nannarob wrote:
Chuck, I do not mind if there is some feeling against NT's here; in fact I can understand it. AND I know Jim would disapprove of my signature. AND I am being nasty. AND you are right that it could stir something up. So I will remove it in a few days. AND (taking a breath) you are a wonderful role model for us. AND if I feel bad I am doing the wrong thing.
"She's identified as NT, what can you expect. I thought it was inappropriate but that's NT's for you."
Robyn, I have no idea about the history of this phrase, but you seem incredibly sensitive, patient and kind to Aspies. I mean you've done that with me, and I would try the patience of Job. So, if you do try to keep us in line every once in a while, that's fine with me. And I don't know why anybody would disagree with my sense of you. And I think Chuck feels the same way. But if anybody wants to disagree, they can.
Robyn, I think you are really sweet.
But, Robyn, please, when you do come after me, and it's bound to happen, just don't make me wet my pants, I'm begging you, OK? I bet you could be REALLY, REALLY scary. Sort of like almost everyone else is. Well, at least to me.
Now, Chuck, you seem like a really nice guy, sort of like Alan (the Older) and Lau are. And I know that you know that there are a heck of a lot of wonderful NT's in this world, a lot of NT jerks, and some wonderful Aspies anf some very, very, very scary Aspies. And I think Robyn would agree.
Chuck, I think you are really sweet.
So, Chuck, please, when you do come after me, and it's bound to happen, just don't make me wet my pants, I'm begging you, OK? I bet you could be REALLY, REALLY scary. Sort of like almost everyone else is . . .
Hey, not everyone is scary. And I've tried.