Page 1 of 1 [ 13 posts ] 

Quatermass
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,779
Location: Right behind you...

11 Jan 2008, 12:54 am

It had to happen.

Given that things like Rotten Tomatoes do criticisms of movies, sometimes even arbitrarily, I've decided to do my own satirical and sarky reviews of various movies. With a few exceptions, these will be movies that I have actually watched. I might take suggestions, but I won't accept even 10% of them, unless it piques my interest.

I've gotta go out in a moment, but to give you a foretaste of what is to come, I will be starting with that wonderful comedic Grand Guignol, 300.


_________________
(No longer a mod)

On sabbatical...


Dunwich
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 331

11 Jan 2008, 1:46 am

Suggestions? Hmmm...

Would it be going out on a limb to assume you'll be reviewing the three Quartermass films?

Right now I'm reading Roger Ebert's, "Your Movie SUCKS", the sequel to "I Hated, Hated, Hated, Hated, HATED This Movie". The earlier book did a review of "The Beyond" which somehow made it sound like the coolest movie ever made in the process of trashing it. Because of it, I became a Lucio Fulci fan, which paved the way for becoming an H.P. Lovecraft fan the following year (I'd first heard of THAT guy in an equally negative explaination in a Dario Argento film guide that described him as a sexually-retarded, racist mysogenist), and last year I bought a guide to films based on Lovecraft stories, wherein I first learned what the Quartermass films were about.

I've yet to actually see them though.

Oh, my point is that we could always use more satirical film reviews, even if everyone else on the net is already doing them.

PLEASE contact me and/or JimmyNeutronRules if you need any insight for a review of either Transformers movie.

I still want to go ahead with my idea for a MST3K-esque show, even though the original cast is doing 2 seperate versions of the same and could probably sue my ass if I actually tried to make money off it.


_________________
No one in the world ever gets what they want,
and that is beautiful.
Everybody dies frustrated and sad,
and that is beautiful.

-TMBG


Quatermass
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,779
Location: Right behind you...

11 Jan 2008, 2:16 am

Dunwich wrote:

Would it be going out on a limb to assume you'll be reviewing the three Quartermass films?


Probably not, I only saw the TV version of Quatermass and the Pit. Oh, and spell it right. It is QUATER, not QUARTER.



Dunwich wrote:
PLEASE contact me and/or JimmyNeutronRules if you need any insight for a review of either Transformers movie.


I doubt it, I'm not interested.


_________________
(No longer a mod)

On sabbatical...


Quatermass
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,779
Location: Right behind you...

11 Jan 2008, 2:45 am

Okay, my satirical review of 300.

300

Review By Lenny Moult
(OT: It's just a pseudonym, just my twisted movie reviewer persona)


Oh, how I long for the days when gory historicals just meant a few hundred badly-dressed extras, and a few buckets of Kensington Gore*. When actors declaimed their lines in a dignified, Shakespearian manner, rather than a shout that sounds like the malodorous cacophony that young people call music nowadays. The rot set in when some little upstart called Kubrick made that film Spartacus. Then, that other w***** Ridley Scott had to go and 'revive' the genre with Gladiator. I do not call it a revival as much as necrophilia.

And now, Zack Snyder has made 300.

First point of issue: the title. No self-respecting film has any numbers in the title. Indeed, no self-respecting film would have a title that was just a number. But I digress.

This waste of good celluloid was based on a comic by one Frank Miller. I heard he is credited with the revival of Batman. That's another case of necrophilia, but once again I digress. All comics are a waste of good paper that can be used for newspaper, to tell people what is really happening in the world, instead of some imaginary one, or a screwed up version of history.

The plot is that King Leonidas is the king of Sparta. Well, not exactly 'Sparta', but rather 'SPAAARRRRRTAAAAAAAA!! !!' He is told by a messenger that King Xerxes of Persia demands tribute of earth and water, or else Sparta will burn. And in the face of all diplomatic sense, Leonidas screams in his face, and kicks him down the well.

Hilarity ensues.

I won't bore you with everything I hate about this film, just some highlights:

*There's enough blood to recreate the Black Knight scene from Monty Python and the Holy Grail, which I reviewed back in '74
(editor: yeah, he gave it four puke-buckets).

*The Spartans are depicted as ridiculously muscled he-men with muscles the size of the Sydney Harbour Bridge, and casting Daisy Wenham as a Spartan was the worst casting decision since Ed Wood cast his chiropracter as Bela Lugosi.

*King Xerxes is portrayed as an effeminate gangsta covered in so much bling he can hardly walk, and the Persians are portrayed as monsters, when they were really
(racist tirade edited by editor).

*The backgrounds are too arty-farty and unconvincing.

*The mangled rendition of 'As Time Goes By' during the Warner Bros logo.

*The rock music. The ancient Greeks didn't have no bloody rock guitars and synthesisers!! !!

This sordid film is 111 minutes of imbecility, and only cack-heads should go watch it. I suggest wearing cotton-wool glasses to help soak up any blood your eyes will bleed.

RATING: 5 decapitated heads.


Note: This review of 300 is satirical in intent. I invisaged my fictional film critic as a mix between Roger Ebert, Mary Whitehouse, and Malcolm Muggeridge.

*Kensington gore is this, from Wikipedia. Python fans will be familiar with it from Sam Peckinpah's Salad Days and the Black Knight Sequence.

Quote:
'Kensington Gore' was also a trademark for fake blood used in films and in theatre. It was manufactured by a retired British pharmacist, Mr John Tynegate, during the 1960's and 1970's, in the village of Abbotsbury, Dorset. Many varieties of blood, having various degrees of viscosity, shades and textures were available. Since Mr Tynegate's death, the name "Kensington Gore" has become a generic term for stage blood.


_________________
(No longer a mod)

On sabbatical...


Dunwich
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 331

11 Jan 2008, 2:56 pm

Quatermass wrote:
Probably not, I only saw the TV version of Quatermass and the Pit. Oh, and spell it right. It is QUATER, not QUARTER.


Oh, sorry about that. Wow, I guess my eyes aren't content to just be face-blind.

Great starting review. I don't suppose you saw Robot Chicken's "1776" sketch, wherein they point out 300's absurdities by giving the American revolution the same treatment?


_________________
No one in the world ever gets what they want,
and that is beautiful.
Everybody dies frustrated and sad,
and that is beautiful.

-TMBG


Quatermass
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,779
Location: Right behind you...

11 Jan 2008, 5:20 pm

Dunwich wrote:
Quatermass wrote:
Probably not, I only saw the TV version of Quatermass and the Pit. Oh, and spell it right. It is QUATER, not QUARTER.


Oh, sorry about that. Wow, I guess my eyes aren't content to just be face-blind.

Great starting review. I don't suppose you saw Robot Chicken's "1776" sketch, wherein they point out 300's absurdities by giving the American revolution the same treatment?


Nah. I think I saw (posted on YouTube and embedded here on WP) a sketch showing Leonidas screaming "This is (insert word here)! !! !" and kicking things, or more often, people over.


_________________
(No longer a mod)

On sabbatical...


Dunwich
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 331

11 Jan 2008, 10:16 pm

Quatermass wrote:
Nah. I think I saw (posted on YouTube and embedded here on WP) a sketch showing Leonidas screaming "This is (insert word here)! !! !" and kicking things, or more often, people over.


Oh yeah, that was a 4-5 part sketch in the following episode.

"1776" was way funnier. George Washington and co. all ran around shirtless against Redcoats in blackface, and highlights included a colonial nonchalontly bashing in a random polar bear's face with a musket-butt during the Delaware crossing, and John Hancock delivering his famous signature in mid-air while doing Matrix-style slowmo backflip over a dozen soldiers.

The show really went down the crapper this season, but that sketch kept a lot of my friends watching. I'd post it, but I've probably already cluttered up your thread more than you'd like.

Will you be posting these reviews anywhere else besides WP?


_________________
No one in the world ever gets what they want,
and that is beautiful.
Everybody dies frustrated and sad,
and that is beautiful.

-TMBG


Quatermass
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,779
Location: Right behind you...

11 Jan 2008, 10:43 pm

Probably not, unless I do a humour book IRL.


_________________
(No longer a mod)

On sabbatical...


SleepyDragon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 May 2007
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,829
Location: One f?tid lair or another.

12 Jan 2008, 6:28 am

Dunwich wrote:
Quatermass wrote:
Oh, and spell it right. It is QUATER, not QUARTER.

Oh, sorry about that. Wow, I guess my eyes aren't content to just be face-blind.

You ain't the only one.

Quatermass wrote:
only cack-heads should go watch it

I could have sworn I read "crack-heads" when I first saw that.



Quatermass
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,779
Location: Right behind you...

12 Jan 2008, 8:06 am

Cack-head is another way of saying 'shit-head'.


_________________
(No longer a mod)

On sabbatical...


gbollard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2007
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,009
Location: Sydney, Australia

13 Jan 2008, 3:13 am

Mary Whitehouse wouldn't EVER have watched 300



Quatermass
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,779
Location: Right behind you...

13 Jan 2008, 3:32 am

gbollard wrote:
Mary Whitehouse wouldn't EVER have watched 300


If she did, she would have had a heart attack.......several times over. And it would have started with just that lightining revealing the title logo. :twisted:


_________________
(No longer a mod)

On sabbatical...


Quatermass
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,779
Location: Right behind you...

06 Jun 2008, 11:57 pm

I've decided to revive this thread. Now, I want requests, but I will only do so from a certain pre-set list...

*The first 20 James Bond films

*The Indiana Jones quadrilogy

*The Star Wars sextology (excepting Revenge of the Sith, I haven't watched that)

*A Scanner Darkly

*Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (that's the recent, Tim Burton version, for those of you that don't quite know)

*Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy

*The Matrix trilogy

If someone makes a suggestion that's not on the list, and I like it and have watched the film, then I'll do it.


_________________
(No longer a mod)

On sabbatical...