Who else thinks the SG-1 franchise is crap?

Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ] 


Whta do you think of the SG-1 franchise
C'mon, it's entertaining and fun 64%  64%  [ 7 ]
It's uttlery crap 27%  27%  [ 3 ]
Something in-between 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
I prefer "Infinty Gauntlet" 9%  9%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 11

AleusMundiSonoftheRex
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 17
Location: Lima, Perú

30 Jul 2007, 12:36 pm

C'mon don't tell me that you've hasn't been annoyed by the premise...decive the pulbic from the wonders of the universe for its own good at hands of the USAF military (The same guys that put people or better say corpsicles into Irak... :evil:) only for an smalll elite of privligied ones to enjoy its secrets, and mostly nerdy scientists or impossibly noble-and-good militars, when you've seen a noble-and-good militar since Abu Ghraib? Since Vietnam and the Napalm bombardments? Since the Granada invasion? Since Bahía de Cochinos? Since the Iran takeover of the '50? Since Bush Jr. leaves Darfur to its own luck? Are they the people we want going to the stars or it's just that the Asgard are as delusional as us?


_________________
Some loser sub-deity attached me to this mudball to die in it. I'm already plotting revenge.


alexbeetle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,314
Location: beetle hole

30 Jul 2007, 2:04 pm

I liked the characters in the original SG-1 but hate Atlantis and watch none of it now.


_________________
Any implied social connection is an artifact of the distance between my computer and yours.

It might look like I'm doing nothing, but at the cellular level I'm really quite busy.


-Vorzac-
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 26 May 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 439

30 Jul 2007, 2:56 pm

big load of crap



edal
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 739
Location: Gyor, Hungary

31 Jul 2007, 10:09 am

Big SG-1 fan, and Stargate Atlantis. They do lose something though when dubbed into Hungarian.

Ed Almos



ping-machine
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 854

01 Aug 2007, 2:59 am

Didn't like it at first, because I saw the movie and don't like when different actors are suddenly playing the same characters -- and how the hell did Daniel Jackson end up back at SG-1 when he was supposed to have stayed behind?! Lately I still prefer the movie. I'm not massively into the series but I do like watching the occasional episode.


_________________
"We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune."


Flagg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,399
Location: Western US

01 Aug 2007, 4:38 am

AleusMundiSonoftheRex wrote:
C'mon don't tell me that you've hasn't been annoyed by the premise...decive the pulbic from the wonders of the universe for its own good at hands of the USAF military (The same guys that put people or better say corpsicles into Iraq... :evil:) only for an smalll elite of privligied ones to enjoy its secrets, and mostly nerdy scientists or impossibly noble-and-good militars, when you've seen a noble-and-good militar since Abu Ghraib? Since Vietnam and the Napalm bombardments? Since the Granada invasion? Since Bahía de Cochinos? Since the Iran takeover of the '50? Since Bush Jr. leaves Darfur to its own luck? Are they the people we want going to the stars or it's just that the Asgard are as delusional as us?


Point 1: The United States Armed Forces is infamous for it's skill at hiding things from the public - every time a new document is declassfied it's something you had no idea they were thinking about trying when they were testing it for over three decades.

Quote:
or impossibly noble-and-good militars, when you've seen a noble-and-good militar since Abu Ghraib? Since Vietnam and the Napalm bombardments? Since the Granada invasion? Since Bahía de Cochinos? Since the Iran takeover of the '50? Since Bush Jr. leaves Darfur to its own luck


Point 2: The actions of a few do not represent the whole. Though parts of the USAF are indeed corrupt I have no doubt most of them are good people who merely want to serve their country (or make money for college) not monsters.

Point 3: Bush has been the leader who's done the most about the Darfur issue, while the U.N. dodges calling it Genocide (So they can avoid having to do anything - U.N. Law requires all member nations to declare war on nations supporting genocide) Bush publicly called it a genocide and though it was only token he did something (Embargo) and after our fun little romp through the middle east Bush couldn't send a dozen troops to get ice cream without public outrage and it's unlikely they'd do anything but make it worse. Darfur's only hope rests in the hands of PMCs (Private Military Contractors) who could easily deal with the fighting (Think Excutive Outcomes style company going in and picking off the leaders on both sides.)


_________________
How good music and bad reasons sound when one marches against an enemy!


Mishcana
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 144

01 Aug 2007, 7:30 am

Not fond of Atlantis, but I enjoyed the first half of the movie, and like to tune into the sg-1 series whenever Star Trek, Air Farce (canadian show) Rick Mercer Report or the Simpsons isn't on.

I've met a couple corrupt military people, but on the whole them seem like just ordinary people, who have a better concept of following the rules that most people. A lot also have the strong urge to protect their countrymen, and would die to save them.

Who would you rather be in control of something that could mean our end that is highly scientific than Nerds, geeks, a few military personel for safety?

. . . I guess you could say the UN, but I don't think that'd work very well . . .



AleusMundiSonoftheRex
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 17
Location: Lima, Perú

01 Aug 2007, 11:01 am

Flagg wrote:
AleusMundiSonoftheRex wrote:
C'mon don't tell me that you've hasn't been annoyed by the premise...decive the pulbic from the wonders of the universe for its own good at hands of the USAF military (The same guys that put people or better say corpsicles into Iraq... :evil:) only for an smalll elite of privligied ones to enjoy its secrets, and mostly nerdy scientists or impossibly noble-and-good militars, when you've seen a noble-and-good militar since Abu Ghraib? Since Vietnam and the Napalm bombardments? Since the Granada invasion? Since Bahía de Cochinos? Since the Iran takeover of the '50? Since Bush Jr. leaves Darfur to its own luck? Are they the people we want going to the stars or it's just that the Asgard are as delusional as us?


Point 1: The United States Armed Forces is infamous for it's skill at hiding things from the public - every time a new document is declassfied it's something you had no idea they were thinking about trying when they were testing it for over three decades.

Quote:
or impossibly noble-and-good militars, when you've seen a noble-and-good militar since Abu Ghraib? Since Vietnam and the Napalm bombardments? Since the Granada invasion? Since Bahía de Cochinos? Since the Iran takeover of the '50? Since Bush Jr. leaves Darfur to its own luck


Point 2: The actions of a few do not represent the whole. Though parts of the USAF are indeed corrupt I have no doubt most of them are good people who merely want to serve their country (or make money for college) not monsters.

Point 3: Bush has been the leader who's done the most about the Darfur issue, while the U.N. dodges calling it Genocide (So they can avoid having to do anything - U.N. Law requires all member nations to declare war on nations supporting genocide) Bush publicly called it a genocide and though it was only token he did something (Embargo) and after our fun little romp through the middle east Bush couldn't send a dozen troops to get ice cream without public outrage and it's unlikely they'd do anything but make it worse. Darfur's only hope rests in the hands of PMCs (Private Military Contractors) who could easily deal with the fighting (Think Excutive Outcomes style company going in and picking off the leaders on both sides.)


Bushy wanna save Darfur to be remembered by doing something good after the Irak fiasco :roll:


_________________
Some loser sub-deity attached me to this mudball to die in it. I'm already plotting revenge.


BastetsEye
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 216
Location: Kent, England

01 Aug 2007, 5:07 pm

I mainly watch it for comedy and don't take it too seriously, but couldn't the Goa'uld be a metaphor for what's going on in Iraq, and the NID for the corrupt politicians, after all the Army just follow orders, regardless of who gives them, Plus they may a point of not making Bush the President in the 'Gate Universe.
The Ori can also be a metaphor for religious extremists, of which there are in any religion unfortunately!



AleusMundiSonoftheRex
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 17
Location: Lima, Perú

01 Aug 2007, 5:59 pm

BastetsEye wrote:
I mainly watch it for comedy and don't take it too seriously, but couldn't the Goa'uld be a metaphor for what's going on in Iraq, and the NID for the corrupt politicians, after all the Army just follow orders, regardless of who gives them, Plus they may a point of not making Bush the President in the 'Gate Universe.
The Ori can also be a metaphor for religious extremists, of which there are in any religion unfortunately!


Yeah, once you see it too carefully you realize how a mess it is :twisted:


_________________
Some loser sub-deity attached me to this mudball to die in it. I'm already plotting revenge.