GoonSquad wrote:
Klowglas wrote:
Is the show still centering around human-human conflicts? I stopped watching during the Woodboring saga, now I'm hearing stuff about cannibals and I'm just frowning, I hate it when zombies become an after-thought. I suspect I was right in dropping the show.
So, you think it would be better if they just constantly killed zombies?
Zombies are kinda one trick ponies; how do you keep them interesting over 5 seasons?
The show is really about survival ethics. Zombies are just a plot device.
Zombies project that feeling of impending doom. Humans/human conflict don't really project that sort of feeling. It's like in the movies, when they are stuck in the barn/house and the hordes of zombies are waiting outside. That is the zombie experience that they should be focusing on, humans don't project that feeling at all. and plus, there are so many shows on television that focus on human/human conflicts, it rally losses what makes it unique when they decide to focus on them.
It would still remain interesting over several seasons too because it is survival after all, and there's so many ways you can pull the rabbit out of that hat...in the first season it was survival in that high-rise, then it was survival in the campsite, then it was survival on the freeway, then in the farn-house...they were perpetually running from the zombies (not humans) for their dear lives.
and that's not to say that there shouldn't be no human/human conflicts, but that it shouldn't be the focus point. The zombies need to be the greatest and most terrifying force in the series, when they make the humans more formidable, the feeling of impending doom and "all is lost, we're only holding on for as long as we can" completely goes away.
In Woodbury, it seemed clear to me that the creators/writers were focusing on an opposite philosophy. It stopped being a show about zombies after that, and it seems like it remained that way, shame as I really used to enjoy the series.