Page 4 of 4 [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

12 Jun 2012, 8:38 am

Quatermass wrote:
NeueZiel wrote:
David and Shaw were bar none the best characters in the movie.


I wasn't really that impressed with any of the characters. None of them stood out too much. The one that stands out the most is David but the rest of them were kind of flat.



Apple_in_my_Eye
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: in my brain

13 Jun 2012, 5:32 pm

I saw it yesterday and while I'm glad I saw it (and will probably see it again (in 3D this time)) it was a bit disappointing in some ways. I think it would've been better if the story had been written by Kubrick and filmed by Scott (he does an amazing job with the visuals). Or, co-written and co-filmed by both.

The character development did seem lacking. I was surprised to see the captain suddenly become so heroic, since his other scenes involved him saying, "yeah, whatever, I'll do that later after I've had breakfast" and decorating a Christmas tree.

Also, I have the impression that the writer and Scott are not overly scientifically literate. The scene in the beginning leading to... well, here's a link --> BEWARE, SPOILERS HERE



Chevand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jul 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 580
Location: Vancouver, BC

17 Jun 2012, 4:45 am

I just saw it today. Honestly, I don't understand the vitriol with which the movie seems to have been received. I thought it was a gorgeous, thought-provoking film.

I've read a lot of negative reviews that say the movie leaves too many questions unanswered (although, personally, I thought it did a good job of answering a few big ones that have been circulating since the first movie in 1979). The real irony is, I've also read plenty of the same negative reviews complaining that Ridley Scott is threatening to take all the mystique out of the franchise by exploring the origins of the xenomorphs in the first place. My answer is this: It's pretty obvious Scott has set up the plotline for a sequel. Until then, just take the movie for what it is, and enjoy coming up with your own explanations for the questions it left open. Isn't that kind of what made the franchise so intriguing to begin with?

If you have yet to see the movie and plan on doing so, my advice would be, check all your expectations at the door. Don't go into the movie wanting Alien, Episode Zero. There are definitely nods to Alien and its sequels-- the most pivotal of which is the "space jockey" from the original film. But Prometheus is very much its own movie in more ways than it isn't.

I keep hearing that the character development and dialogue were weak. I agree, they aren't on par with Scott's first film or Cameron's sequel. And perhaps audiences these days are a bit jaded, because a lot of us (like myself) have seen those two films over and over and over, and we're intimately familiar with the formula already. Crew goes into space, makes a discovery, tempts forces beyond their comprehension, and as a result, all hell breaks loose. And meanwhile, the company has someone within the group covertly carrying out its agenda. Yeah, alright. It's cliché. But I don't exactly understand why people are faulting Prometheus for that, when the whole Alien franchise has pretty much repeated that formula. At least Prometheus introduced some brand new elements into the mix with the Engineers.

As far as acting, I don't have much else to add to what has been said already. I thought Rapace and Theron both handled their roles respectably, and Fassbender's portrayal of the synthetic David was easily of the same quality as Ian Holm's Ash and Lance Henriksen's Bishop. Visually, the movie was impressive (particularly in IMAX 3D), and I was really ecstatic to see some new H.R. Giger designs.

If/when Ridley Scott comes up with another installment, I'm sure it will delve deeper into explaining the way that this movie connects to the events of the Alien series. In addition to finishing the sentence that Prometheus began, I personally hope it will show much more of the development of the Weyland-Yutani Corporation, since that does seem to be the real thing that drives the storyline of the entire arc.


_________________
Mediocrity is a petty vice; aspiring to it is a grievous sin.


XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

17 Jun 2012, 12:45 pm

It was worth going to see, but the characters and the "advanced aliens" did a bunch of really stupid things that kept throwing me out of the story.

Overall grade: B-

David was the best character.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


Adam82
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 615

20 Jun 2012, 4:20 am

I loved it. I've seen it twice, and may go again.

Can't wait for the Blu ray to put next to my Alien boxset :)



BigJohnnyCool
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 330

25 Jun 2012, 6:30 pm

Didn't go to see the movie, I'm waiting for its sequel...

Prometheus and Bob



Apple_in_my_Eye
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: in my brain

25 Jun 2012, 6:49 pm

BigJohnnyCool wrote:
Didn't go to see the movie, I'm waiting for its sequel...

Prometheus and Bob

and the sequel's sequel will be named,

"Prometheus and Bob's Big Adventure"



ilkhanid
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jun 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 35

18 Jun 2013, 6:46 am

pete1061 wrote:
Also from an effects standpoint, it was great, but as with any prequel of a sci-fi movies from years ago, everything is a lot higher-tech appearing than the original. The Prometheus has fancy holographic displays, while the Nostromo had Apple II quality displays. But now I'm just nit-picking.


That could be explained by the fact that the 'Prometheus' is a state-of-the-at vessel,while the 'Nostromo' is an old work-horse,possibly with hand-me-down equipment.

This occurs to me:if the aliens,the "Engineers" are soooooo old,if we are to believe that that they are the ones who seeded life on Earth,then it seems that their level of technological advancement is not commensurate with their age. They travel on ships with holograms,push-button controls,wear space suits,are capable of being overwhelmed by their creations.....By contrast,the Black Monoloth beings of 2001 (who would be younger than the Engineers, are almost Gods by comparison.