welcome Redbus,
i have just turned 53, 14 months upon official diagnosis, which occurred just over two months after i had self-identified on this sit -
just having been invisible (and i can assure you i was NEVER hiding) as an aspieform HFauti for all that time... it takes a hell of a lot of adaptive power out of you
yes i might be true that you were misdiagnosed and are not affected, but there is little in your post that i find particularly convincing either way...
you will find that there are a somewhat large number of aspies in these parts, i believe mainly of the female gender, whose aspieness is characterized by a certain 'malleability' as opposed to the more 'typical' rigidness which is part of the diagnostic criteria.
although male myself, i have always presented more female-like...
i think the linguistic talent has something to do with it...
i'll leave any discussing your dx right there, and get to the questions:
i don't think there is such a thing as 'mild' aspergers, at least in its essence; i also am quite convinced that Asperger's IS HFA (i don't believe the language acquisition argument holds very much water - the pragmatical language USAGE of most if not all aspies is still 'different' enough from NT 'normal' usage.
the term 'mild' is really only applicable in terms of the Quantity of affectedness, i.e. in the resulting behavioural problems, which are obviously VISIBLE problems.
in that sense, yes my autism is so extremely mild, that i would choose to regard ANY of my autistic traits a TALENT, honestly: any of them; and i was measured conservatively in the highly-gifted range, with no weak areas (which is somewhat un-autistic)
and yes, indeed, had i known at age 18 (in Holland) that i would from then on have been entitled to a certain minimum benefit for the rest of my life, i would in fact have arranged my life in a manner better to suit my social ineffectiveness, and would NEVER have had the need to apply for same benefits...
i did not know, that is all...
you tell me: how is my autism / asperger's 'mild'
but granted, now that i know...
and the above is in no way intended to claim that my problems can be in any way construed as being even close to the unmildness (i.e. severity of 'symptoms') of any let's say Kanner-auti -
on the other hand: they stand very little chance of still going unnoticed and unaided and un-cared-for - there are those of us on WP who wouldn't mind being a little bit more 'severe' to finally get them the official dx
next, you can't really say that 10% of you would be non-affected; autism is pervasive (the words are in effect synonymous), which means ALL of you is affected, but within that context, yes you could say the sponge-saturation might vary from x% to X%, as long as it's all the sponge
extra: i do not believe 'social anxiety' is an essential part of autism, i do however believe that due to the nature of the autistic experience, 'anxiety' per se would be about the first response to autistic perception; and the more so when it comes to things social; but i believe it can be worked on by exposing oneself and training oneself, and learning to cope, and cope better, and maybe even gain enough confidence to be able to let go...
it's what happened with my eyes, and shyness, and whatever... i got exposed, and somehow, i got through, with not too much embaressment, and i lived to tell - as a result i am very good and even expressive with my eyes,
and i can behave very natural and nt-like, and although i NEVER act a 'part'
it is always at best 'i play myself' - you never get me as a person, only as a function, sort of
the heart's not in it, you could say, but i learnt the truth is, however much heart i may really have, that particular proverbial kind of heart was never anywhere to be in
i can only hope that made some kind of sense,
Robert
_________________
a point in every direction is the same as no point at all - or is it
may your god forgive you