wu_wei_lion wrote:
I just joined the site today and wasn't sure what to expect. I suppose I'll dive into this otherkin topic first. There's a lot of issues flying around here including the scientific basis or lack thereof for therianthropy/otherkin; it has nothing at all to do with science and more to do with the spirit and perception. If I identify with what I perceive as the spirit of a lion (which I do) and that helps me to find my way in the world can anyone tell me there's something wrong with that? If I believe that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Saviour (which I do not) who is to say that's wrong? It matters not a bit that there's not scientific evidence for or against such things. It's a personal identification with an archetype, as Jung might have said.
I have so many ideas running through my mind it's difficult to organize them but the issue of perception is a sticky topic. Our understanding of reality is entirely based on perception, scientific or otherwise. Reality is created entirely in our minds through the use of measurements and language, which can never be reality itself. The identification with an animal and/or mythical creature is an explanation for a state of being and helps me to unify and work with my own reality, perhaps even transcend it. I can't prove that I'm a lion nor do I care to; if others disagree, that is their right.
Uhhh yeah. So how did I come to the spirit of the lion? I've always had a strong feline connection, never met a cat that didn't like me, I'm a leo born in the year of the tiger, and when I met other people who were into therianism, they said they saw it in me. It seemed to fit so I have gone with it since. I have to say, though, that those who believe only in what empirical data tells them will lead a barren existence indeed. I must also add that science is far far FAR from infallible. In the world of molecular biology, there are often multiple possible interpretations for the same results. People wrangle and argue based upon their own particular beliefs, interests, and perceptions of the data until and answer is generally agreed upon but even that is not set in stone. There are as many false starts wrong turns as there are in, say, evolution.
OK. I'm done. I'm sure I've bored everyone enough. Hello all...
your absolutely right
ive come to pretty much the same conclusion though subjects like quantum mechanics and researching the many flaws of the theory's that modern science tends to pass off as fact's.. and well pretty much everything along those lines really.