Board index › Topical Discussion › Television, Film, and Video

10 Potentially Great Movies That Got Lost In Development

Page 1 of 1 [ 12 posts ] 

Previous topic | Next topic

Which of these films do you think would have been really great?
The Man Who Killed Don Quixote 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
At The Mountains Of Madness 33%  33%  [ 2 ]
Slaughterhouse 5 17%  17%  [ 1 ]
Crusade 17%  17%  [ 1 ]
Gladiator 2 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Megalopolis 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Napoleon 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Night Skies 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
The Sandman 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
The Tourist 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
David Lynch's Ronnie Rocket 33%  33%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 6

AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 72,068
Location: Portland, Oregon

13 Aug 2020, 2:00 pm

Do you agree with the person who wrote this list?

https://listverse.com/2020/08/12/top-10-potentially-great-films-that-got-lost-in-development-hell/

Guillermo Del Toro has stated many times in many interviews he wants to do a remake of Slaughterhouse 5 with Charlie Kaufman writing the script, but hasn't heard anything from Charlie Kaufman.

("When someone is too busy to work with someone else?" :? )


_________________
Silly NTs, I have Aspergers, and having Aspergers is gr-r-reat!


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,435
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

13 Aug 2020, 4:28 pm

Del Toro may very well get to make At The Mountains Of Madness, after all.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Romofan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2020
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 602
Location: Carcosa, Texas

13 Aug 2020, 4:34 pm

A Paul Verhoeven-helmed "Crusade" starring Aahnold would have been a joy forever.

But we'll have to settle for "Showgirls" :mrgreen:



_________________
"We see the extent to which our pursuit of pleasure has been limited in large part by a vocabulary foisted upon us"


blooiejagwa
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 19 Dec 2017
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,793

13 Aug 2020, 5:20 pm

I would never watch Gladiator 2. Lion King 2 was bad enough. Gladiator can never be topped.

I also don't like thinking about the Crusades and hate the thought of it, though that's how my brother's obsession with history began and he thinks the whole thing was awesome from all sides and all angles. :roll: I'm also against historical fiction to begin with. Gladiator doesn't count because it's the story and the environment happens to be part of it. I mean depicting historical events.


_________________
Take defeat as an urge to greater effort.
-Napoleon Hill


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,435
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

13 Aug 2020, 6:26 pm

blooiejagwa wrote:
I would never watch Gladiator 2. Lion King 2 was bad enough. Gladiator can never be topped.

I also don't like thinking about the Crusades and hate the thought of it, though that's how my brother's obsession with history began and he thinks the whole thing was awesome from all sides and all angles. :roll: I'm also against historical fiction to begin with. Gladiator doesn't count because it's the story and the environment happens to be part of it. I mean depicting historical events.


I imagine a Gladiator sequel would last for the five minutes of Maximus' body being carried off the arena floor. :lol:


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 72,068
Location: Portland, Oregon

14 Aug 2020, 4:32 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Del Toro may very well get to make At The Mountains Of Madness, after all.


How so and if this is true, when will it go into production?

Question to all Lovecraft fans: If someone directed a biopic about the man himself (my preference would be GDT), who do you think would give a great performance as HP Lovecraft?


_________________
Silly NTs, I have Aspergers, and having Aspergers is gr-r-reat!


Wolfram87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2015
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,976
Location: Sweden

14 Aug 2020, 4:36 pm

My suspicion is that Lovecraft would translate poorly to film for much the same reason that King does; the authors prose is lost in the transition.


_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.


AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 72,068
Location: Portland, Oregon

14 Aug 2020, 4:48 pm

Wolfram87 wrote:
My suspicion is that Lovecraft would translate poorly to film for much the same reason that King does; the authors prose is lost in the transition.


IMO, if everything is put in good positions then maybe a Lovecraft adaptation may end up being good after all.


_________________
Silly NTs, I have Aspergers, and having Aspergers is gr-r-reat!


blooiejagwa
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 19 Dec 2017
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,793

14 Aug 2020, 5:25 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
blooiejagwa wrote:
I would never watch Gladiator 2. Lion King 2 was bad enough. Gladiator can never be topped.

I also don't like thinking about the Crusades and hate the thought of it, though that's how my brother's obsession with history began and he thinks the whole thing was awesome from all sides and all angles. :roll: I'm also against historical fiction to begin with. Gladiator doesn't count because it's the story and the environment happens to be part of it. I mean depicting historical events.


I imagine a Gladiator sequel would last for the five minutes of Maximus' body being carried off the arena floor. :lol:


It would probably be whatsherface Lucilla (?) And everyone 'rebuilding' or focusing on carrying on the legacy ..to some degree. The boy encountering problems. Blahblahblah.
The boy would be the main character. But it wouldn't be called Gladiator ---unless the boy had REALLY bad luck. It would be something else..
Like 'Empire Strikes Back' 'Return of the Jedi'

In the same vein as the preceding film..a one or 2 word noun ..


_________________
Take defeat as an urge to greater effort.
-Napoleon Hill


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,435
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

14 Aug 2020, 5:37 pm

AnonymousAnonymous wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Del Toro may very well get to make At The Mountains Of Madness, after all.


How so and if this is true, when will it go into production?

Question to all Lovecraft fans: If someone directed a biopic about the man himself (my preference would be GDT), who do you think would give a great performance as HP Lovecraft?


I recall reading someplace or other that Del Toro was given the green light.
Don't know who could play Lovecraft, but it would be hard making him a sympathetic character these days, as his racism is now indefensible.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,435
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

14 Aug 2020, 5:43 pm

blooiejagwa wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
blooiejagwa wrote:
I would never watch Gladiator 2. Lion King 2 was bad enough. Gladiator can never be topped.

I also don't like thinking about the Crusades and hate the thought of it, though that's how my brother's obsession with history began and he thinks the whole thing was awesome from all sides and all angles. :roll: I'm also against historical fiction to begin with. Gladiator doesn't count because it's the story and the environment happens to be part of it. I mean depicting historical events.


I imagine a Gladiator sequel would last for the five minutes of Maximus' body being carried off the arena floor. :lol:


It would probably be whatsherface Lucilla (?) And everyone 'rebuilding' or focusing on carrying on the legacy ..to some degree. The boy encountering problems. Blahblahblah.
The boy would be the main character. But it wouldn't be called Gladiator ---unless the boy had REALLY bad luck. It would be something else..
Like 'Empire Strikes Back' 'Return of the Jedi'

In the same vein as the preceding film..a one or 2 word noun ..


The idea of a restoration of the Republic in the movie was, by that date, nonexistent. Too many generations had passed since the Romans had lived in a Republic. By that time, people's only concern was that the emperor wasn't too crazy or despotic, like Commodus had been.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


blooiejagwa
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 19 Dec 2017
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,793

14 Aug 2020, 9:18 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
blooiejagwa wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
blooiejagwa wrote:
I would never watch Gladiator 2. Lion King 2 was bad enough. Gladiator can never be topped.

I also don't like thinking about the Crusades and hate the thought of it, though that's how my brother's obsession with history began and he thinks the whole thing was awesome from all sides and all angles. :roll: I'm also against historical fiction to begin with. Gladiator doesn't count because it's the story and the environment happens to be part of it. I mean depicting historical events.


I imagine a Gladiator sequel would last for the five minutes of Maximus' body being carried off the arena floor. :lol:


It would probably be whatsherface Lucilla (?) And everyone 'rebuilding' or focusing on carrying on the legacy ..to some degree. The boy encountering problems. Blahblahblah.
The boy would be the main character. But it wouldn't be called Gladiator ---unless the boy had REALLY bad luck. It would be something else..
Like 'Empire Strikes Back' 'Return of the Jedi'

In the same vein as the preceding film..a one or 2 word noun ..


The idea of a restoration of the Republic in the movie was, by that date, nonexistent. Too many generations had passed since the Romans had lived in a Republic. By that time, people's only concern was that the emperor wasn't too crazy or despotic, like Commodus had been.


i am aware. hence 'to some degree'-attempts. it can play out on a personal level however..i'm writing as though i am a producer! :roll:


_________________
Take defeat as an urge to greater effort.
-Napoleon Hill