Django Unchained (2012) / IMDb / Cinema / The Weinstein Company and Columbia Pictures
Cinema poster:
Plot:
Quote:
Former dentist, Dr. King Schultz, buys the freedom of a slave, Django, and trains him with the intent to make him his deputy bounty hunter. Instead, he is led to the site of Django's wife who is under the hands of Calvin Candie, a ruthless plantation owner.
Comments:
I've been wanting to see this film ever since it was first mooted as a project. And, well, what can I say? It mostly lived up to my expectations. It was savagely violent (which I liked), it had gratuitous nods to classic spaghetti westerns (which I also liked) and, yes, it also had a nod to Franco Nero in it (which I also liked). I got the impression that not many people had seen the 1966
Django or the other Spaghetti Westerns to which they referred. I wasn't actually particularly big on Jamie Foxx's portrayal of Django - I mean, I felt sympathy with him and his plight, certainly, but I didn't have much time for him as a character. Of the characters, the most compelling two were Dr. Schultz (played by Christoph Waltz) and "house n****r" Steven (played by Samuel L. Jackson). Jackson's character in particular was the most intriguing out of all of them, I think. I did feel that the film was too long and needed a better editor - the film had a tendency to repeat itself (fainting was used as a gag twice, I think) and sort of lose focus. Remember, the idea of the film was that Django became a bounty hunter and that plot strand more or less got lost for me about halfway into the film. Yes, there were some references to it thereafter but I think they got it badly wrong. The film should have probably been about 30 minutes shorter (or a better plot utilised to justify the extra running time). Leonardo DiCaprio's Candie was said to be quite charming in the blurb that I had read, but frankly I just found him irritating and wanted him to die immediately, whereas I could have watched Waltz's portrayal of the eccentric Schultz all day. Perhaps it's just me.
So, in short - above average, but could have been better, certainly.
Last edited by Tequila on 23 Jan 2013, 8:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.