gbollard wrote:
Wow chesapeaker.
I'm sorry you've had such a bad time here on WP and that you had a bad time with your aspie ex too.
Sometimes when you have problems with one or more people of a similar nature, you can generalize to assume it includes the whole race, creed, preferences or colour. It seems to me that this is what has happened here.
I've met quite a lot of aspies who were/are much better than the "average" NT. In fact, I strive to be one of those types of aspies myself. As a result, I don't hold with your views.
I'm assuming you're gone now anyway but if you happen to read this, it's worth remembering that "there are none so blind as those who will not see". Which means; if you decide that all aspies are bad and never give them a chance, then you will never see a good one.
Well, I didn't want to come across as generalizing. I think the terms AS = good/victimized and NT = Bad/opprossor, is what is going on here. I wouldn't have written to you if I didn't think you would understand. My point is that I don't like or think the Aspie vs. NT thing going on here. Your statement about quite a lot of Aspies being better than the Average NT" is exactly what I am trying to point out. If that is how you really feel, it is hard for me to comprehend as a good thing.
Why is NT even any kind of "standard" for evaluation? NT in itself is an unfair assumption of who a person is or isn't. It seems that people are polarized into AS camps and NT camps and NT's are fair game for insults and abuse on this forum. How could that possibly be a good thing? It seems to me, to be the same behavior that AS folks complain about being done to them by NT's. Why would anybody want to do that to another person? It feels "mean."
I am responding, because I really want you to understand. I am sure you are very nice. But, if you have all the traits of the "average" AS, you will turn this around on me because you cannot understand what another person might be feeling, or that you might be hurting them. I am truly sorry about that.