cosmiccat wrote:
Quatermass wrote:
Quote:
Next time, I'll refrain from posting anything remotely funny in the Cafe, as not to offend anyone.
Actually Quatermass, my intentions were to show that it is a personal reaction which varies greatly between generation and age of viewer. I was trying to provide some input from the younger generation and went to a bit of trouble to do it. And you did ask for our opinions. Should we lie? My kids were totally cool with it. It wasn't intended to be a lynching. I think your putting your video up for a poll was an interesting subject for the Cafe.
Thank you. It sounded like a lynching, however, and so I am glad it isn't. I probably wouldn't show it to my kids (unless they liked British comedy, and if they were ever born) until they were maybe 12. Believe it or not, I was laughing at macabre humour at a fairly young age (at Con Air, although it was probably more schadenfreude than anything else). However, there are lines I do not cross. Anubis crossed it once when he posted one of the VG Cats webcomics, which is sometimes quite funny, but this one wasn't. It involved one of the main characters being curious about how Winnie the Pooh, a stuffed animal, could eat honey. So he vivisected him. That was funny, but it is more the stuff of nightmares, compared to, say, the macabre dream sequence in
CSI: Grave Danger where Nick Stokes dreams about his own autopsy. Nick Stokes getting dissected was funny. Winnie the Pooh isn't funny dissected.
postpaleo wrote:
Quatermass wrote:
Well, I did not put it together, and I did not think of the abuse aspect.
You did it? Sweet, I got into it. Liked it, don't let it discourage you. It's not like you sold your butt to Hitler to make pretty films, even if they are considered art. Sorry I used the word "guy" to discribe you, I didn't know you had done it.
I did not make the video. Someone else did. I don't even have a YouTube account. Graelwyn does, if memory serves.
_________________
(No longer a mod)
On sabbatical...