Prof_Pretorius wrote:
How about a "C" rating ??
"This movie contains scenes which are cliche ridden. Some are so old and recycled so as to be painful to watch for some sensitive viewers."
This would apply to most films. Perhaps an "O" rating ("This film contains some original plot/character development") would be a more practical alternative? Most of Hollywood's recent catalogue wouldn't earn it.
Jacoby wrote:
CGI, I can't stand it. Totally lazy way to make a movie, doesn't look real at all to me and takes me out of it. It seems like a lot of movies nowadays go for these crazy CGI visuals at expense of story.
CGI can be a brilliant way to embellish details, reduce costs (crowd multiplication, for instance) and minimise risks for the actors. When used to gild existing work, it can be brilliant. It's when entire effects are CGI (Godzilla, for instance) that it comes across looking fake, and that gets used so much now...