While I never cared much for mr. hanky anyway, there is a point to the question of where these shows are going. And art in general.
The Apu character is a stereotype, of course. All characters are. They are not real, so it's always possible to critize a fictional character of misrepresenting reality.
Also: yes, India is in bad shape today... A more real stereotype of an Indian could be a anti-muslim hindu-nationalist who thinks that it's okay to treat some people as less-than-human because god made them that way ...'better luck next life.'.... Apu is a stereotype. But reality could be so much worse. And if Apu were a tall, fair-skinned upper caste Indian with a degree from Stanford... He wouldn't be a realistic portrait either.
And that's a problem with fiction: any decision by a creator is always an exclusion of all other things, because reality is complex.
Someone's going to be offended, always.
Fiction might be too ... Political, just by it's nature, and because it can't defend itself like facts can - but then, we're argueing about those as well....
_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.