Post a video of yourself!! !! ! !! ! ! !!

Post Reply New Topic

[youtube]http://http://youtu.be/oK4a-M1NILc[/youtube]

I like the crackle.

Thanks.

That's odd - I'll try again...

[img][700:349]http://sessile-oak.co.uk/picture_library/FGalSB.jpg[/img]

... if that doesn't work, you can see it HERE.

Last edited by keef on 28 Sep 2011, 3:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

Keef, That's too nice, I'd want to live in it and not just keep it for a workshop. I love that frame.

Thanks. I'm glad you like it.

It's a nice space to work in, though I'm thinking of glazing the front of the main bay and putting in a wooden floor and lining its walls and ceiling so I can use it more as a carving studio. The office upstairs is quite a nice space and I've slept in it a few times (it has a sofa-bed in one corner).

I could probably convert it to a small house without too much trouble but I fancy the idea of building a big green oak two storey round house to live in - I don't think that, as a species, we evolved to live in spaces with too many straight lines.

Really, that sounds beautiful. I would like to build a round grain silo shaped tower type house out of (maybe blue stone)stone in the Shenandoah Valley. I was thinking three stories would be nice. But first I want to build a 30 + foot Vardo type home but looks like a Russian dacha to live in.

Do you have any photos of your carvings? You should post them in the forum in the art, music writing forum. I'd love to see your work.

Your tower house sounds like it could be an interesting project - and the Vardo type home - I hope you get there one day.

I posted some more photos of my work in the Arts area, as you suggested...
arty stuff

http://www.vimeo.com/8423361

i can not embed this. it is an example of what i could clearly identify with when i was little.

Thank you Keef, I will, my Vardacha won't cost so much to build, around $20,000 at most. I'll buy some land and save a whole lot of money to build my stone grain silo house while living in it, plus I'll have my inheritance someday too.

Cool, I'll go check them out.

Thank you for sharing this with me and everyone B9. I was thinking you were probably one of the "little professor" types as a child. I remember seeing a photo of you when you were young that you posted awhile back, you were a really cute child too.

http://svtplay.se/v/2389331/hetsiga_scener_i_goteborg

I'm in this. Somewhere. Probably a good idea not to say where.

here is me going for a country drive, i always have comments, and often they are very insignificant.
i become cranky on a few occasions, but forget it.

this is what australia looks like in one place.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXlfubTRJM0[/youtube]

Well this is different from your other driving videos but I like it just the same. It looks like you had a beautiful drive, B9.

Hey B9 nice vids.

Dose the comondor have a LS2 engine?

I thought I would try this out. All the videos that I saw have been interesting. I don't have much going on, but sometimes I talk too much anyway.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYMOne3asTw


I can't seem to make it work right

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wYMOne3asTw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Oh, well, maybe I'll try again later.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYMOne3asTw[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYMOne3asTw[/youtube]

YES!! !! ! Finally figured it out! Sorry I kind of rambled. I love science and am intrigued by atoms and sub atomic particles. It is really hard for me to communicate my thoughts as I speak, it is much easier in writing. And it always seems that my kids need something, in the vid my baby bumped her head, she was fine


Don't bother to read the rest of this if you don't like science. (I could have found a better place to talk about this but it sort of is a part of who I am.)
I wanted to edit this one last time to clarify my theory on proton placement (not that most people care!) If electron charge repels other electrons and yet is attracted to protons in the nucleus this is directly correlated to the statistical placement of orbitals and distance from protons. My theory is that the proton placement is directly affected by electrons, taking into consideration wave/particle properties and interaction among all other leptons and interference of surrounding particles. Combine this with the up/down quark configuration and interaction of gluons in protons and neutrons. The way I see it the proton, neutron configuration of the nucleus would place the protons with its down quark at -1/3 e facing away from the nearest or interacting electron, this would sit nicely along side of a neutrons +2/3e up quark creating a nearly neutral zone. The issue becomes the left over (now un-used) +1/3 of a +2/3 e up quark in the proton (or neutron, which ever up quark you picture best), which it would be reasonable to think this is what keeps the interacting electron in check and "neutralized". As the elements become bigger and acquire an imbalance in charge more neutrons become necessary to keep the element neutral since this is not a perfect or completely necessary addition for some stability the result is isotopes. Just a theory, as I said I don't have the math skills to quantify this. I suppose a mathematical equation of the total charges involved in a "standard atom" (not an Isotope) would be at a deficit in charge which can be balanced by the addition of neutrons. I think a statistical analysis of isotopes could prove or disprove the theory. The most common Isotope should equal the deficit.