Lefebvre

Page 1 of 2 [ 25 posts ] Go to page 1, 2 Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Lefebvre
Blue Jay

Joined: 5 Nov 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 79

28 Apr 2011, 12:24 pm

Hello, i hope there is freedom of speech in this site, i kust had my topic removed

But i think it will work out fine

Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

28 Apr 2011, 12:28 pm

There isn't free speech here, or on the vast majority of respectable forum sites. Why? Because it's private property.

Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

28 Apr 2011, 12:29 pm

You can debate monotheism but you can't flame bait people with statements like 'monotheists are idiots' 'atheists are idiots' 'monotheists are the best' 'atheists are the best'. Instead try more neutral language that is open to debate, as I can assure you, a healthy majority of the monotheists in the PPR are very intelligent and worth talking to. Just a piece of advice, from another Atheist good luck mate

_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do

Lefebvre
Blue Jay

Joined: 5 Nov 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 79

28 Apr 2011, 12:36 pm

Tequila wrote:

There isn't free speech here, or on the vast majority of respectable forum sites. Why? Because it's private property.

Oh dear, i am a buddhist/taoist: there is no private property there.
Only decadent societies have this

TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

28 Apr 2011, 12:43 pm

Lefebvre wrote:

Tequila wrote:

There isn't free speech here, or on the vast majority of respectable forum sites. Why? Because it's private property.

Oh dear, i am a buddhist/taoist: there is no private property there.
Only decadent societies have this

Actually I'm the one who locked your thread and I'm Atheist / Zen Buddhist! :lol:

An element of "Right speech" is called for. :wink:

Welcome to WrongPlanet!

Moog
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

28 Apr 2011, 12:47 pm

Lefebvre wrote:

Tequila wrote:

There isn't free speech here, or on the vast majority of respectable forum sites. Why? Because it's private property.

Oh dear, i am a buddhist/taoist: there is no private property there.
Only decadent societies have this

Well then, WP is a decadent society, and you're going have to respect it's property laws while you're on it.

I don't think its very Buddhist to go attacking other religions or their adherents, which seems to be what the problem is, if I'm piecing the clues together correctly.

_________________
Not currently a moderator

Last edited by Moog on 03 May 2011, 8:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

Lefebvre
Blue Jay

Joined: 5 Nov 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 79

28 Apr 2011, 12:56 pm

Moog wrote:

Lefebvre wrote:

Tequila wrote:

There isn't free speech here, or on the vast majority of respectable forum sites. Why? Because it's private property.

Oh dear, i am a buddhist/taoist: there is no private property there.
Only decadent societies have this

Well then, WP is a decadent society, and you're going have to respect it's property laws while you're on it.

I don't think it's very Buddhist to go attacking other religions or their adherents, which seems to be what the problem is, if I'm piecing the clues together correctly.

No, buddhists are no softies. Esoteric religion is superior to monotheism, i'm very sorry

Moog
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

28 Apr 2011, 1:02 pm

Lefebvre wrote:

Moog wrote:

Lefebvre wrote:

Tequila wrote:

There isn't free speech here, or on the vast majority of respectable forum sites. Why? Because it's private property.

Oh dear, i am a buddhist/taoist: there is no private property there.
Only decadent societies have this

No, buddhists are no softies. Esoteric religion is superior to monotheism, i'm very sorry

There's no need to be sorry for your attachments. Just recognise them and let them go.

_________________
Not currently a moderator

Brainfre3ze_93
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Jun 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,912
Location: Not here

28 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm

Welcome!

_________________
" If I did THIS... would that mean anything to you? "

AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

28 Apr 2011, 1:59 pm

Lefebvre wrote:

Moog wrote:

Lefebvre wrote:

Tequila wrote:

There isn't free speech here, or on the vast majority of respectable forum sites. Why? Because it's private property.

Oh dear, i am a buddhist/taoist: there is no private property there.
Only decadent societies have this

No, buddhists are no softies. Esoteric religion is superior to monotheism, i'm very sorry

Do you really think of buddhism as "esoteric religion"? If that is true, you're contradicting yourself by saying "buddhists are no softies."

And it cannot possibly be superior to monotheism. "Esoteric" ANYTHING cannot even be superior to itself, much less anything else!

:lol:

And welcome to WP!

Don't take THIS post too seriously. I'm still upset your thread got locked before I got my reply in.

TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

28 Apr 2011, 2:19 pm

AngelRho wrote:

I'm still upset your thread got locked before I got my reply in.

Meh;

I'm sure you'll have plenty more opportunity to cross swords with this new member.

Booyakasha
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 Oct 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,898

28 Apr 2011, 2:40 pm

Why isn't anyone attacking Pastafarians? i feel left out. :evil:

I reckon we should do some mischief or at least get ourselves inflamed from time to time. :scratch: