cyberdad wrote:
My understanding is the US National Hyperlexia Advocacy group will be canvassing the American Psychiatric Association to formally recognise hyperlexia as a separate condition according to DSM criteria when DSM V is published in 2012.
Interesting. It might be a good thing. Under those conditions, I would probably be considered hyperlexic.
I don't know how successful that attempts to separate out hyperlexia will be. It seems that that the DSM is moving in the direction of merging various types of ASD into a single category, so there would probably be resistance to splitting off a new category.
Quote:
Regardless of that outcome I recognise that my daughter has "autisitc like traits" and that intervention is necessary. Apart from speech therapy my wife and I found that our own training using visual/written cues has been beneficial as we have not found any necessity to use ABA, psychotherapy or drug therapy.
Many people feel that ABA is not very useful. I think that psychotherapy and drug therapy are useful for dealing with co-morbid conditions and problems that are indirectly caused by AS/hyperlexia. They are generally not useful with dealing with the primary disorder.
_________________
"Like lonely ghosts, at a roadside cross, we stay, because we don't know where else to go." -- Orenda Fink