tb86 wrote:
Just saw Captain America the Winter Soldier and I gotta say it was pretty good. Probably one of the best in the MCU, though not number one though I have heard a lot of reviewers say it's the best one of the MCU even getting a higher percentage than the Avengers on Rotten tomatoes but that may change in a few days.
So, no all too obvious Disney touches, as you were fearing a while ago?
My personal favourite superhero movies in the Marvel Movieverse is the Iron Man trilogy as a whole (though maybe they're gonna make a 4th one. I dunno). I like Downey's Tony Stark best when he's directed by Favreau/Black, and not Whedon. I personally thought that Iron Man was the best comic-to-movie translation among the Marvel Studios films. It helps that, of all the Marvel superheroes who have starred in their solo films in the MCU so far, Tony Stark is probably the character most likely to occur in real life- the other three, (Cap, Thor, Hulk) each have something that makes them a bit more 'otherworldly' than Tony. Even though Stark is a genius billionaire (and most of us are neither), his adventures in the movies are actually quite plausible, and the almost ad-libbed dialogue make it a quirky counterweight to the excellent Dark Knight Trilogy, which was likewise trying to push the man behind the mask more center stage.
I have a split opinion when it comes to Avengers. The comic book fan in me loves it. Even if you don't watch any of the MCU films that came out prior to Avengers, but you're still an Avengers reader, you're probably gonna think it's cool (though YMMV). The costumes, the situations, the technology, the way the world works, S.H.I.E.L.D.'s role in it, are all to some degree lifted straight from the comic books. It's a 'feast of recognition' as we say in the Netherlands.
But the movie fan in me is a bit more critical. I understand that it functions as a part in a larger series of superhero movies. But I like my movies to have a start, a middle, and an ending. I don't want to be dependent on other films or other media full stop, to enjoy a single 2 hour movie. In my opinion, an ideal movie about Marvel's Avengers would require zero prior knowledge of either the comics or the other movies, and could stand on its own well enough. The solo films in the MCU can do this, even if there is a lot of tying in going on. Avengers, however, can't, because it doesn't really bother to properly introduce the team members, or put them up against a threat that's worthy of their stature. Loki is a bit underwhelming in it, and the Chitauri are faceless. The defeat of both of them is rushed, in spite of a 30 minute action scene. Avengers is executed brilliantly, great script, great acting, great special effects- but it falls short in my opinion, by reducing itself to simply a chapter in a series. For all its pomp, it can't stand on its own like for example Batman (1989), Blade, or the first X-Men film.
_________________
clarity of thought before rashness of action