kingsley


impulse94
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2011
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 84

26 Jan 2012, 9:18 am

"Boring" for some is "hypnotic" for others. I for one love getting lost in the slower scenes, and revel at the dance of the shuttle and the space wheel, among other things.



Doomeo
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2012
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 23

03 Feb 2012, 5:27 pm

Greensmith wrote:
I have a lot of respect for 2001. I think- from a technical standpoint- it's one of the best films I've ever seen. This is due to the atmosphere, the way it slowly tightens its grip on the audience, and the ideas that are presented, even if they're ambiguous. It's definitely not on my top ten list of favourites, because it's not one of those films you can throw on when you need a little entertainment. It's more of an artistic experience that swallows you whole, if you let it. The story's not there, the emotion's not there, the ending's baffling, and that's all deliberate. I don't think I understand it and I don't think I ever will. But I do think it's brilliant.


I really do agree with you! It isn't just a movie where you just have to just fallow the plot. I don't really think that it is the whole point of the movie. The point of the movie is just to make you feel like you are on a little space ship or something like that. It also takes you on a little trip.