I don't watch it. It's reviews are horribly biased. Red Orchestra: Ostfront 41-45 was given a bad rating just because it was a realistic FPS, whereas BF2 was given a good rating just because it was a semi-realistic FPS.
I also saw the review for Vietcong, and although it was given a 3/5 rating, one of the cons they pointed out was that sometimes you couldn't see who shot you.
WTF? It's a game set in Vietnam, so obviously cover and concealment is a highlight of the game. You can't expect to run in the opens and clearly spot a sniper hiding in the bushes before you receive a bullet to the head.
Reviews aren't always reliable since the games being reviewed aren't given much time for playing. But reviews shouldn't be biased.
It's fine if a deathmatch oriented game is given a good rating, but if that same reviewer wants to review a more realistic game, then the reviewer shouldn't expect it to be like a deathmatch oriented game and give it a bad rating for being slower paced.
PS: A little secret: I might watch X-Play just to see Morgan