So I watched the movie and and I do agree that it does have depth and heart, but as far as the dirty dancing scenes go, how was the director suppose to show the audience what the dancing was without actually showing the dancing? The director could have kept the cameras on their faces the entire time but then we would have no idea what they were doing and we would just become confused wouldn't we? So was showing it necessary therefore?
Also, another thing about the movie is that when you read what all the people who are trashing the movie online have to say, the scene that is complained most about is a scene where a breast is shown, some have said. Others have called it a 'topless scene', thereby implying topless, meaning two breasts are shown. I have these comments before watching the movie, so I was on the lookout for this scene. Not that I want to see child nudity at all in a movie, and I was hoping there wasn't going to be any. And I'm glad to say this scene didn't happen in the movie. I watched the whole thing, so that means 3 things. I watched the whole thing, so that means 3 things.
1. Either I somehow missed the scene when I was watching it.
2. The people who said there is a topless scene lied in order to trash the movie more and stir the pot more.
3. Netflix has edited the footage out since they first aired the movie.
But this is my preliminary assessment of the movie as I just watched it and it has to sink in more. What do you think? Is there a way to make a movie about showing 11 year olds be subjected to dirty dancing, without having to show how dirty the dancing is, for viewer to get the point?
27 Oct 2020, 7:06 am
