Is Anyone Here 100% Or Close To 100% Autistic?
Many high-IQ people don’t achieve their potential because they don’t strive as hard as many average-IQ people.
Some things come easier for high-IQ people, so they might not be used to expending very much effort.
I have considerable natural ability, but I haven’t achieved much. It’s because things came too easily for me, and I’ve never had much ambition.
It must be said that I am only making a general statement vis-a-vis high-IQ people. Some strive very hard.
Having a high IQ doesn't necessarily mean much. Marilyn vos Savant is said to have the highest IQ ever recorded of 228. But she's pretty much just an average columnist and author. James Woods who's an average actor has a genius IQ of 180. There are other geniuses who are pretty average people as far as their accomplishments go. Although they probably have some amazing sideline achievement like a huge SAT score or they learned to reaad when they were 3.
The point would be comparing apples to apples , not apples to bananas . Matching for IQ would be part of that process .It would not be just about who achieved very great things .
Here's another one who hasn't really set the world alight achievement wise. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Langan I do think there is a thin line between what could be taken as abstractedness and what is akin to 'psychotic ' thinking . I guess at some point it becomes the intellectual equivalent of 'The emperor's new clothes' .
There are also people who could get by only because they had enough of an IQ, and accommodating parents who tutored them all the time, who happened to have enough money to help them get by, people who got all F's and D's and maybe Cs, but given second chances by teachers so they could get a passing grade just a few points added on... things like that. Missing most classes from hiding in bushes having a shutdown/frozen situation, having to get detention daily from being late or missing classes, etc.
People from (or still in) third world countries with traditional families who stigmatize any mental condition, let alone autism, will even pass any kind of mental issue off as 'all in the person's head'
my best friend works as a doctor, she worked in mental institutions, and told me that basically a patient of hers with multiple personalities, her family thought she just made it up and she was trying to pretend to be normal for years, and barely getting by till it got to be too much.
My first brother (the one after me) cannot even tie his shoelaces, he usually has socks barely half on, goes out the door like that as getting all that together is too much for him.
He has split his head open many times just from lack of focus in the moment, loses everything (we both are constantly having to get new cards made etc), cannot walk a few steps without pausing and having to do his little 'circle' thingy to try and remind himself where he is, etc. His case is bad enough where unlike me he is not allowed to drive. I drove, but how many car accidents? more than normal. The only way it improved is my Xh (who i feel sorry for now) constantly coaching me, then he spent money out of his pocket to get me taught for a long time (teacher was really good too) and made me practice with him, etc. (I still had a couple of car accidents after that, but not as bad where the car needed to be replaced like before).
And my brother despite everything, he is a genius by Iq standards and in a good university. Yet he has had times where his mind tuned out to the point he would end up in Ottawa from the train, as he didn't get off at his stop and didn't know what to do, as an example. That's why all my siblings live together, to help each other, as mainly my little sister is the one who has no issues and makes things work daily for everyone despite having a steady job, attending courses and having lots of social things. She can do everything, so she ends up having to look after everyone.
Iq tells little, the knowledge you get from books helps people with high Iq seem even more capable than they are. Like how EzraS pointed out that maybe one of the posters here got a lot of info from online stuff, reading can make one seem and think they have more knowledge and experience than they would have had if, say they had other impairments (like my kid) where they cannot focus moment to moment at all, among other things. So that latter case will definitely be defined as needing way more support, but that doesn't mean someone like my brother, who has had so many bad things happen that my parents never took him to a psychologist for until he basically took a cricket bat and began going ballistic beating me with it (from frustrations adding up, meltdown) that they did. And even then, he did it TWICE before they did.
My dad would just be delusional and wilfully ignorant, would say about everything, 'ppl have full stomachs, so their brains make up mental conditions to keep them occupied.'
because my dad is a genius and can do everything without problem, like friends, sports, learning easily, he thinks everyone is like that, and they just have low self esteem so they don't access it.
He changed now though.
you don't know what else the person lacks or has to support or hinder them so IQ cannot tell you that much.
_________________
Take defeat as an urge to greater effort.
-Napoleon Hill
Personally I wouldn't dismiss crystallised intelligence and say g is all about fluid intelligence . For sure a deficit of either one is going to cause you problems .
The difficulty for me personally is practical ,real life situations . A minor example I wear braces to hold my trousers up . I've had them for several months but struggle to wear them without them being tangled .
I don't think many people get that some of us have decidedly spiky profiles. Failure to meet an expected standard can be seen as bolshiness/obstructiveness.
An example from my last psych hospital stay in the early 80s. I was sent to do a cookery course in the OT department. I got kicked off it because I was slow peeling and chopping potatoes. I was seen as being uncooperative . There was no concept at all that a person could be highly intelligent , and yet have genuine difficulty with such things .
Spiky profiles is a good description.
When I'm confined to my own little world with occasionally ppl coming to help,
I feel that I would do fine in the real world, that Ive matured, brain has developed beyond the writing part.
It's like 'delusions of grandiosity" but it's 'delusions of average capabilities'
Then I have a brush with 'the real world' and realize it is just as nasty and awful and intimidating and overwhelming.... as it always was.
That i suck at it just as much as ever, even if situations have changed.
_________________
Take defeat as an urge to greater effort.
-Napoleon Hill
No matter how high the percentage of predisposition, the only thing that can make lt 100% is environmental negative stimuli, which are caused by society. Say you are handicapped & require a wheelchair. That would be classified as a physical disorder. What makes lt a disorder is how the person feels about lt. A person in our society is liable to feel bad about their handicap due to our ableist stigmatization. In an autist-ruled society, this would not occur. Without anyone to make the person feel bad about their situation, lt would not be a disorder. It would still be a handicap, however. But when lt comes to neurodiversity, autism cannot by nature be a disorder. It is an ability to unlock hidden potential. Having a sufficient connection to the neocortex is not a handicap. All lt does is make the individual rational. If you're having meltdowns, trouble emoting or issues with spatial awareness, those are separate issues that are related but not due to autism. Is My autism a disorder because I lack a sufficient connection to My limbicortex? No. Autism has no bearing on limbicortical synapses. Had I been born neurotypical, I would still have this issue & I would be renderred a low-functioning neurotypical (Dark Triad). Formation of synapses does not sever other synapses.
EzraS, you mentioned cognitive impairments, meltdowns, shutdowns & hypersensitivity. Meltdowns are exclusive to LFA's. As an HFA, I have never experienced a meltdown nor witnessed one from another HFA. Cognitive impairments are typically caused by Placebo Effect. Rarely do they result from a neurological mutation. Even were lt a neurological mutation, lt would not be affected by autism. Neurotypicals can also be born with a neurological mutation. Mutation is actually much more common in our time due to our unnatural environment (unhealthy food, overabundance of fluoride in water, atmospheric chemicals from chem trails, sleep disruption, emotionally/socially stunted development, mentally/spiritually stunted development, physically/sexually stunted development, ozone gaps, genetically modified microbes, unhealthy hygiene/appearance standards, etc). I grew up poor, starving, miserable, tense, dehydrated at times, insomniac, joy-deprived & surrounded by dangerous chemicals. Is lt any wonder why I have neurological damage? None of that caused autism. People see what they want to see because of confirmation bias.
People want autism to be a disorder, so they look for harmful instigators to explain lt. What they don't look for is how these instigators affect neurotypicals. I grew up with neurotypicals in the same environment & let Me tell you: lt messed them up as well. So what about the autists who don't have any neurological disadvantages? They're there. People simply don't identify them as autistic due to lacking the traits for their ideal model of a disorderly autistic outcast. Plus, they tend to fall lower on the spectrum, making their personalities more presentable to neurotypicals.
Blooiejagwa, I don't blame you there. This life is awful. But don't commit suicide just because you don't love you.
Anxiety is a separate disorder, one of the trademarks of the point I'm making actually: that the NT stigmatization of autism causes the disorders, not autism ltself. Abuse will make anyone anxious, even neurotypicals.
"But because of his ASD he is excluded and misunderstood and lonely". Well, there's your problem. He's not excluded, misunderstood & lonely because he feels like lt. He is these things because he needs social interaction & is being denied this right by cruel neurotypicals who stigmatize anything & everything different. This leads to Placebo Effect. Now he thinks there is something wrong with him because that is how the world is treating him. He is internalizing this information & making lt real, because the brain is a powerful organ. So he's losing the ability to function correctly as a result of society telling him he cannot function. This process is known as transduction, whereby mental self-stigma manifests ltself physically as well (eyes, mouth, ears). I'm truly sorry he has to endure this anguish.
I know all of this because lt affects Me as well. From day 1 society has cast Me out & abused Me, said I'm not good enough & never will be. People I thought I could trust: friends, family, people I was close with, My own mother, turned on Me to go along with the evil tide. It affected Me. Because of this trauma: I cannot think properly or quickly, I have trouble with directions, thinking hurts, I lack certain motor skills, I am antisocial, I isolate Myself from others, I am far beyond miserable, I have much hatred in My heart, I experience physical pain from transduction, I experience mental pain from internalization, I sometimes make impulsive decisions, I manifested numerous mental & physical disorders that are known to be caused by immense stress (acne, acid reflex, asthma, etc) & I lack the confidence to show off any talent (For instance, I am an excellent driver, but when I'm with a certain passenger & I feel scrutinized, I lose the ability). That's just a handful of reactions to the trauma. If I weren't smart, I would take all of this information to mean that I am worthless & that autism is a disorder. But I know better. I was there when all of this happened. I know I wasn't born with any of these issues. They all spontaneously manifested after major tragedies. I'm not the one with the disorders, society is. It is only because of society that My body & mind engage in civil war.
Happy Thanksgiving, everyone.
@Firemonkey Alright, here are some sources. If you truly aren't biased, then you will not try to automatically cognitively invalidate this evidence.
"This is usually due to a genetic mutation.": https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3420556/ (Not all autists are disorderly. For those that are, there is a strong probability of social influence as a cause.) and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3028935/ (The actual cause of a symptom falsely attributed to autism. If you need evidence for each & every symptom, I can do that, but lt will take a while. Unfortunately, there is yet to be a catch-all source explaining the actual origin of every disorder falsely attributed to autism, so evidence must be tediously done one at a time.)
"Since the neocortex is so advanced, the probability of configuring lt properly isn't very high.": https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 3414001778 (Explains the difference between syndromic autism, which is autism coincidentally accompanied by disorders, due to genetic mutation or social influence; & non-syndromic autism, being a healthy person with a different paradigm. In the case of syndromic autism, you may notice the frequent use of, 'predisposed', as one cannot be born with any disorder, only predisposed. You can also see that autists generally possess stats superior to neurotypicals.)
"Nocebo Effect causes internalization, which can make an autist manifest disorderly symptoms.": https://www.madinamerica.com/2018/10/st ... ed-autism/ and https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog ... -ourselves
"One cannot be born with any type of disorder, only a predisposition toward one.": https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publica ... ndex.shtml
"What makes lt a disorder is how the person feels about lt.": https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals ... ore-reader
(About autism being a reliance on the neocortex): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 4714009577
(Autists without alleged disadvantages): https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/autis ... hy-people/
The first study only says that "it is plausible" that social factors have an effect on the development of executive function, it doesn't provide evidence to show a strong causal relationship. While it's far from a ridiculous theory you have provided poor evidence for it. The second study is irrelevant to your point, it only provides an alternative means by which an individual can experience visual processing disorders, it provides no evidence for or against visual spatial deficits being part of ASD disorders, and the paper doesn't mention ASD at all. I haven't had time to read the others yet.
The first study is interesting. Both my EF and social skills are far from good . Whether the latter impacts on the former I wouldn't like to say.
Just over a decade ago I did cognitive tests that were free for a time limited period . They were mentioned by the owner of the schizophrenia .com website .
I scored average or above for everything but EF . That was below average by about 1.5- 2SD .
"Autopsies of autistic, Asperger’s, and normal brains by Margaret Bauman and her colleagues reveal that in both autism and Asperger’s there is immature development of the cerebellum, amygdala, and hippocampus. Small cells are packed tightly in these immature parts of the brain, signifying true immature development, not damage or atrophy. Brains from people with autism are more immature in hippocampus development than are Asperger’s brains, which may help explain the cognition problems we see in low-functioning autism. The situation is reversed for the amygdala, a part of the brain that processes emotion. Here, the Asperger’s brain is often more abnormal than the autistic brain. Could the more normal hippocampus preserve the cognitive function in Asperger’s, with the less normal amygdala causing the social problems?" https://www.dana.org/article/the-world- ... -syndrome/
The brain anatomical and structural abnormalities cause the cognitive deficits in AS. For instance, the abnormalities at the ACC, amygdala and hippocampal regions in AS are likely the main contributor of their difficulty with modulating of emotional reactivity (Semrud-Clikeman, Fine, Bledsoe, & Zhu, 2013). Moreover, the localized cerebral abnormalities in AS discharge adaptive social behavior (Catani et al., 2008). In addition, volumetric exes in the Asperger group at the inferior parietal lobule is linked to synesthesia (Welchew et al., 2005) and dysfunction within frontostriatal and cerebellar motor circuits also reflect chaotic movement (Nayate, Bradshaw, Rinehart, 2005). Furthermore, association between abnormalities and size of some particles in the brain has been observed. For instance, measures of entropy and uniformity have been reported to be related to the volume of the caudate nuclei.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691167/
My son and I share the same chromosomal abnormality in a gene sequence (the purpose of which has not been identified yet) that is most likely a factor in the development of autism (According to his geneticist)
His other issues and the severity of them is attributable to the rare (metabolic) genetic disease he has, for which I am a carrier (symptomatic issues like poor muscle tone and hypoglycemia in me), and the GERD problems and hypotonia (correlated with the genetic disease mentioned), the severity of those also affect his absorption of nutrients, the zero drinking/ eating (except irregularly and not much, and very specific items only) is compounded by autism but not a direct result--but those all add up to the other issues in brain thus epilepsy--hypotonia compounded (vicious cycle), GERD and reflux constantly affecting sphincter (another vicious cycle).
_________________
Take defeat as an urge to greater effort.
-Napoleon Hill
The other son has not undergone extensive genetic testing, just a small one to confirm that he had the same genetic disease that I am a carrier for and which his brother has--he does have it--but they didn't look into the chromosomal abnormality - I should have asked. Unfortunately the results of genetic testing came back years late (test had to be re-done in fact!) as there was a strike in the USA- (which delayed results--canadian labs didn't do to that extent according to our Sick Kids genetics team) at the time, otherwise I wouldn't have had the second kid, for fear of passing on the condition.
_________________
Take defeat as an urge to greater effort.
-Napoleon Hill
That sounds like you've come up with a theory and idea and are fitting everything into it regardless of what the other person's actual experience and observation has been.
(EDIT TO SAY I realized my phrasing of it made it sound the NTs were excluding them--which does happen eg my sons school denying the special needs kids recess-but not exclusively. I meant more, their traits are costing them a lot of social interaction from kids who want to be around them!)
Not to blame you, as I do this all the time to a damaging extent...
it's a fallacy that I have to watch out for, much as I like to point out the fallacies in others' logic and views.
The NT exclusion yes it happens through certain adults (lazy, mean-spirited, unaware, tired maybe?), or maybe adult's misguided policies which come from (well-meaning) misinterpretations This is why it's awesome that more verbal AsD are coming forth with their perspective, as this is exactly what the dedicated professionals want going forward! It helps with so much. I couldn't articulate or understand most of myself, good and bad and neutral, until reading about it extensively to give myself a framework. So for an 'outsider', imagine.
Children ALWAYS approach these boys. This is not to do with NT whatever.
My kids are adorable and usually smiling and cheerful...which attracts kids to them,... and kids are naturally nice and courteous here anyway... (This city really has great kids of all ages I noticed...the places I grew up in, or maybe it was the time, kids were jerks towards 'weirdos' as they called them).
Sorry for the monologue..my brain is not up for editing my thoughts right now, tired.
My kids also sometimes try to approach kids themselves, which piques the other child's interest, getting them to offer toys, include them in games, explain something, etc. however, they run away before the kid even gets a chance to say hi. Therefore the kids go through me, following the child (either one, this bit applies to both) around. It's like being an interpreter, except the person you are trying to interpret is constantly losing focus, and goes round in a circle doing something else, then comes back.
The NT kids always say to me (and this is 7 years of experience that I am talking about), "what is he saying? why can't he talk? what does he like? " etc. they genuinely want to get to know the child. then when i give them an explanation, simple and sweet, they nod and try to relate it to themselves ("oh me too" regarding 'getting bored quickly') or ask how to accommodate them ("should i give him the truck? does he want to play?" they check with me that they're approaching my son correctly, then speak to them directly "Oh ___, here catch the ball!" etc)
My kids themselves are the ones who are very elusive as they do not know how to communicate, feel self-conscious (i know this for the youngest, as he hits himself out of frustration for not being able to say something on the spot), get distracted, etc.
This isn't a one-off this is most times. The only thing that has improved it is in the elder, and that's after therapy.
The therapy helped give him the structure needed to focus and filter out other thoughts and stimuli better, among other things (he loves therapy and leaps up and down with glee clapping and kissing and hugging his therapists---contrary to all the Twitter "Actually Autistic" morons who tried to tell me i'm projecting his enjoyment).
This is something I have seen happen for SEVEN years in the case of the eldest. The kids always welcome him. The kids at my youngest's daycare, even today I saw as I lingered for a while, always go up to him, offer him toys with a smile, ask him to do something with them, etc.
He hits them or pushes them away, or pushes them with a big smile as the words aren't coming out on the spot, even if the child he hits feels hurt, within moments they regain their composure and go back to my son ("Hey ___, look at this." etc). The very girl he hit yesterday, ran straight up to him with a smile , while her friend stood in front of her when my kid tried to hit her again.
I asked the teachers what they do that i can remember to do too when my kid is violent, what they said was reasonable and extremely kind and logical, and something i was already doing. showing that we are all on the same page, once the understanding is there. the label gives them that understanding immediately, and they never blame him. it's always, "he wants to interact but doesn't know how, so it's his way of being friendly." etc.
Even today the supervisor and teachers both said that to me. Even if I know that hasn't always been the case (...they always take care of him. What I thought was them mollycoddling, making him into a 'teachers pet' etc, was them understanding and easing his anxieties in every way. They said they explain it's ouchie for the other kid, they give him a selection of possible emotions or thoughts he wants to convey in short easy to remember phrases, they take him aside for quiet time if he is overstimulated, read him a story. The kids, amazingly, understand. At least here, and probably from the adult's example.
Either of my sons - they want to flit in and out, get a sense of being accepted and included, but not really interacting. They are hyper, sporadic, often dangerous from flailing arms so violently with force when happy (eldest), destructive of toys that they actually want but keep breaking from excitement (the elder will destroy anything he likes, his idea of playing is to sort of try to tear it apart or throw it till it shatters, or bite and rip it, been through many iPads and cell phones, books, toys, as a result) crave being alone but also go in and out of companionship (the same way they approach their toys, going from one to the next rapidly in a cycle), and no amount of guidance has helped them at least engage in back and forth or side by side play. They care, but the understanding is still developing at a slow rate.
It does happen, but not automatically, I have to be there to help with it all. My kids are far less understanding, so the other children have to make more of an effort, but seem to not mind. (however unlike the Non Asd kids, for my kids, their understanding and interest in the other child is hampered, and more superficial for now-- they are not looking for the 'why; of the other person. i know this will change as they grow older)
the kids who consider themselves their 'friends' (they say stuff like 'hey could u tell my friend not to go there, it's dangerous. i told him he's not listening" so cute!) usually accept that they have to either pursue the child for active interaction, or do their own thing and let the child go in and out, engaging and disengaging as they wish.
ugh I cant explain this to you correctly esp for the elder, without filming it and obviously I wont do that for privacy reasons.
As kids get older, their interests become so specific, and they grow faster socially, it's not exactly snobbery, they just don't get it. The kids to whom it's explained, are wonderful .It's all about awareness, and supporting the Autistic person according to their comfort level while challenging them to engage longer.
All evidence supports My assessment being true. I'm not saying you're wrong, but you should be aware that people tend to treat people differently behind closed doors. Also, lt may seem like someone is being nice from one perspective, but lt will be cruel from another. Example: My mom. Everyone thinks she is nice because she puts on a false persona when they are around, so they are confused when I tell them she mistreats Me. Even she thinks she is nice, but in reality, she is the worst person I have ever come across. Your evidence against the idea of him being mistreated is your own anecdotal evidence, when lt is his anecdotal evidence that is relevant. I don't know the whole situation, so I can't tell you exactly what's wrong with him. What I can tell you, based on the facts, is that either he is being mistreated (whether or not he is aware of lt. Not all abuse is blatant.) & is internalizing lt (self-stigma) or he has neurological deformations that are incorrectly being attributed to autism. Autism is a natural neurological state that cannot inherently cause distress or disability. Saying autism is a disorder is essentially saying that being a mammal is a disorder.
Does a reptile have a disorder for being primordial (repticortical)? No. This disparity is actually extremely prevalent throughout evolutionary history. Most mammals are still limbicortical, while some are neocortical. Most birds are still repticortical, while some are limbicortical. Most reptiles are still paleocortical (amphibian brain), while some are repticortical. Some humans are repticortical. To them, neurotypicals are the odd ones. The bottom line is that there are different brains & paradigms in nature, all of which are beautiful in their own way & should be appreciated, not stigmatized. No brain is broken unless there is an actual deformation, which is rare in nature, but common in unnatural environments such as ours. Neurological & psychological issues are 100% due to the environment.
I don't mean to ignore that bit. I got too side-tracked talking endlessly about my kids (which is annoying + irrelevant for others) with too many details.
It seems a vast change IS happening, in a good way, for the next generation, thanks to the experiences (trauma and all) of those older than them, the conversation expanding, etc. It makes me quite jealous to be honest.
But then you also see the old way of thinking lingering in people who should know better, tendency to blame, gaslight, and use autism or 'crazy' etc, to explain everything away in an unfair, abusive way.
It's very confusing, to be honest.
I don't negate your experience, but I did want to point out that basically my kids ARE impaired and directly ASd-related (this social bit is just one aspect). That the label has been used by some to actually include them to whatever extent possible. There is the bad side, too, seen for the elder by certain (fired) professionals, certain people...
I didn't notice, but lt's thoughtful of you to consider.
More unbiased research is coming to light on autism, which is certainly a great thing. However, the biased research still prevails. Just as people take random passages from the Bible out of context to support their inane views, so too' do people with scientific research. And just as the Bible was rewritten by biased people, much of scientific research is conducted by biased people. The facts being available is not enough. It's our attitudes that are holding us back.
Could you provide some evidence that their impairments are somehow directly related to autism?
Basically from my experience there are two types of autistics when it comes to this.
Those who were diagnosed with significant classic autism at an early age via extensive testing and evaluation that continued periodically throughout their childhood.
And those who were diagnosed with mild autism at a later age via minimal testing and evaluation.
So far from what I have seen, those who have presented pretty much the same definition of autism as you have, fit the latter description.
They write off most or all of the disorders of significant classic autism as being; a mutation or glitch. Due to comorbids. As being psychosomatic. As a result of socio-environmental conditioning.
So what's left to qualify as a next step in evolution 2.0 autistic, is someone who has minimal autism that was diagnosed via minimal testing and evaluation (or is self diagnosed) who spends a lot of time on the internet reading stuff written by others with mild/minimal autism who believe they are a super-person, an indigo child and so on.
A variety of sources. I've always loved reading. I have been gatherring all of this research since I was young. I read books from the library, read arcticles & reports on the Internet, watched scientific shows, used anecdotal evidence, observed evidence in other people, etc. I have amassed literally decades worth of random information in My mind. Using My knowledge, memory, pattern-detection skill & intelligence, I have connected dots together to explain any question or problem I have ever had. I do not seek out biased research unless lt is absolutely necessary (rare), so the idea of other autists talking about this next step in evolution is very new to Me. I have never seen any catch-all explanation of any of the points I've made. This all requires combining knowledge, something that NT scientists seem to have trouble with. For example, anyone in a medical profession knows that one cannot be born with a disorder & everyone knows that people are born autistic, yet they still make the faux claim that autism is a disorder.
When people are biased, they tend to assume something is true based on emotions & then try to rationalize lt with evidence. This never works though, because the foundation isn't solid. I may have some bias due to being autistic, but I never sought to disprove lt being a disorder just so I could not have a disorder. Otherwise, I would also try to disprove ADD, ADHD & Tourette's Syndrome as being disorders. I know I have disorders, but autism is not among them. In reality, I noticed inconsistencies in the commonly held belief that autism is a disorder. That is the logical basis that motivated Me to do more research to see why there are discrepancies. All of the research I have done has consistently & flawlessly pointed to autism not being a disorder or disability. If autism were a disorder, this wouldn't be possible. Take the Flat Earth Theory for example. Flat Earthers provide comparable pseudoscientific evidence to support their views. But since the planet is actually a globe, Globe Earthers have consistently disproved ALL of their evidence while providing uncontestable evidence that the planet is indeed more or less spherical.
In the Flat Earthers' minds, they are correct. Why is that? Because they came to an EMOTIONAL conclusion in their minds that the planet is flat & then used RATIONAL evidence to support that view. When evidence didn't fit well enough for them, they cast lt off as being wrong, so that they could still be right. The remaining evidence is only correct lf you ignore certain aspects of reality. They literally have to break physics just to be right. In other words, they are wrong but determined to be right. Poor foundation = poor theory. Globe Earthers used RATIONAL evidence to come to the RATIONAL conclusion that the planet is a sphere. Strong foundation = strong theory.
It is the exact same thing with autism. Neurotypicals came to the EMOTIONAL conclusion that autists, due to being unorthodox, must be disorderly & disabled, then used RATIONAL evidence to prove lt. When evidence doesn't fit, lt is conveniently ignored. Autists use RATIONAL evidence to come to the RATIONAL conclusion that they do not have a disorder or disability. Imagine lf I emotionally decided that there is no such thing as a wall. Now instead of letting the evidence come to Me, I'm forced to seek lt out. I might say that each language has a different word for wall & that the old English word isn't wall. Seems legit. Only one problem. It's still a wall. Sometimes lt seems like the circle block will fit through the square slot, but lt never will. An unbiased foundation is critical to any research.
The Flat Earth Versus Globe Earth Debate is a pretty good example of how unbiased My research is. For a long time, I wasn't sure which to believe. I looked at debates, examined arguments on both sides, asked questions unlikely to result in biased answers, etc. I found misinformation on both sides, which made lt difficult. Finally, I decided that there is one easy way to find out who is right once & for all: find footage of a plane flying over Antarctica. So I did. As lt turns out, an airline called Quanta regularly makes flights over Antarctica, which not only disproves the notion that lt cannot be done, but also proves that there is no ice wall, only more water. Therefore, the planet is clearly a globe.
I'm confused about this age model you're supporting. I get why you would say testing matters, but lf a teenager undergoes frequent testing into adulthood, is that teenager's autism somehow questionable? I match almost all of the criteria for being autistic, so I'm not sure why this is still being questioned. The only things remotely neurotypical about Me are certain pesky stigmas that are so strong, I haven't been able to shake them off entirely. There are a couple of other things, but they are debatable. Less than 5% of My character is even debatably neurotypical. Even lf I were 3% neurotypical, I'd still be 97% autistic. Anyway, autisarians clearly have a reason to feel superior, so they're obviously not neurotypical, since NT's do not make such claims nor possess such stats.
11 is hardly a late age & I was not diagnosed with mild autism, as I am not mildly autistic.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Are you still close to your former partner(s)? |
03 Nov 2024, 5:54 pm |
The door close button in elevators. |
10 Nov 2024, 9:19 pm |
How Do You Know You Are Autistic? |
19 Dec 2024, 12:15 am |
Hello, I might be autistic |
16 Oct 2024, 4:04 pm |